Features of the Course of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with the History of COVID-19: Impact on the Possibility and Tactics of Restoring Sinus Rhythm

Q4 Medicine
Oksana V. Stasyshena, Oleg S. Sychov
{"title":"Features of the Course of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with the History of COVID-19: Impact on the Possibility and Tactics of Restoring Sinus Rhythm","authors":"Oksana V. Stasyshena, Oleg S. Sychov","doi":"10.30702/ujcvs/23.31(03)/ss044-8792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a potentially life-threatening complication of infection. In general, AF has a high prevalence in elderly population with cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities. Thus, the presence of AF correlates with adverse outcomes in patients with previous coronavirus disease (COVID-19) which deserves increased attention and should be appropriately treated to prevent adverse outcomes.
 The aim. To analyze the prevalence and clinical course of AF in hospitalized patients after COVID-19 to determine approaches to restoring sinus rhythm.
 Materials and methods. The study included 179 patients with various types of heart rhythm and conduction disorders who suffered from COVID-19 and were hospitalized to the Department of Clinical Arrhythmology and Electrophysiology of the National Scientific Center “The M.D. Strazhesko Institute of Cardiology, Clinical and Regenerative Medicine of the NAMS of Ukraine” from 09/20/2020 to 12/21/2021. 116 patients were hospitalized with AF who suffered from coronavirus infection between 1 and 12 months ago (5.1 ± 0.2 months on average). Other heart rhythm and conduction disorders were the cause of hospitalization for 63 patients (35.2%). The first group was formed by 36 people (31%) in whom AF occurred after coronavirus infection. The second group included 25 patients in whom the form of AF changed, namely: there was a transition from paroxysmal form of AF to persistent AF, or persistent AF to a permanent form of AF. The third group included 55 patients in whom the form of AF did not change. However, in the third group, two subgroups were formed: 3A consisting of 35 patients, in whom, although the form of AF did not change, the frequency or duration of paroxysms increased, and 3B, which included 20 patients without significant changes in the course of AF. As a control group, 49 patients with AF without a history of coronavirus infection were examined.
 Results. In most patients (65%), the reason for hospitalization was AF. The first recorded paroxysms of this arrhythmia were recorded in 31% of patients 2 months after the coronavirus infection. In this group, more than half of the cases (58.4%) were patients with persistent AF, and 8.3% of those hospitalized failed to restore sinus rhythm. In those who had AF before COVID-19, 75% of its course worsened: the frequency or duration of paroxysms increased. The persistent form of AF was dominant and occurred after a previous infection in 58% of cases. In patients who had AF before COVID-19, its course worsened (in 76% of the examined persons) after the infection. Patients with a history of coronavirus infection had more frequent use of drug therapy, which is probably due to the delayed time of hospitalization to the clinic from the onset of the paroxysm.
