The Pattern of Physics Education Students’ Diagrams and Answers in Solving Force Problems

J. Sirait, J. Ainley, M. Barstow
{"title":"The Pattern of Physics Education Students’ Diagrams and Answers in Solving Force Problems","authors":"J. Sirait, J. Ainley, M. Barstow","doi":"10.15294/jpii.v12i2.43020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Force diagrams or some say free body diagrams (FBDs), as physics representations, are usually employed to teach and learn physics concepts such as force. Physics education studies indicate that the use of FBDs can support or hinder students’ performance in solving physics problems. This study aims to investigate the type of representations drawn by students and the patterns of students’ answers while solving force problems. By involving 230 preservice physics teachers, questions about the application of Newton’s laws were administered to students to elicit the patterns of students’ diagrams and answers. Results were analysed into three categories: complete, incomplete, and inappropriate force diagrams. In addition, some students did not draw diagrams in solving the problems. Based on students’ answers, the percentage of students drawing incomplete diagrams (54% for horizontal problems and 42% for inclined problems) is higher than drawing complete diagrams (18% for horizontal problems and 35% for inclined problems). The percentage of students who drew inappropriate diagrams in solving horizontal and inclined problems is 20% and 10%, respectively. A few students (8% and 13%) did not draw diagrams for both questions. Students who drew complete diagrams tended to obtain the correct final answer. Some students who drew incomplete diagrams were not able to find the correct answers and even finish the problem. However, some students who drew incomplete diagrams could successfully solve the problem. The group of students who drew diagrams in the inappropriate category tended to demonstrate incorrect and unfinished answers. This study suggests that instructors should not only focus on the correctness of the diagrams but also focus on the completeness of diagrams drawn by students while solving the problems.","PeriodicalId":37652,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i2.43020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Force diagrams or some say free body diagrams (FBDs), as physics representations, are usually employed to teach and learn physics concepts such as force. Physics education studies indicate that the use of FBDs can support or hinder students’ performance in solving physics problems. This study aims to investigate the type of representations drawn by students and the patterns of students’ answers while solving force problems. By involving 230 preservice physics teachers, questions about the application of Newton’s laws were administered to students to elicit the patterns of students’ diagrams and answers. Results were analysed into three categories: complete, incomplete, and inappropriate force diagrams. In addition, some students did not draw diagrams in solving the problems. Based on students’ answers, the percentage of students drawing incomplete diagrams (54% for horizontal problems and 42% for inclined problems) is higher than drawing complete diagrams (18% for horizontal problems and 35% for inclined problems). The percentage of students who drew inappropriate diagrams in solving horizontal and inclined problems is 20% and 10%, respectively. A few students (8% and 13%) did not draw diagrams for both questions. Students who drew complete diagrams tended to obtain the correct final answer. Some students who drew incomplete diagrams were not able to find the correct answers and even finish the problem. However, some students who drew incomplete diagrams could successfully solve the problem. The group of students who drew diagrams in the inappropriate category tended to demonstrate incorrect and unfinished answers. This study suggests that instructors should not only focus on the correctness of the diagrams but also focus on the completeness of diagrams drawn by students while solving the problems.
物理教育学生解力题的图解与答案模式
力图或自由体图(fbd),作为物理表示,通常用于教授和学习物理概念,如力。物理教育研究表明,fbd的使用可以支持或阻碍学生解决物理问题的表现。本研究旨在探讨学生在解决力问题时所绘制的表征类型和学生的答案模式。通过230名职前物理教师,向学生提问牛顿定律的应用,以引出学生的图表模式和答案。结果分析为三种类型:完整,不完整和不适当的力图。此外,一些学生在解题时没有画图。从学生的回答来看,画不完整图的学生比例(水平题54%,倾斜题42%)高于画完整图的学生比例(水平题18%,倾斜题35%)。在解决水平题和倾斜题时,画错图的学生比例分别为20%和10%。少数学生(8%和13%)没有为两个问题都画图表。画完整图表的学生往往能得到正确的最终答案。一些画不完整的图的学生无法找到正确的答案,甚至无法完成问题。然而,一些画不完整的图的学生可以成功地解决这个问题。在不适当类别中画图表的学生倾向于展示不正确和未完成的答案。本研究建议教师在解决问题时,不仅要关注图表的正确性,更要关注学生绘制的图表的完整性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia
Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: This journal publishes original articles on the latest issues and trends occurring internationally in science curriculum, instruction, learning, policy, and preparation of science teachers with the aim to advance our knowledge of science education theory and practice. Moreover, this journal also covers the issues concerned with environmental education & environmental science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信