Evaluating the OECD-FAO and USDA agricultural baseline projections

Q open Pub Date : 2023-11-08 DOI:10.1093/qopen/qoad029
Xiaoyi Fang, Ani L Katchova
{"title":"Evaluating the OECD-FAO and USDA agricultural baseline projections","authors":"Xiaoyi Fang, Ani L Katchova","doi":"10.1093/qopen/qoad029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) in collaboration with the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO), and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) produce long-term agricultural projections for key indicators of agricultural commodities. These baseline projections play a key role in agricultural decision-making and policies. Our study compares the OECD-FAO and USDA baseline projections for harvested acres, production, and yield in the European Union, the United States, and China for rice and wheat. We evaluate the accuracy by examining the projection error, including the magnitude of bias and variance as well as the significance of bias. We also compare the OECD-FAO and USDA projections’ predictive abilities using the modified Diebold-Mariano test. We find that the accuracy of the projections decreases as the projection horizon increases. Both agencies underestimate wheat projections in the European Union and China. USDA projections generally outperform OECD-FAO projections for most rice variables, while the reverse is found for longer-horizon EU wheat projections. This assessment may enable agencies to make more accurate projections and enable market participants to better understand these projections.","PeriodicalId":87350,"journal":{"name":"Q open","volume":"28 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Q open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/qopen/qoad029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) in collaboration with the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO), and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) produce long-term agricultural projections for key indicators of agricultural commodities. These baseline projections play a key role in agricultural decision-making and policies. Our study compares the OECD-FAO and USDA baseline projections for harvested acres, production, and yield in the European Union, the United States, and China for rice and wheat. We evaluate the accuracy by examining the projection error, including the magnitude of bias and variance as well as the significance of bias. We also compare the OECD-FAO and USDA projections’ predictive abilities using the modified Diebold-Mariano test. We find that the accuracy of the projections decreases as the projection horizon increases. Both agencies underestimate wheat projections in the European Union and China. USDA projections generally outperform OECD-FAO projections for most rice variables, while the reverse is found for longer-horizon EU wheat projections. This assessment may enable agencies to make more accurate projections and enable market participants to better understand these projections.
评估经合发组织-粮农组织和美国农业部的农业基线预测
经济合作与发展组织(OECD)与粮食及农业组织(FAO)和美国农业部(USDA)合作,对农产品的关键指标进行长期农业预测。这些基线预测在农业决策和政策中发挥关键作用。我们的研究比较了经合组织-粮农组织和美国农业部对欧盟、美国和中国水稻和小麦的收获面积、产量和产量的基线预测。我们通过检查投影误差来评估准确性,包括偏差和方差的大小以及偏差的显著性。我们还使用改进的Diebold-Mariano检验比较了经合组织-粮农组织和美国农业部预测的预测能力。我们发现投影精度随着投影视界的增大而降低。这两家机构都低估了欧盟和中国的小麦预测。美国农业部对大多数水稻变量的预测总体上优于经合组织和粮农组织的预测,而欧盟对较长期小麦的预测则相反。这种评估可以使机构作出更准确的预测,并使市场参与者更好地了解这些预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信