EVALUATION OF THE HELIOSAT-4 AND MCCLEAR MODELS FOR SOLAR GLOBALIRRADIATION ESTIMATE AT TWO SITES IN ARGENTINA

IF 0.1 Q4 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
A.R. Lusi, F. Orte, R. Alonso Suárez, R. D’Elía, E. Wolfram
{"title":"EVALUATION OF THE HELIOSAT-4 AND MCCLEAR MODELS FOR SOLAR GLOBALIRRADIATION ESTIMATE AT TWO SITES IN ARGENTINA","authors":"A.R. Lusi, F. Orte, R. Alonso Suárez, R. D’Elía, E. Wolfram","doi":"10.31527/analesafa.2023.34.3.76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Satellite-derived solar radiation information is necessary for assessing the financial risk of solar energy projects at arbitrary locations. These estimates must be evaluated against high-quality ground measurements to ensure the reliability of the information. In this work, 15-minute Global Horizontal Irradiance (GHI) data from the Heliosat-4 model for all-sky conditions and the McClear model for clear-sky conditions were evaluated against ground-based measurements at two Saver-Net stations (http: //www.savernetsatreps.org): Pilar (Córdoba) and Villa Martelli (Buenos Aires). Clear sky detection of the measurements was done using the modified clarity index and analyzing the variability of consecutive measurements. A bias close to -5.5 % was found for the Heliosat-4 model at both sites and 1.15 % and -0.73 % for the MCClear model in Pilar and Villa Martelli, respectively. Furthermore, the relative root mean square error (rRMSD) was2 % and 20 % for the McClear and Heliosat-4 models, respectively at both sites.","PeriodicalId":41478,"journal":{"name":"Anales AFA","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales AFA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31527/analesafa.2023.34.3.76","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Satellite-derived solar radiation information is necessary for assessing the financial risk of solar energy projects at arbitrary locations. These estimates must be evaluated against high-quality ground measurements to ensure the reliability of the information. In this work, 15-minute Global Horizontal Irradiance (GHI) data from the Heliosat-4 model for all-sky conditions and the McClear model for clear-sky conditions were evaluated against ground-based measurements at two Saver-Net stations (http: //www.savernetsatreps.org): Pilar (Córdoba) and Villa Martelli (Buenos Aires). Clear sky detection of the measurements was done using the modified clarity index and analyzing the variability of consecutive measurements. A bias close to -5.5 % was found for the Heliosat-4 model at both sites and 1.15 % and -0.73 % for the MCClear model in Pilar and Villa Martelli, respectively. Furthermore, the relative root mean square error (rRMSD) was2 % and 20 % for the McClear and Heliosat-4 models, respectively at both sites.
对heliosat-4和McClear模式在阿根廷两个地点估算太阳总辐射的评估
卫星获得的太阳辐射信息对于评估任意地点太阳能项目的财务风险是必要的。这些估计必须根据高质量的地面测量进行评估,以确保信息的可靠性。在这项工作中,根据两个Saver-Net站(http: //www.savernetsatreps.org): Pilar (Córdoba)和Villa Martelli (Buenos Aires)的地面测量值,对Heliosat-4模式的全天条件和McClear模式的15分钟全球水平辐照度(GHI)数据进行了评估。利用改进的晴空指数对测量值进行晴空检测,并分析连续测量值的变异性。在两个地点,Heliosat-4模型的偏差接近- 5.5%,而在Pilar和Villa Martelli, MCClear模型的偏差分别为1.15%和- 0.73%。此外,McClear和Heliosat-4模型在两个站点的相对均方根误差(rRMSD)分别为2%和20%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anales AFA
Anales AFA PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信