Germany’s Triangular Relations with the United States and China in the Era of the Zeitenwende

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Sebastian Biba
{"title":"Germany’s Triangular Relations with the United States and China in the Era of the <i>Zeitenwende</i>","authors":"Sebastian Biba","doi":"10.1080/09644008.2023.2275050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTRussia’s invasion of Ukraine has prompted a historic turning point (Zeitenwende) in Germany. This Zeitenwende has included a caesura in Berlin’s dealings with Moscow. But what about the ripple effects on Germany’s relations with its crucial security guarantor, the United States, and its most important trading partner, China? This article investigates Germany’s triangular relations with the US and China respectively in light of the ‘Russia factor’. It does so through the theoretical lens of the so-called Strategic Triangle Approach (STA) and the notion of ‘dual triangles’. The analysis reveals that Russia’s aggression against Ukraine has triggered an amplification of previously existing trends, in that German–US ties have been further strengthened whereas the German–Chinese relationship has become fraught with additional tensions. This has led to a state of affairs whereby Germany’s long-held rationale of staying on friendly terms with both superpowers is now being put to the test like never before since the turn of the millennium. Even more importantly, however, an STA-grounded assessment of Germany’s current situation also demonstrates that even – or especially – in the era of Zeitenwende, the country may be well-advised to maintain an overall cooperative course vis-à-vis China – if indeed that is possible. DISCLOSURE STATEMENTNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsSebastian BibaSebastian Biba is a Senior Researcher at the Institute of Political Science at Goethe University Frankfurt and an Associate with the Institute of Asian Studies at the German Institute for Global and Area Studies (GIGA) in Hamburg. In the past, he held visiting positions at Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), the University of Sydney, and Peking University. His research on Europe/Germany–US–China triangular relations has appeared in leading IR and Area Studies journals, including International Affairs, Journal of Chinese Political Science, and European Foreign Affairs Review. Additionally, Sebastian is the (co-)editor of two books on the topic.","PeriodicalId":46640,"journal":{"name":"German Politics","volume":"46 1‐2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2023.2275050","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTRussia’s invasion of Ukraine has prompted a historic turning point (Zeitenwende) in Germany. This Zeitenwende has included a caesura in Berlin’s dealings with Moscow. But what about the ripple effects on Germany’s relations with its crucial security guarantor, the United States, and its most important trading partner, China? This article investigates Germany’s triangular relations with the US and China respectively in light of the ‘Russia factor’. It does so through the theoretical lens of the so-called Strategic Triangle Approach (STA) and the notion of ‘dual triangles’. The analysis reveals that Russia’s aggression against Ukraine has triggered an amplification of previously existing trends, in that German–US ties have been further strengthened whereas the German–Chinese relationship has become fraught with additional tensions. This has led to a state of affairs whereby Germany’s long-held rationale of staying on friendly terms with both superpowers is now being put to the test like never before since the turn of the millennium. Even more importantly, however, an STA-grounded assessment of Germany’s current situation also demonstrates that even – or especially – in the era of Zeitenwende, the country may be well-advised to maintain an overall cooperative course vis-à-vis China – if indeed that is possible. DISCLOSURE STATEMENTNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsSebastian BibaSebastian Biba is a Senior Researcher at the Institute of Political Science at Goethe University Frankfurt and an Associate with the Institute of Asian Studies at the German Institute for Global and Area Studies (GIGA) in Hamburg. In the past, he held visiting positions at Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), the University of Sydney, and Peking University. His research on Europe/Germany–US–China triangular relations has appeared in leading IR and Area Studies journals, including International Affairs, Journal of Chinese Political Science, and European Foreign Affairs Review. Additionally, Sebastian is the (co-)editor of two books on the topic.
时代转型时期德国与美国和中国的三角关系
【摘要】俄罗斯入侵乌克兰在德国引发了一个历史性的转折点。这份Zeitenwende包括了柏林与莫斯科交往的停顿。但是,这对德国与其关键的安全保障者美国及其最重要的贸易伙伴中国的关系会产生怎样的连锁反应呢?本文从“俄罗斯因素”的角度考察了德国与美国和中国的三角关系。它通过所谓的战略三角方法(STA)和“双三角形”概念的理论视角来做到这一点。分析显示,俄罗斯对乌克兰的侵略引发了先前存在的趋势的放大,即德国与美国的关系进一步加强,而德国与中国的关系却充满了额外的紧张局势。这导致了这样一种局面:德国长期以来坚持的与两个超级大国保持友好关系的基本原则,如今正面临着自世纪之交以来从未有过的考验。然而,更重要的是,基于sta对德国当前形势的评估也表明,即使——或者尤其是——在Zeitenwende时代,德国最好还是与-à-vis中国保持一种全面的合作路线——如果这确实可能的话。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。本文作者sebastian Biba是法兰克福歌德大学政治学研究所的高级研究员,也是位于汉堡的德国全球与区域研究所(GIGA)亚洲研究所的研究员。他曾在约翰霍普金斯大学高级国际关系学院、悉尼大学和北京大学担任访问学者。他对欧洲/德国-美国-中国三角关系的研究发表在国际关系和区域研究的主要期刊上,包括《国际事务》、《中国政治学杂志》和《欧洲外交评论》。此外,Sebastian是两本关于这个主题的书的(共同)编辑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
German Politics
German Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信