Perceived relationship between green logistics practices and sustainability performance: a multi-methodology approach

Chamari Pamoshika Jayarathna, Duzgun Agdas, Les Dawes
{"title":"Perceived relationship between green logistics practices and sustainability performance: a multi-methodology approach","authors":"Chamari Pamoshika Jayarathna, Duzgun Agdas, Les Dawes","doi":"10.1108/ijlm-09-2022-0367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Despite the wide use of quantitative assessment to identify the relationship between green logistics (GL) practices and the sustainability performance (SP) of firms, results of these studies are inconsistent. A lack of theoretical foundation has been cited as a potential reason for these contradictory findings. This study aims to explore the relationship between GL practices and SP qualitatively and to provide a theoretical foundation for this link. Design/methodology/approach Following a multi-methodology approach, the authors used the grounded theory method (GTM) to investigate perceived relationships through qualitative analysis and adopted the system thinking (ST) approach to identify causal relationships using causal loop diagrams (CLDs). Findings The authors identified different sustainability practices under three major categories: logistics capabilities, resource-related practices and people-related practices. This analysis showed the relationships among these practices are non-linear. Based on the results, the authors developed three propositions and introduced a theoretical foundation for the relationship between GL practices and SP. Practical implications Managerial personnel can use the theoretical foundation provided by this study when making decisions on GL practices adoption. This theoretical foundation suggests applying a holistic approach that can help optimize SP by selecting suitable practices. On the other hand, researchers can use a multi-methodology approach suggested by this study to explore complex social issues. Originality/value This study contributes to the knowledge from a methodology perspective as no previous studies have been conducted to identifying the relationship between GL practices and SP by combining GTM and ST approaches. This combination can be extended to build system dynamics models for sustainable logistics impacts bringing novelty to the research field of sustainable logistics.","PeriodicalId":317115,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Logistics Management","volume":"6 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Logistics Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlm-09-2022-0367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Despite the wide use of quantitative assessment to identify the relationship between green logistics (GL) practices and the sustainability performance (SP) of firms, results of these studies are inconsistent. A lack of theoretical foundation has been cited as a potential reason for these contradictory findings. This study aims to explore the relationship between GL practices and SP qualitatively and to provide a theoretical foundation for this link. Design/methodology/approach Following a multi-methodology approach, the authors used the grounded theory method (GTM) to investigate perceived relationships through qualitative analysis and adopted the system thinking (ST) approach to identify causal relationships using causal loop diagrams (CLDs). Findings The authors identified different sustainability practices under three major categories: logistics capabilities, resource-related practices and people-related practices. This analysis showed the relationships among these practices are non-linear. Based on the results, the authors developed three propositions and introduced a theoretical foundation for the relationship between GL practices and SP. Practical implications Managerial personnel can use the theoretical foundation provided by this study when making decisions on GL practices adoption. This theoretical foundation suggests applying a holistic approach that can help optimize SP by selecting suitable practices. On the other hand, researchers can use a multi-methodology approach suggested by this study to explore complex social issues. Originality/value This study contributes to the knowledge from a methodology perspective as no previous studies have been conducted to identifying the relationship between GL practices and SP by combining GTM and ST approaches. This combination can be extended to build system dynamics models for sustainable logistics impacts bringing novelty to the research field of sustainable logistics.
感知绿色物流实践和可持续发展绩效之间的关系:一个多方法的方法
尽管广泛使用定量评估来确定绿色物流(GL)实践与企业可持续发展绩效(SP)之间的关系,但这些研究的结果并不一致。缺乏理论基础被认为是这些相互矛盾的发现的潜在原因。本研究旨在定性地探讨GL实践与SP之间的关系,并为这一联系提供理论基础。设计/方法/方法采用多方法方法,作者使用扎根理论方法(GTM)通过定性分析来调查感知关系,并采用系统思维(ST)方法使用因果循环图(CLDs)来识别因果关系。作者将不同的可持续性实践分为三大类:物流能力、资源相关实践和人员相关实践。分析表明这些实践之间的关系是非线性的。在此基础上,作者提出了三个命题,并为GL实践与SP之间的关系提供了理论基础。实践意义管理人员在做出采用GL实践的决策时,可以使用本研究提供的理论基础。这一理论基础表明,采用整体方法可以通过选择合适的实践来帮助优化SP。另一方面,研究人员可以使用本研究提出的多方法论方法来探索复杂的社会问题。独创性/价值本研究从方法论的角度提供了知识,因为之前没有研究通过结合GTM和ST方法来确定GL实践与SP之间的关系。这种结合可以扩展到建立可持续物流影响的系统动力学模型,为可持续物流的研究领域带来新颖性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书