Motivated or inhibited? – an analysis of the predisposition to adopt technological implements in Personal Financial Planning

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Heber Pessoa da Silveira, Matheus Albergaria, Paulo Farnezi
{"title":"Motivated or inhibited? – an analysis of the predisposition to adopt technological implements in Personal Financial Planning","authors":"Heber Pessoa da Silveira, Matheus Albergaria, Paulo Farnezi","doi":"10.15728/bbr.2022.1317.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The adoption of technology in Personal Financial Planning (PFP) is permeated by motivating and inhibiting factors, with the predisposition to adoption being strongly influenced by personal traits. The present paper analyzed this predisposition among 366 higher education students in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Using primary data and applying Logit and Probit regression models with Maximum Likelihood estimators, the study combined sociodemographic variables with constructs from a validated psychometric scale, assessing individuals in relation to their adoption of financial technology tools. Contrary to the notion that people avoid technology tools due to insecurity, the results showed that the inhibitors “Discomfort” and “Insecurity” did not play a relevant role in the intention to use technology in the PFP. The motivators “Optimism” and “Innovativeness” are considered statistically significant in the intention of use. Those who don't use it are quite disinterested and unconvinced of the benefits, therefore averse to technology, while those who use it highlight the benefits of technology in the PFP.","PeriodicalId":37145,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Business Review","volume":"24 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2022.1317.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The adoption of technology in Personal Financial Planning (PFP) is permeated by motivating and inhibiting factors, with the predisposition to adoption being strongly influenced by personal traits. The present paper analyzed this predisposition among 366 higher education students in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Using primary data and applying Logit and Probit regression models with Maximum Likelihood estimators, the study combined sociodemographic variables with constructs from a validated psychometric scale, assessing individuals in relation to their adoption of financial technology tools. Contrary to the notion that people avoid technology tools due to insecurity, the results showed that the inhibitors “Discomfort” and “Insecurity” did not play a relevant role in the intention to use technology in the PFP. The motivators “Optimism” and “Innovativeness” are considered statistically significant in the intention of use. Those who don't use it are quite disinterested and unconvinced of the benefits, therefore averse to technology, while those who use it highlight the benefits of technology in the PFP.
积极还是压抑?-分析个人财务规划中采用科技工具的倾向
个人财务规划(Personal Financial Planning, PFP)中技术的采用受到激励因素和抑制因素的影响,个人特质对技术采用的倾向有很强的影响。本文分析了巴西圣保罗市366名高等教育学生的这种倾向。该研究使用原始数据,并应用Logit和Probit回归模型与最大似然估计器,将社会人口统计学变量与经过验证的心理测量量表的结构相结合,评估个人对金融技术工具的采用情况。与人们由于不安全感而避免技术工具的概念相反,结果表明,抑制剂“不适”和“不安全感”在PFP中使用技术的意图中没有发挥相关作用。激励因素“乐观”和“创新”在使用意图上被认为具有统计学意义。那些不使用它的人是相当不感兴趣的,不相信它的好处,因此反对技术,而那些使用它的人在PFP中强调技术的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brazilian Business Review
Brazilian Business Review Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信