 Conclusion. AF is the most common arrhythmia and has a worse course in hospitalized patients after coronavirus infection.","PeriodicalId":33680,"journal":{"name":"Ukrayins''kii zhurnal sertsevosudinnoyi khirurgiyi","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrayins''kii zhurnal sertsevosudinnoyi khirurgiyi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30702/ujcvs/23.31(03)/ss044-8792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a potentially life-threatening complication of infection. In general, AF has a high prevalence in elderly population with cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities. Thus, the presence of AF correlates with adverse outcomes in patients with previous coronavirus disease (COVID-19) which deserves increased attention and should be appropriately treated to prevent adverse outcomes. The aim. To analyze the prevalence and clinical course of AF in hospitalized patients after COVID-19 to determine approaches to restoring sinus rhythm. Materials and methods. The study included 179 patients with various types of heart rhythm and conduction disorders who suffered from COVID-19 and were hospitalized to the Department of Clinical Arrhythmology and Electrophysiology of the National Scientific Center “The M.D. Strazhesko Institute of Cardiology, Clinical and Regenerative Medicine of the NAMS of Ukraine” from 09/20/2020 to 12/21/2021. 116 patients were hospitalized with AF who suffered from coronavirus infection between 1 and 12 months ago (5.1 ± 0.2 months on average). Other heart rhythm and conduction disorders were the cause of hospitalization for 63 patients (35.2%). The first group was formed by 36 people (31%) in whom AF occurred after coronavirus infection. The second group included 25 patients in whom the form of AF changed, namely: there was a transition from paroxysmal form of AF to persistent AF, or persistent AF to a permanent form of AF. The third group included 55 patients in whom the form of AF did not change. However, in the third group, two subgroups were formed: 3A consisting of 35 patients, in whom, although the form of AF did not change, the frequency or duration of paroxysms increased, and 3B, which included 20 patients without significant changes in the course of AF. As a control group, 49 patients with AF without a history of coronavirus infection were examined. Results. In most patients (65%), the reason for hospitalization was AF. The first recorded paroxysms of this arrhythmia were recorded in 31% of patients 2 months after the coronavirus infection. In this group, more than half of the cases (58.4%) were patients with persistent AF, and 8.3% of those hospitalized failed to restore sinus rhythm. In those who had AF before COVID-19, 75% of its course worsened: the frequency or duration of paroxysms increased. The persistent form of AF was dominant and occurred after a previous infection in 58% of cases. In patients who had AF before COVID-19, its course worsened (in 76% of the examined persons) after the infection. Patients with a history of coronavirus infection had more frequent use of drug therapy, which is probably due to the delayed time of hospitalization to the clinic from the onset of the paroxysm. Conclusion. AF is the most common arrhythmia and has a worse course in hospitalized patients after coronavirus infection.
COVID-19病史患者房颤病程特点:对恢复窦性心律可能性及策略的影响
介绍。心房颤动(AF)是一种潜在的危及生命的感染并发症。总的来说,房颤在有心血管危险因素和合并症的老年人群中发病率很高。因此,房颤的存在与既往冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者的不良结局相关,值得引起更多关注,并应适当治疗以预防不良结局。 的目标。分析新型冠状病毒感染后住院患者房颤的患病率及临床病程,探讨恢复窦性心律的方法。 材料和方法。研究纳入了179例2019冠状病毒病患者,这些患者患有不同类型的心律和传导障碍,于2020年9月20日至2021年12月21日在国家科学中心“乌克兰NAMS M.D. Strazhesko心脏病学、临床和再生医学研究所”的临床心律失常和电生理科住院。1 ~ 12个月(平均5.1±0.2个月)感染冠状病毒住院的房颤患者116例。其他心律和传导障碍是63例(35.2%)患者住院的原因。第一组由36人(31%)组成,他们在冠状病毒感染后发生房颤。第二组包括25例房颤形式发生变化的患者,即从阵发性房颤转变为持续性房颤,或从持续性房颤转变为永久性房颤。第三组包括55例房颤形式未发生变化的患者。第三组分为两个亚组:3A组35例,虽然房颤的形式没有改变,但发作频率和持续时间增加;3B组20例,房颤病程无明显变化。对照组49例房颤患者无冠状病毒感染史。 结果。在大多数患者(65%)中,住院的原因是房颤。31%的患者在冠状病毒感染2个月后记录了这种心律失常的首次发作。在该组中,超过一半的病例(58.4%)是持续性房颤患者,8.3%的住院患者未能恢复窦性心律。在COVID-19之前患有房颤的患者中,75%的病程恶化:发作频率或持续时间增加。持续形式的房颤占主导地位,在58%的病例中发生在既往感染后。在COVID-19之前患有房颤的患者,其病程在感染后恶化(76%的被检查者)。有冠状病毒感染史的患者使用药物治疗的频率更高,这可能与发病至临床的住院时间较晚有关。 结论。房颤是冠状病毒感染后住院患者最常见的心律失常,病程较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信