Comparison of the Quality of Phase Ⅲ Non-commercial Clinical Trials in Japan, the United States, and the United Kingdom before the Implementation of the New Japanese Clinical Trials Act

Q4 Medicine
Sachiko YAMAUCHI, Yoshikazu MIWA, Masayuki IKEDA, Shinichiro UEDA
{"title":"Comparison of the Quality of Phase Ⅲ Non-commercial Clinical Trials in Japan, the United States, and the United Kingdom before the Implementation of the New Japanese Clinical Trials Act","authors":"Sachiko YAMAUCHI, Yoshikazu MIWA, Masayuki IKEDA, Shinichiro UEDA","doi":"10.3999/jscpt.54.3_95","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent research misconduct, represented by the valsartan scandal, has raised questions about the quality of non-commercial trials not for regulatory approval in Japan. Unlike in the US and Europe, non-commercial clinical trials are not regulated by law in Japan, which was believed to be a reason why quality could not be guaranteed. However, until now, few studies have compared the quality of clinical studies among countries. In this study, the quality of Japanese non-commercial phase Ⅲ trials before the implementation of the Clinical Trials Act (CTA) in 2018 was compared with Western non-commercial trials registered in the database using study design as quality indicators. The study found a lower proportion of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) (70% in Japan, 89% in the US, and 88% in the UK) and fewer blinded designs (46% in Japan, 59% in the US, and 52% in the UK) in non-commercial trials in Japan. Single-arm trials not for either cancer or rare diseases, which are usually considered low quality because of a lack of fair comparison, were more common in Japan (82%) than in the US (76%) and the UK (50%). In terms of endpoint setting, most non-commercial trials in Japan had surrogate endpoints, with only a few trials using true endpoints (5%) compared to the US (24%) and the UK (40%). A comparison of these quality indicators in Japanese non-commercial trials before and after the CTA implementation showed no increases in the proportion of RCT and blinded designs, but an increase in the proportion of trials using true endpoints and appropriate use of single-arm design. In conclusion, the lack of legal regulation in Japan may have indirectly affected the quality of non-commercial phase Ⅲ trials in Japan at the time. Implementation of the CTA has contributed to some quality improvements, but the effect is limited at present.","PeriodicalId":14602,"journal":{"name":"JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3999/jscpt.54.3_95","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent research misconduct, represented by the valsartan scandal, has raised questions about the quality of non-commercial trials not for regulatory approval in Japan. Unlike in the US and Europe, non-commercial clinical trials are not regulated by law in Japan, which was believed to be a reason why quality could not be guaranteed. However, until now, few studies have compared the quality of clinical studies among countries. In this study, the quality of Japanese non-commercial phase Ⅲ trials before the implementation of the Clinical Trials Act (CTA) in 2018 was compared with Western non-commercial trials registered in the database using study design as quality indicators. The study found a lower proportion of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) (70% in Japan, 89% in the US, and 88% in the UK) and fewer blinded designs (46% in Japan, 59% in the US, and 52% in the UK) in non-commercial trials in Japan. Single-arm trials not for either cancer or rare diseases, which are usually considered low quality because of a lack of fair comparison, were more common in Japan (82%) than in the US (76%) and the UK (50%). In terms of endpoint setting, most non-commercial trials in Japan had surrogate endpoints, with only a few trials using true endpoints (5%) compared to the US (24%) and the UK (40%). A comparison of these quality indicators in Japanese non-commercial trials before and after the CTA implementation showed no increases in the proportion of RCT and blinded designs, but an increase in the proportion of trials using true endpoints and appropriate use of single-arm design. In conclusion, the lack of legal regulation in Japan may have indirectly affected the quality of non-commercial phase Ⅲ trials in Japan at the time. Implementation of the CTA has contributed to some quality improvements, but the effect is limited at present.
日本新临床试验法实施前日本、美国和英国Ⅲ期非商业临床试验的质量比较
最近以缬沙坦丑闻为代表的研究不端行为,引发了人们对未经日本监管机构批准的非商业试验质量的质疑。与美国和欧洲不同,非商业临床试验在日本不受法律监管,这被认为是无法保证质量的一个原因。然而,到目前为止,很少有研究对各国临床研究的质量进行比较。在本研究中,以研究设计为质量指标,比较了2018年临床试验法案(CTA)实施前日本非商业期Ⅲ试验的质量与数据库中注册的西方非商业试验的质量。该研究发现,在日本的非商业试验中,随机对照试验(rct)的比例较低(日本为70%,美国为89%,英国为88%),盲法设计较少(日本为46%,美国为59%,英国为52%)。由于缺乏公平的比较,通常被认为是低质量的癌症或罕见疾病的单臂试验在日本(82%)比美国(76%)和英国(50%)更常见。在终点设置方面,日本的大多数非商业试验都有替代终点,与美国(24%)和英国(40%)相比,只有少数试验使用真实终点(5%)。对实施CTA前后日本非商业试验中这些质量指标的比较显示,RCT和盲法设计的比例没有增加,但使用真终点和适当使用单臂设计的试验比例有所增加。总之,日本缺乏法律监管可能间接影响了当时日本非商业阶段Ⅲ试验的质量。CTA的实施对质量有所改善,但目前效果有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信