Print Elegies, Henry Vaughan, and the Everyday Deaths of War

IF 0.2 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE
ELH Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1353/elh.2023.a907203
Catharine Gray
{"title":"Print Elegies, Henry Vaughan, and the Everyday Deaths of War","authors":"Catharine Gray","doi":"10.1353/elh.2023.a907203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Print Elegies, Henry Vaughan, and the Everyday Deaths of War Catharine Gray Can you scale up grief? How do you mourn the ongoing, the escalating? While these kinds of questions about the scale and pace of mourning haunt many moments of historical crisis, including our own, they were particularly pressing for writers of the British Civil Wars faced with the proliferating mortality and bloody, youthful deaths of combat. These writers and their readers, living through waves of famine and disease, were accustomed to death, but the wars that shook England, Ireland, Scotland, and Wales between 1638–51 put pressure on traditional cultures of mourning and literatures of grief, as the visibility of military men, framed as eminently grievable by honor codes and political polemic, collided with the sheer numbers and pace of deaths. This pace, which exacerbated already-existing mortality rates, was in turn compounded by the periodical print journalism that developed in large part to report the wars—their political divisions, as other scholars have long argued, but also their widespread material damage. If seventeenth-century news offered \"an extreme example\" of \"information overload,\" as Joad Raymond recently suggests, then this overload took a particularly bellicose form, including information about war deaths whose fast-paced accumulations threatened to undercut the heroic singularity of martial exemplarity and raised questions about the relations of immediacy to historical commemoration, of accelerated cycles of news to fixity of meaning and consolation.1 This essay turns to a range of seventeenth-century published war elegies that struggle to mourn death, to keep up with the high mortality rates and their dissemination in the onslaught of events characterizing the war news of their moment. For some of these poets, producing broadside and pamphlet elegies in the midst of the wars, this struggle means adapting techniques of information management and journalistic formats to produce metonymies and congeries of combat mortality that make each death one in a repeatable series of current events. Others, such as Henry [End Page 609] Vaughan in his 1646 \"An Elegie on the death of Mr. R. W.,\" play on the mixed media of memorialization—on tombs and monuments, whether of stone or paper—to develop emblems of poetic repetition and fleetingness, dailiness and decay. In doing so, all these elegists undercut the widespread understandings of elegy at the time as, as Andrea Brady puts it, building \"paper monuments\" that, outlasting the mere matter of bodies and marble memorials, offered durable memory of the dead alongside understanding and closure for the mourners.2 As they negotiate the tense relations between received understandings of elegy and new experiences and media, these multiple poets do not so much produce artifices of eternity as develop a presentist, even journalistic, poetic, as they use war deaths to index the everyday deaths of wartime and thus help figure an emergent structure of feeling: of the swift and open-endedly repetitious nature of their heavily militarized and mediatized moment. By doing so, they come to exemplify the way that some elegy of the period was becoming less a poetry of the punctuating ceremonial occasion than one of the current event, as they address their own ephemerality and relation to cycles of news, while also casting each combat death as just one more occasion in what seemed to be, by the late 1640s at least, the endlessly reiterative occasions of a time of war. As they directly address these multiplying occasions, these elegists question the efficacy of singular acts of poetic consolation in ways that show that the shift to emphasizing lack of closure that Jahan Ramazani associates with modern elegy, in his book on that subject, has pre-modern roots.3 Scholarship on the sixteenth- and seventeenth- century poetry of mourning often emphasizes its memorializing and consolatory functions in ways that confirm Ramazani's characterizations: as it comes to focus on death as a subject, early modern elegy aspires to a monumentality that outlasts material memorials; it cancels complaint with consolation and compensates for loss with God, fame, or poetry itself.4 However, anxieties about the power of writing to offer consolation or even lasting meaning in the face of the erasures of time, violence, and death, long...","PeriodicalId":46490,"journal":{"name":"ELH","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.2023.a907203","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Print Elegies, Henry Vaughan, and the Everyday Deaths of War Catharine Gray Can you scale up grief? How do you mourn the ongoing, the escalating? While these kinds of questions about the scale and pace of mourning haunt many moments of historical crisis, including our own, they were particularly pressing for writers of the British Civil Wars faced with the proliferating mortality and bloody, youthful deaths of combat. These writers and their readers, living through waves of famine and disease, were accustomed to death, but the wars that shook England, Ireland, Scotland, and Wales between 1638–51 put pressure on traditional cultures of mourning and literatures of grief, as the visibility of military men, framed as eminently grievable by honor codes and political polemic, collided with the sheer numbers and pace of deaths. This pace, which exacerbated already-existing mortality rates, was in turn compounded by the periodical print journalism that developed in large part to report the wars—their political divisions, as other scholars have long argued, but also their widespread material damage. If seventeenth-century news offered "an extreme example" of "information overload," as Joad Raymond recently suggests, then this overload took a particularly bellicose form, including information about war deaths whose fast-paced accumulations threatened to undercut the heroic singularity of martial exemplarity and raised questions about the relations of immediacy to historical commemoration, of accelerated cycles of news to fixity of meaning and consolation.1 This essay turns to a range of seventeenth-century published war elegies that struggle to mourn death, to keep up with the high mortality rates and their dissemination in the onslaught of events characterizing the war news of their moment. For some of these poets, producing broadside and pamphlet elegies in the midst of the wars, this struggle means adapting techniques of information management and journalistic formats to produce metonymies and congeries of combat mortality that make each death one in a repeatable series of current events. Others, such as Henry [End Page 609] Vaughan in his 1646 "An Elegie on the death of Mr. R. W.," play on the mixed media of memorialization—on tombs and monuments, whether of stone or paper—to develop emblems of poetic repetition and fleetingness, dailiness and decay. In doing so, all these elegists undercut the widespread understandings of elegy at the time as, as Andrea Brady puts it, building "paper monuments" that, outlasting the mere matter of bodies and marble memorials, offered durable memory of the dead alongside understanding and closure for the mourners.2 As they negotiate the tense relations between received understandings of elegy and new experiences and media, these multiple poets do not so much produce artifices of eternity as develop a presentist, even journalistic, poetic, as they use war deaths to index the everyday deaths of wartime and thus help figure an emergent structure of feeling: of the swift and open-endedly repetitious nature of their heavily militarized and mediatized moment. By doing so, they come to exemplify the way that some elegy of the period was becoming less a poetry of the punctuating ceremonial occasion than one of the current event, as they address their own ephemerality and relation to cycles of news, while also casting each combat death as just one more occasion in what seemed to be, by the late 1640s at least, the endlessly reiterative occasions of a time of war. As they directly address these multiplying occasions, these elegists question the efficacy of singular acts of poetic consolation in ways that show that the shift to emphasizing lack of closure that Jahan Ramazani associates with modern elegy, in his book on that subject, has pre-modern roots.3 Scholarship on the sixteenth- and seventeenth- century poetry of mourning often emphasizes its memorializing and consolatory functions in ways that confirm Ramazani's characterizations: as it comes to focus on death as a subject, early modern elegy aspires to a monumentality that outlasts material memorials; it cancels complaint with consolation and compensates for loss with God, fame, or poetry itself.4 However, anxieties about the power of writing to offer consolation or even lasting meaning in the face of the erasures of time, violence, and death, long...
