Experiences of LGBTQ + Plastic Surgeons in the US and Canada

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q Medicine
Keeley D. Newsom, Arya A. Akhavan, Khoa D. Tran, Wendy Chen, Blair R. Peters, Gregory H. Borschel
{"title":"Experiences of LGBTQ + Plastic Surgeons in the US and Canada","authors":"Keeley D. Newsom, Arya A. Akhavan, Khoa D. Tran, Wendy Chen, Blair R. Peters, Gregory H. Borschel","doi":"10.1177/22925503231208449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The LGBTQ + community faces discrimination within the workplace, with growing evidence emerging about the mistreatment of LGBTQ + surgeon trainees. The purpose of this study was to better understand the experiences of LGBTQ + surgeons in plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS). Methods: A web-based survey was made available to all plastic surgeons who identified as LGBTQ + across the US and Canada from October 2021 to November 2022. The questionnaire used validated tools assessing “outness” and microaggressions, as well as rates of censorship of speech and/or mannerisms and experiences of discrimination. Outcomes were measured as frequencies and analyzed as a function of location (US vs Canada), gender identity (transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) versus cisgender), and level of training (attending vs in-training). Qualitative responses were also recorded. Results: A total of 43 self-identified LGBTQ + individuals engaged with the survey, 38 of which completed it (88%). Nearly all (96.8%) reported experiencing heteronormative microaggressions, 36.7% reported discrimination from plastic surgery attendings, and 73.3% censor themselves around Plastic Surgery attendings. TGD respondents were more likely to have experienced discrimination than cisgender respondents ( P < .01). One-third (33%) of respondents indicated that they hesitate to be out at their institution for fear of bias and/or discrimination. Conclusion: LGBTQ + plastic and reconstructive surgeons reported a significant amount of microaggressions, self-censorship, and discrimination while at work, and these experiences varied as a function of level of training and gender identity. PRS should strive to eliminate these mistreatments, educate its workforce, and address LGBTQ + underrepresentation within the field.","PeriodicalId":50714,"journal":{"name":"Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503231208449","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The LGBTQ + community faces discrimination within the workplace, with growing evidence emerging about the mistreatment of LGBTQ + surgeon trainees. The purpose of this study was to better understand the experiences of LGBTQ + surgeons in plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS). Methods: A web-based survey was made available to all plastic surgeons who identified as LGBTQ + across the US and Canada from October 2021 to November 2022. The questionnaire used validated tools assessing “outness” and microaggressions, as well as rates of censorship of speech and/or mannerisms and experiences of discrimination. Outcomes were measured as frequencies and analyzed as a function of location (US vs Canada), gender identity (transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) versus cisgender), and level of training (attending vs in-training). Qualitative responses were also recorded. Results: A total of 43 self-identified LGBTQ + individuals engaged with the survey, 38 of which completed it (88%). Nearly all (96.8%) reported experiencing heteronormative microaggressions, 36.7% reported discrimination from plastic surgery attendings, and 73.3% censor themselves around Plastic Surgery attendings. TGD respondents were more likely to have experienced discrimination than cisgender respondents ( P < .01). One-third (33%) of respondents indicated that they hesitate to be out at their institution for fear of bias and/or discrimination. Conclusion: LGBTQ + plastic and reconstructive surgeons reported a significant amount of microaggressions, self-censorship, and discrimination while at work, and these experiences varied as a function of level of training and gender identity. PRS should strive to eliminate these mistreatments, educate its workforce, and address LGBTQ + underrepresentation within the field.
美国和加拿大LGBTQ +整形外科医生的经验
背景:LGBTQ +群体在工作场所面临歧视,越来越多的证据表明LGBTQ +外科实习生受到虐待。本研究的目的是为了更好地了解LGBTQ +外科医生在整形和重建手术(PRS)中的经验。方法:从2021年10月到2022年11月,对美国和加拿大所有被认定为LGBTQ +的整形外科医生进行了一项基于网络的调查。问卷使用了经过验证的工具来评估“外向性”和微侵犯,以及言论和/或行为审查率和歧视经历。结果被测量为频率,并作为地点(美国vs加拿大)、性别认同(跨性别和性别多样化(TGD) vs顺性别)和培训水平(参加培训vs在培训)的函数进行分析。定性反应也被记录下来。结果:共有43名自认为LGBTQ +的人参与了调查,其中38人完成了调查(88%)。几乎所有(96.8%)的人都表示遭受过异性恋规范的微侵犯,36.7%的人表示受到整形外科医生的歧视,73.3%的人表示在整形外科医生周围会审查自己。TGD受访者比顺性别受访者更有可能遭受歧视(P <. 01)。三分之一(33%)的受访者表示,由于担心偏见和/或歧视,他们对在所在机构出柜犹豫不决。结论:LGBTQ +整形和重建外科医生在工作中报告了大量的微侵犯、自我审查和歧视,这些经历随着培训水平和性别认同的不同而变化。PRS应该努力消除这些虐待,教育其员工,并解决LGBTQ +在该领域代表性不足的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plastic Surgery
Plastic Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
0.67
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic Surgery (Chirurgie Plastique) is the official journal of the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Group for the Advancement of Microsurgery, and the Canadian Society for Surgery of the Hand. It serves as a major venue for Canadian research, society guidelines, and continuing medical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信