Form, History, and the Politics of Lyric in Shelley's "ode to the west Wind"

IF 0.2 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE
ELH Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1353/elh.2023.a907207
Eric Tyler Powell
{"title":"Form, History, and the Politics of Lyric in Shelley's \"ode to the west Wind\"","authors":"Eric Tyler Powell","doi":"10.1353/elh.2023.a907207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Form, History, and the Politics of Lyric in Shelley's \"ode to the west Wind\" Eric Tyler Powell \"In considering the political events of the day I endeavour to divest my mind of temporary sensations, to consider them as already historical. This is difficult.\" –Percy Bysshe Shelley1 Percy Bysshe Shelley's \"Ode to the West Wind\" has been simultaneously one of the most influential and controversial lyric poems in the English-language canon. It has often been taken as paradigmatic, not only of Shelley's \"genius\" and value as a poet, but of Romanticism and of lyric poetry as a genre.2 This reception history is coextensive with what M. H. Abrams called a \"reorientation\" of criticism—originating with the Romantics—inverting the traditional hierarchy of poetic genres inherited from Aristotle and elevating lyric poetry as the most essentially poetic of genres.3 In recent years, this reorientation has been powerfully and usefully reconsidered through the lens of historical poetics, in particular, the concepts of \"lyricization\" and \"lyric reading,\" introduced by Virginia Jackson and Yopie Prins, through which the invention of the lyric as genre in the nineteenth century came to replace a variety of poetic forms and social functions.4 Shelley has continued to figure prominently in critical debates surrounding theories of lyric poetry, much as he figured prominently in such debates in his own time, and among the modernists and New Critics. The concept of lyric reading, I argue, is a powerful tool to reconsider Shelley's famous ode. The protocol of lyric reading is well-known: there is a speaker of the poem, who should not be confused with the poet; the dramatic situation of the speech act must be gleaned as context for interpretation and analysis; the poem itself should be the focus of interpretation, without considering the biography or intentions of the poet; historical context is only relevant insofar as it is \"in\" the poem itself. This conception of the lyric as a [End Page 723] single genre, with a defined set of rules for reading, hand in hand with expressivist theories of Romanticism, have led to a neglect of Shelley's own historical poetics as developed in his late works—in poetry and critical prose—and of the formal complexity of the \"Ode to the West Wind\" in particular.5 Foregrounding Shelley's historical poetics—the view that poetic forms have historical specificity and varying social functions as part of diverse cultures of circulation—is part of the burden of this essay. Part of what makes Shelley's Ode an interesting case for historical poetics, aside from its status as an exemplar of lyric, is that the poem is concerned with its own circulation. As an ultraradical in an era of extreme political reaction and censorship, Shelley was forced from the very start of his career as an author to consider questions of publication, circulation, and the materiality of text.6 The question of circulation is also central to contemporary debates about the lyric genre and historical poetics. As Jackson and Prins write: If nineteenth-century thinking about poetry sought to distinguish a transcendent version of lyric from contemporary cultures of circulation, and at the same time imagined an ideal (and perhaps impossible) new culture of circulation, the twentieth-century criticism that inherited these ambitions for the lyric tended to embrace it not as an ideal to be aspired toward but as the given poetic genre already in circulation.7 Both Jackson and Prins and Abrams point to John Stuart Mill's essay on \"Two Kinds of Poetry\" as a watershed in this reorientation of criticism toward the lyric genre. Mill's examples of his two kinds of poetry in the essay are Wordsworth (the poet of culture) and Shelley (the poet of nature), and Shelley is the \"most striking example ever known of the poetic temperament,\" that is, the lyric poet.8 Readings of poems and poets have their own historical specificity, and the case of Shelley is no exception: few canonical poets have had their stock rise and fall as rapidly and dramatically. The modernists and New Critics, the historical moment in which Jackson and Prins locate the codification of lyric...","PeriodicalId":46490,"journal":{"name":"ELH","volume":"817 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.2023.a907207","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Form, History, and the Politics of Lyric in Shelley's "ode to the west Wind" Eric Tyler Powell "In considering the political events of the day I endeavour to divest my mind of temporary sensations, to consider them as already historical. This is difficult." –Percy Bysshe Shelley1 Percy Bysshe Shelley's "Ode to the West Wind" has been simultaneously one of the most