Explaining tort and crime legal development across laws and legal systems 1850–2020 Explaining tort and crime legal development across laws and legal systems 1850–2020 , by Matthew Dyson, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2022, 448 pp, £95.00 (hardcover), ISBN 9781107144866
{"title":"Explaining tort and crime legal development across laws and legal systems 1850–2020 <b>Explaining tort and crime legal development across laws and legal systems 1850–2020</b> , by Matthew Dyson, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2022, 448 pp, £95.00 (hardcover), ISBN 9781107144866","authors":"James Gordley","doi":"10.1080/2049677x.2023.2270381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes1 (1825) 4 B & C 247, 255. 107 ER 1051, 1054.2 CG Addison, Wrongs and their Remedies (2nd edn, London 1864) 481, quoting Williams v Jones, T Hard 298, 301, 95 ER 193, 194 (KB 1727).3 (1853) 2 El & Bl 216, 118 ER 749.4 (1881) 6 QBD 333.5 WVH Rogers, Winfield & Jolowicz on Tort (16th edn, London 2002) § 12.30 436.6 Ibid § 12.35 441.7 Ibid § 4.6 74–75.8 Ibid § 18.5 630.9 London, 1887.10 Ibid 17 (‘the Roman conception of delict altogether supports … the conception that really appears to underlie the English law of torts’).11 Ibid.12 Ibid 21.13 Ibid 22–23.14 Friedrich Karl von Savigny, System des heutigen Römischen Rechts 2 (Berlin, 1840) § 82 (‘the will to commit a violation of the law’); Bernhard Windscheid, Lehrbuch des Pandektenrechts 1 1(4th edn, Dusseldorf 1875) § 101 (the ‘will for the ensuing event’ (287) which the actor knows to be ‘unlawful’ (288–89)).15 ‘Of delicts and quasi-delicts’ is the title of the Code 3.4.2. On the meaning of the terms, see Jean-Baptiste Treilhard, ‘Présentation au Corps legislative, et exposé des motifs’ in PA Fenet, Recueil complet des travaux préparatoires du Code Civil (Paris 1827) 464, 467.16 Robert Pothier, Traité des obligations 1 (Paris 1761) no 116.17 CBM Toullier, Le droit civil français 11 (Paris 1846) no 113, 115 136–38.18 I III.13.2.19 Reinhard Zimmermann, The Law of Obligations Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition (Juta 1990) 16–17.20 Toullier, Droit civil no 116, 148–49.21 Ibid 149 no 2, citing D 1.9.2.44-45 (‘qui prohibere potererit teneatur si non fecerit’); Prussian Code pt 1, tit 6, no 59 (‘celui qui souffre sciemment ce qu’il pouvait et devait empêcher, en rêpond comme si l’avait ordonné’); Jean Domat, Les lois civiles liv 2, tit 8, sect 4, no 8 (‘ceux qui, pouvant empêcher un dommage que quelque devoir les engageait de prevenir, y auront manqué, pourront en être tenus’).22 Ibid no 119 150.23 Ibid n 1 citing the Lex Aquilia, D 9.5.1.24 Zimmermann, Law of Obligations 1027–28.25 254 n 82, citing Toullier, Le droit civil français 11: nos 156–8.26 Ibid no 158 211.27 Ibid no 119 151.28 D 50.17.55.","PeriodicalId":53815,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Legal History","volume":"87 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Legal History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2049677x.2023.2270381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes1 (1825) 4 B & C 247, 255. 