印刷《挽歌》、《亨利·沃恩》和《战争中的日常死亡》
印刷《挽歌》、《亨利·沃恩》和《战争中的日常死亡》凯瑟琳·格雷你能把悲伤放大吗?你如何哀悼正在发生的,不断升级的战争?虽然这些关于哀悼规模和速度的问题困扰着包括我们自己在内的许多历史危机时刻,但对于英国内战的作家来说,面对不断增加的死亡率和战斗中血腥的年轻人死亡,这些问题尤其紧迫。这些作家和他们的读者,生活在饥荒和疾病的浪潮中,已经习惯了死亡,但1638年至1651年间撼动英格兰、爱尔兰、苏格兰和威尔士的战争,给传统的哀悼文化和悲伤文学带来了压力,因为军人的形象,被荣誉准则和政治论战所塑造,与死亡的绝对数量和速度相冲突。这一速度加剧了已经存在的死亡率,反过来又因期刊印刷新闻而加剧,这些新闻在很大程度上是为了报道战争而发展起来的——正如其他学者长期以来所争论的那样,他们的政治分歧,以及他们广泛的物质破坏。如果17世纪的新闻提供了“信息过载”的“一个极端的例子”,正如Joad Raymond最近指出的那样,那么这种过载采取了一种特别好战的形式,包括关于战争死亡的信息,这些信息的快速积累威胁着削弱了军事典范的英雄独特性,并提出了关于直接性与历史纪念的关系的问题,新闻的加速循环与意义的固定和安慰的关系这篇文章转向了一系列17世纪出版的战争挽歌,这些挽歌努力哀悼死亡,跟上高死亡率,以及它们在当时战争新闻事件冲击中的传播。对其中一些诗人来说,在战争期间创作长篇挽歌和小册子挽歌,这种斗争意味着调整信息管理技术和新闻格式,以产生转喻和战斗死亡的集合,使每个死亡都成为一系列可重复的时事。其他人,如亨利·沃恩在他1646年的《r.w.先生之死挽歌》中,利用纪念的混合媒介——在坟墓和纪念碑上,无论是石头还是纸——发展出诗意重复和短暂、日常和腐朽的象征。在这样做的过程中,所有这些哀歌家都削弱了当时对哀歌的普遍理解,正如安德里亚·布雷迪(Andrea Brady)所说的那样,他们建造了“纸碑”,这些“纸碑”比尸体和大理石纪念碑更持久,为死者提供了持久的记忆,同时也为哀悼者提供了理解和结束当他们在对挽歌的公认理解与新体验和媒体之间的紧张关系中进行谈判时,这些多重诗人与其说是创造了永恒的技巧,不如是发展了一种现实主义的,甚至是新闻主义的,诗意的,因为他们用战争中的死亡来索引战争中的日常死亡,从而帮助塑造了一种新兴的情感结构:在他们高度军事化和调解的时刻,迅速而无限重复的本质。通过这样做,他们证明了这一时期的一些挽歌不再是一种标点仪式的诗歌,而是一种当前事件的诗歌,因为他们解决了自己的短暂性以及与新闻周期的关系,同时也把每一次战斗死亡都看作是一种场合,至少在1640年代后期,战争时期无休止地重复的场合。当他们直接处理这些倍增的场合时,这些哀歌家质疑诗歌安慰的单一行为的功效,其方式表明,贾汗·拉马扎尼在他关于这一主题的书中与现代哀歌联系在一起,强调缺乏结束,这种转变有前现代的根源16和17世纪哀悼诗歌的学术研究经常强调它的纪念和安慰功能,其方式证实了拉马扎尼的特征:当它开始关注死亡作为一个主题时,早期现代挽歌渴望一种纪念性,比物质纪念碑更持久;它用安慰来消除抱怨,用上帝、名誉或诗歌本身来补偿损失然而,面对时间、暴力和死亡的抹去,对写作的力量能否提供安慰,甚至能否带来持久意义的焦虑……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ELH
ELH LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信