influential and controversial lyric poems in the English-language canon. It has often been taken as paradigmatic, not only of Shelley's "genius" and value as a poet, but of Romanticism and of lyric poetry as a genre.2 This reception history is coextensive with what M. H. Abrams called a "reorientation" of criticism—originating with the Romantics—inverting the traditional hierarchy of poetic genres inherited from Aristotle and elevating lyric poetry as the most essentially poetic of genres.3 In recent years, this reorientation has been powerfully and usefully reconsidered through the lens of historical poetics, in particular, the concepts of "lyricization" and "lyric reading," introduced by Virginia Jackson and Yopie Prins, through which the invention of the lyric as genre in the nineteenth century came to replace a variety of poetic forms and social functions.4 Shelley has continued to figure prominently in critical debates surrounding theories of lyric poetry, much as he figured prominently in such debates in his own time, and among the modernists and New Critics. The concept of lyric reading, I argue, is a powerful tool to reconsider Shelley's famous ode. The protocol of lyric reading is well-known: there is a speaker of the poem, who should not be confused with the poet; the dramatic situation of the speech act must be gleaned as context for interpretation and analysis; the poem itself should be the focus of interpretation, without considering the biography or intentions of the poet; historical context is only relevant insofar as it is "in" the poem itself. This conception of the lyric as a [End Page 723] single genre, with a defined set of rules for reading, hand in hand with expressivist theories of Romanticism, have led to a neglect of Shelley's own historical poetics as developed in his late works—in poetry and critical prose—and of the formal complexity of the "Ode to the West Wind" in particular.5 Foregrounding Shelley's historical poetics—the view that poetic forms have historical specificity and varying social functions as part of diverse cultures of circulation—is part of the burden of this essay. Part of what makes Shelley's Ode an interesting case for historical poetics, aside from its status as an exemplar of lyric, is that the poem is concerned with its own circulation. As an ultraradical in an era of extreme political reaction and censorship, Shelley was forced from the very start of his career as an author to consider questions of publication, circulation, and the materiality of text.6 The question of circulation is also central to contemporary debates about the lyric genre and historical poetics. As Jackson and Prins write: If nineteenth-century thinking about poetry sought to distinguish a transcendent version of lyric from contemporary cultures of circulation, and at the same time imagined an ideal (and perhaps impossible) new culture of circulation, the twentieth-century criticism that inherited these ambitions for the lyric tended to embrace it not as an ideal to be aspired toward but as the given poetic genre already in circulation.7 Both Jackson and Prins and Abrams point to John Stuart Mill's essay on "Two Kinds of Poetry" as a watershed in this reorientation of criticism toward the lyric genre. Mill's examples of his two kinds of poetry in the essay are Wordsworth (the poet of culture) and Shelley (the poet of nature), and Shelley is the "most striking example ever known of the poetic temperament," that is, the lyric poet.8 Readings of poems and poets have their own historical specificity, and the case of Shelley is no exception: few canonical poets have had their stock rise and fall as rapidly and dramatically. The modernists and New Critics, the historical moment in which Jackson and Prins locate the codification of lyric...
雪莱《西风颂》抒情的形式、历史与政治
雪莱《西风颂》中抒情诗的形式、历史和政治埃里克·泰勒·鲍威尔:“在思考当今的政治事件时,我努力使自己摆脱一时的感觉,把它们看作已经成为历史的。这很难。”珀西·比希·雪莱珀西·比希·雪莱的《西风颂》是英语经典中最具影响力和最具争议的抒情诗之一。它不仅被视为雪莱作为诗人的“天才”和价值的典范,而且被视为浪漫主义和抒情诗这一流派的典范这一接受史与m·h·艾布拉姆斯所称的批评的“重新定位”——起源于浪漫主义——是同步的,它颠覆了从亚里士多德那里继承下来的传统诗歌体裁的等级制度,并将抒情诗提升为最本质的诗歌体裁近年来,通过历史诗学的视角,特别是弗吉尼亚·杰克逊(Virginia Jackson)和尤皮·普林斯(Yopie Prins)引入的“抒情化”(lyricization)和“抒情阅读”(lyric reading)的概念,人们对这种重新定位进行了有力而有益的重新思考,通过这些概念,抒情作为一种体裁在19世纪被发明出来,取代了各种诗歌形式和社会功能雪莱继续在围绕抒情诗理论的批评辩论中占据重要地位,就像他在自己的时代、在现代主义者和新批评主义者中占据重要地位一样。我认为,抒情阅读的概念是重新思考雪莱的著名颂歌的有力工具。阅读抒情诗的礼仪是众所周知的:有一个诗的说话者,不应该与诗人混淆;言语行为的戏剧性情境必须被收集起来作为解释和分析的语境;诗本身应该是解释的重点,不考虑诗人的传记或意图;历史背景只有在它“在”诗歌本身时才有意义。这种将抒情诗视为一种单一的体裁,有一套明确的阅读规则,与浪漫主义表现主义理论携手并进的观念,导致了对雪莱自己的历史诗学的忽视,这些诗学在他晚期的作品中得到了发展——在诗歌和批评散文中——尤其是《西风颂》的形式复杂性强调雪莱的历史诗学,即诗歌形式作为不同的流通文化的一部分,具有历史的特殊性和不同的社会功能,是本文的负担之一。雪莱的《颂诗》之所以成为历史诗学中一个有趣的案例,除了它作为抒情诗典范的地位之外,部分原因是这首诗与它自己的流通有关。作为一个极端政治反动和审查制度时代的极端激进分子,雪莱从他作为作家的职业生涯的一开始就被迫考虑出版、流通和文本的实质性问题流通问题也是当代关于抒情体裁和历史诗学争论的核心。正如杰克逊和普林斯所写的那样:如果19世纪的诗歌思考试图将抒情的卓越版本与当代的流通文化区分开来,同时想象一种理想的(也许是不可能的)新的流通文化,那么继承了这些抒情野心的20世纪批评倾向于将其视为一种已经在流通的诗歌类型,而不是一种理想的渴望杰克逊、普林斯和艾布拉姆斯都指出,约翰·斯图尔特·密尔的文章《两种诗歌》是重新定位抒情体裁批评的分水岭。密尔在这篇文章中举了两种诗歌的例子:华兹华斯(文化诗人)和雪莱(自然诗人),而雪莱是“诗人气质的最显著的例子”,也就是抒情诗人阅读诗歌和诗人有自己的历史特殊性,雪莱的例子也不例外:很少有权威诗人的股票像雪莱那样迅速而戏剧性地起起落落。现代主义和新批评派,杰克逊和普林斯将歌词编纂的历史时刻……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ELH
ELH LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信