107 ER 1051, 1054.2 CG Addison, Wrongs and their Remedies (2nd edn, London 1864) 481, quoting Williams v Jones, T Hard 298, 301, 95 ER 193, 194 (KB 1727).3 (1853) 2 El & Bl 216, 118 ER 749.4 (1881) 6 QBD 333.5 WVH Rogers, Winfield & Jolowicz on Tort (16th edn, London 2002) § 12.30 436.6 Ibid § 12.35 441.7 Ibid § 4.6 74–75.8 Ibid § 18.5 630.9 London, 1887.10 Ibid 17 (‘the Roman conception of delict altogether supports … the conception that really appears to underlie the English law of torts’).11 Ibid.12 Ibid 21.13 Ibid 22–23.14 Friedrich Karl von Savigny, System des heutigen Römischen Rechts 2 (Berlin, 1840) § 82 (‘the will to commit a violation of the law’); Bernhard Windscheid, Lehrbuch des Pandektenrechts 1 1(4th edn, Dusseldorf 1875) § 101 (the ‘will for the ensuing event’ (287) which the actor knows to be ‘unlawful’ (288–89)).15 ‘Of delicts and quasi-delicts’ is the title of the Code 3.4.2. On the meaning of the terms, see Jean-Baptiste Treilhard, ‘Présentation au Corps legislative, et exposé des motifs’ in PA Fenet, Recueil complet des travaux préparatoires du Code Civil (Paris 1827) 464, 467.16 Robert Pothier, Traité des obligations 1 (Paris 1761) no 116.17 CBM Toullier, Le droit civil français 11 (Paris 1846) no 113, 115 136–38.18 I III.13.2.19 Reinhard Zimmermann, The Law of Obligations Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition (Juta 1990) 16–17.20 Toullier, Droit civil no 116, 148–49.21 Ibid 149 no 2, citing D 1.9.2.44-45 (‘qui prohibere potererit teneatur si non fecerit’); Prussian Code pt 1, tit 6, no 59 (‘celui qui souffre sciemment ce qu’il pouvait et devait empêcher, en rêpond comme si l’avait ordonné’); Jean Domat, Les lois civiles liv 2, tit 8, sect 4, no 8 (‘ceux qui, pouvant empêcher un dommage que quelque devoir les engageait de prevenir, y auront manqué, pourront en être tenus’).22 Ibid no 119 150.23 Ibid n 1 citing the Lex Aquilia, D 9.5.1.24 Zimmermann, Law of Obligations 1027–28.25 254 n 82, citing Toullier, Le droit civil français 11: nos 156–8.26 Ibid no 158 211.27 Ibid no 119 151.28 D 50.17.55.
点击增大图像尺寸点击减小图像尺寸注1 (1825)4 B & C 247,255。2 . CG Addison,《过错及其救济》(1864年第2版,伦敦)481,引自Williams v Jones, T Hard 298, 301, 95 ER 193, 194 (KB 1727)(1853) 2 El & Bl 216, 118 ER 749.4 (1881) 6 QBD 333.5 WVH Rogers, Winfield & Jolowicz on Tort(2002年伦敦第16版)§12.30 436.6 Ibid§12.35 441.7 Ibid§4.6 74-75.8 Ibid§18.5 630.9伦敦,1887.10 Ibid 17(“罗马的侵权行为概念完全支持……似乎真正构成英国侵权法基础的概念”)同上。12同上21.13同上22-23.14弗里德里希·卡尔·冯·萨维尼,司法系统Römischen Rechts 2(柏林,1840)§82(“违法的意志”);Bernhard Windscheid, Lehrbuch des Pandektenrechts 1 1(第4版,1875年杜塞尔多夫)§101(“对随后事件的意愿”(287),行为人知道这是“非法的”(288-89))。15“侵权行为和准侵权行为”是规范3.4.2的标题。关于这些术语的含义,见Jean-Baptiste Treilhard,“关于民事法律的法律规定,以及对动机的揭露”,见PA Fenet, Recueil complil des travaux prparatoires du Code Civil Code (Paris 1827) 464, 467.16 Robert Pothier, trait des obligations 1 (Paris 1761) no 116.17 CBM Toullier, Le droit Civil francaais 11 (Paris 1846) no 113, 115 136-38.18 I III.13.2.19 Reinhard Zimmermann, the Law of obligations of Civil Tradition (Juta 1990) 16-17.20 Toullier,民事权利第116号,148-49.21,同上149第2号,引用第1.9.2.44-45条(“依法禁止物权为不有效物权”);普鲁士法典第1段第6段第59号(“celui qui souffre sciment ce qu ' il pouvait et devait empêcher, en rêpond comme si l ' avait ordonnest”);Jean Domat, Les lois civiles生活2,第8卷,第4节,第8号(' ceux qui, pouvant empêcher undommage que quelque devoir Les engageait de preir, y onont manquire, pourront en être tenus ')同上1,引证阿基利亚法,D 9.5.1.24齐默尔曼,《债务法》1027-28.25 254 n 82,引证图利耶,《民事法》11:第156-8.26同上第158 211.27同上第119 - 151.28 D 50.17.55。
期刊介绍:
Comparative Legal History is an international and comparative review of law and history. Articles will explore both ''internal'' legal history (doctrinal and disciplinary developments in the law) and ''external'' legal history (legal ideas and institutions in wider contexts). Rooted in the complexity of the various Western legal traditions worldwide, the journal will also investigate other laws and customs from around the globe. Comparisons may be either temporal or geographical and both legal and other law-like normative traditions will be considered. Scholarship on comparative and trans-national historiography, including trans-disciplinary approaches, is particularly welcome.