Influence of Media Information Sources on Vaccine Uptake: The Full and Inconsistent Mediating Role of Vaccine Hesitancy

IF 1.9 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Almudena Recio-Román, Manuel Recio-Menéndez, María Victoria Román-González
{"title":"Influence of Media Information Sources on Vaccine Uptake: The Full and Inconsistent Mediating Role of Vaccine Hesitancy","authors":"Almudena Recio-Román, Manuel Recio-Menéndez, María Victoria Román-González","doi":"10.3390/computation11100208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vaccine hesitancy is a significant public health concern, with numerous studies demonstrating its negative impact on immunization rates. One factor that can influence vaccine hesitancy is media coverage of vaccination. The media is a significant source of immunization information and can significantly shape people’s attitudes and behaviors toward vaccine uptake. Media influences vaccination positively or negatively. Accurate coverage of the benefits and effectiveness of vaccination can encourage uptake, while coverage of safety concerns or misinformation may increase hesitancy. Our study investigated whether vaccine hesitancy acts as a mediator between information sources and vaccination uptake. We analyzed a cross-sectional online survey by the European Commission of 27,524 citizens from all EU member states between 15 and 29 March 2019. The study used structural equation modeling to conduct a mediation analysis, revealing that the influence of media on vaccine uptake is fully mediated by vaccine hesitancy, except for television, which depicted an inconsistent mediating role. In other words, the effect of different media on vaccine uptake is largely driven by the extent to which individuals are hesitant or resistant to vaccinating. Therefore, media outlets, governments, and public health organizations must work together to promote accurate and reliable information about vaccination and address vaccine hesitancy.","PeriodicalId":52148,"journal":{"name":"Computation","volume":"46 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/computation11100208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy is a significant public health concern, with numerous studies demonstrating its negative impact on immunization rates. One factor that can influence vaccine hesitancy is media coverage of vaccination. The media is a significant source of immunization information and can significantly shape people’s attitudes and behaviors toward vaccine uptake. Media influences vaccination positively or negatively. Accurate coverage of the benefits and effectiveness of vaccination can encourage uptake, while coverage of safety concerns or misinformation may increase hesitancy. Our study investigated whether vaccine hesitancy acts as a mediator between information sources and vaccination uptake. We analyzed a cross-sectional online survey by the European Commission of 27,524 citizens from all EU member states between 15 and 29 March 2019. The study used structural equation modeling to conduct a mediation analysis, revealing that the influence of media on vaccine uptake is fully mediated by vaccine hesitancy, except for television, which depicted an inconsistent mediating role. In other words, the effect of different media on vaccine uptake is largely driven by the extent to which individuals are hesitant or resistant to vaccinating. Therefore, media outlets, governments, and public health organizations must work together to promote accurate and reliable information about vaccination and address vaccine hesitancy.
媒体信息来源对疫苗摄取的影响:疫苗犹豫的充分和不一致的中介作用
疫苗犹豫是一个重大的公共卫生问题,许多研究表明它对免疫接种率有负面影响。可能影响疫苗犹豫的一个因素是媒体对疫苗接种的报道。媒体是免疫信息的重要来源,可以显著影响人们对疫苗接种的态度和行为。媒体对疫苗接种有积极或消极的影响。准确报道疫苗接种的益处和有效性可以鼓励人们接受,而对安全问题或错误信息的报道可能会增加犹豫。我们的研究调查了疫苗犹豫是否在信息来源和疫苗摄取之间起中介作用。我们分析了欧盟委员会在2019年3月15日至29日期间对来自所有欧盟成员国的27,524名公民进行的横断面在线调查。本研究采用结构方程模型进行中介分析,发现除了电视对疫苗摄取的中介作用不一致外,媒介对疫苗摄取的影响完全由疫苗犹豫介导。换句话说,不同媒介对疫苗摄取的影响在很大程度上取决于个体对疫苗接种的犹豫或抵抗程度。因此,媒体机构、政府和公共卫生组织必须共同努力,促进有关疫苗接种的准确和可靠信息,并解决疫苗犹豫问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computation
Computation Mathematics-Applied Mathematics
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
201
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Computation a journal of computational science and engineering. Topics: computational biology, including, but not limited to: bioinformatics mathematical modeling, simulation and prediction of nucleic acid (DNA/RNA) and protein sequences, structure and functions mathematical modeling of pathways and genetic interactions neuroscience computation including neural modeling, brain theory and neural networks computational chemistry, including, but not limited to: new theories and methodology including their applications in molecular dynamics computation of electronic structure density functional theory designing and characterization of materials with computation method computation in engineering, including, but not limited to: new theories, methodology and the application of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) optimisation techniques and/or application of optimisation to multidisciplinary systems system identification and reduced order modelling of engineering systems parallel algorithms and high performance computing in engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信