Analysis of Final Semester Assessment Question Items for Class XI Indonesian History Subjects

Faridatun Hanifah
{"title":"Analysis of Final Semester Assessment Question Items for Class XI Indonesian History Subjects","authors":"Faridatun Hanifah","doi":"10.15294/ijhe.v8i2.68079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to determine the quality of the final semester assessment (PAS) questions in the Indonesian History subject Class Quantitative analysis is reviewed from the aspects of validity, reliability, level of difficulty, distinguishing power, and effectiveness of distractors. The results of the qualitative analysis of the research showed that the material aspect was met at 96%, the construction aspect at 95.14%, and the language aspect at 73.5%. Judging from the distribution of cognitive domain levels, category (C1) has 7 questions (14%), category (C2) has 35 (70%) questions, category (C3) has 3 questions (6%) and category (C4) has 5 questions (10%). The results of the quantitative analysis of the validity aspect showed that 39 questions (78%) were valid while 11 questions (22%) were invalid. The reliability of the questions is very high at 0.862. From the level of difficulty, 10 (20%) questions were declared difficult, 25 questions (50%) were medium and 15 questions (30%) were easy. Looking at the aspect of differentiating power, there are 6 (12%) questions in the poor category, 7 (14%) questions in the fair category, 26 (52%) questions in the good category, and 9 (18%) questions in the very good category, while the total category is 2 bad. (4%) questions. Judging from the effectiveness of the distractor, the category is very good 21 (42%) questions, functioning well 10 (20%) questions, functioning quite well 10 (20%) questions, functioning poorly 5 (10%) questions, and functioning not well/poorly 4 (8%) questions. Overall, the quality of the questions in terms of quantitative analysis is not good.","PeriodicalId":53353,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of History Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of History Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/ijhe.v8i2.68079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to determine the quality of the final semester assessment (PAS) questions in the Indonesian History subject Class Quantitative analysis is reviewed from the aspects of validity, reliability, level of difficulty, distinguishing power, and effectiveness of distractors. The results of the qualitative analysis of the research showed that the material aspect was met at 96%, the construction aspect at 95.14%, and the language aspect at 73.5%. Judging from the distribution of cognitive domain levels, category (C1) has 7 questions (14%), category (C2) has 35 (70%) questions, category (C3) has 3 questions (6%) and category (C4) has 5 questions (10%). The results of the quantitative analysis of the validity aspect showed that 39 questions (78%) were valid while 11 questions (22%) were invalid. The reliability of the questions is very high at 0.862. From the level of difficulty, 10 (20%) questions were declared difficult, 25 questions (50%) were medium and 15 questions (30%) were easy. Looking at the aspect of differentiating power, there are 6 (12%) questions in the poor category, 7 (14%) questions in the fair category, 26 (52%) questions in the good category, and 9 (18%) questions in the very good category, while the total category is 2 bad. (4%) questions. Judging from the effectiveness of the distractor, the category is very good 21 (42%) questions, functioning well 10 (20%) questions, functioning quite well 10 (20%) questions, functioning poorly 5 (10%) questions, and functioning not well/poorly 4 (8%) questions. Overall, the quality of the questions in terms of quantitative analysis is not good.
印尼历史十一班期末评估题项分析
本研究旨在确定印尼历史课期末评估(PAS)问题的质量,从效度、信度、难易程度、区分力和干扰因素的有效性等方面对定量分析进行回顾。研究的定性分析结果表明,材料方面满足96%,结构方面满足95.14%,语言方面满足73.5%。从认知域水平分布来看,类别(C1)有7个问题(14%),类别(C2)有35个问题(70%),类别(C3)有3个问题(6%),类别(C4)有5个问题(10%)。效度方面的定量分析结果显示,39个问题(78%)有效,11个问题(22%)无效。问题的信度非常高,为0.862。从难易程度来看,10个(20%)题为难易,25个(50%)题为中等,15个(30%)题为易易。在区分力方面,差类问题有6个(12%),一般类问题有7个(14%),好类问题有26个(52%),非常好类问题有9个(18%),而总类别是2个差。(4%)的问题。从干扰的有效性来看,这类问题是非常好的21个(42%)问题,运行良好的10个(20%)问题,运行良好的10个(20%)问题,运行不佳的5个(10%)问题,运行不佳/差的4个(8%)问题。总的来说,问题的质量在定量分析方面并不好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信