Institutionalized Social Entrepreneurship in Indonesia: A report on the challenges of state-driven social entrepreneurship promotion within the Five Cities' social assistance program

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Tauchid Komara Yuda, Hari Harjanto Setiawan, None Habibullah, Badrun Susantyo, Hempri Suyatna
{"title":"Institutionalized Social Entrepreneurship in Indonesia: A report on the challenges of state-driven social entrepreneurship promotion within the Five Cities' social assistance program","authors":"Tauchid Komara Yuda, Hari Harjanto Setiawan, None Habibullah, Badrun Susantyo, Hempri Suyatna","doi":"10.1080/23276665.2023.2270087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe landscape of social entrepreneurship has undergone rapid evolution within business and non-profit sectors in recent years. However, there is a more recent trend in Indonesia, where social entrepreneurship is formally practised in public policy. This new approach represents an initiative related to what we call Institutionalized Social Entrepreneurship (ISE). In this article, we investigate the challenges faced while implementing experimental measures to transform cash transfers into social entrepreneurship programs based on 43 interviews with key stakeholders and end-users spreading over five regions. Our research findings indicate a lack of shared understanding among stakeholders when implementing social entrepreneurship programs. Furthermore, the beneficiaries face difficulties distinguishing between social entrepreneurship programs and regular cash transfers, leading to ineffective program outcomes and significant challenges in achieving community development objectives. This issue is exacerbated by an unbalanced power distribution between government and non-government actors involved in program implementation, which can potentially limit the program’s effectiveness and efficiency. Its unfolding transformation of social assistance and the application of social entrepreneurship in Indonesia highlight a new deal for welfare that responds to uncertain post-pandemic circumstances. This study adds to the literature on social entrepreneurship by highlighting the complexities of the state-society relationship in ISE.KEYWORDS: Social assistanceinstitutionalized social entrepreneurshipcash transfercommunity empowerment Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data available statementThe raw data are not publicly available due to containing information that could compromise the privacy of research participants.Additional informationFundingThe author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.Notes on contributorsTauchid Komara YudaTauchid Komara Yuda is a Research Fellow at the Department of Sociology and Social Policy, Lingnan University, Hong Kong. His research focus is centred on policies and politics of welfare states changes.Hari Harjanto SetiawanHari Harjanto Setiawan is a senior researcher at the National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia. His research focuses on social entrepreneurship and development. HabibullahHabibullah is a senior researcher at the National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia. His research primarily focuses on community development, corporate social responsibility, and welfare policy.Badrun SusantyoBadrun Susantyo is senior researcher at the National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia. His research is mainly focused on welfare governance and community development.Hempri SuyatnaHempri Suyatna is an Associate Professor at the Department of Social Development & Welfare at Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia. He is currently researching social entrepreneurship, social movements, and community empowerment. He can be contacted at hempry@ugm.ac.id","PeriodicalId":43945,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration","volume":"59 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2023.2270087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe landscape of social entrepreneurship has undergone rapid evolution within business and non-profit sectors in recent years. However, there is a more recent trend in Indonesia, where social entrepreneurship is formally practised in public policy. This new approach represents an initiative related to what we call Institutionalized Social Entrepreneurship (ISE). In this article, we investigate the challenges faced while implementing experimental measures to transform cash transfers into social entrepreneurship programs based on 43 interviews with key stakeholders and end-users spreading over five regions. Our research findings indicate a lack of shared understanding among stakeholders when implementing social entrepreneurship programs. Furthermore, the beneficiaries face difficulties distinguishing between social entrepreneurship programs and regular cash transfers, leading to ineffective program outcomes and significant challenges in achieving community development objectives. This issue is exacerbated by an unbalanced power distribution between government and non-government actors involved in program implementation, which can potentially limit the program’s effectiveness and efficiency. Its unfolding transformation of social assistance and the application of social entrepreneurship in Indonesia highlight a new deal for welfare that responds to uncertain post-pandemic circumstances. This study adds to the literature on social entrepreneurship by highlighting the complexities of the state-society relationship in ISE.KEYWORDS: Social assistanceinstitutionalized social entrepreneurshipcash transfercommunity empowerment Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data available statementThe raw data are not publicly available due to containing information that could compromise the privacy of research participants.Additional informationFundingThe author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.Notes on contributorsTauchid Komara YudaTauchid Komara Yuda is a Research Fellow at the Department of Sociology and Social Policy, Lingnan University, Hong Kong. His research focus is centred on policies and politics of welfare states changes.Hari Harjanto SetiawanHari Harjanto Setiawan is a senior researcher at the National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia. His research focuses on social entrepreneurship and development. HabibullahHabibullah is a senior researcher at the National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia. His research primarily focuses on community development, corporate social responsibility, and welfare policy.Badrun SusantyoBadrun Susantyo is senior researcher at the National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia. His research is mainly focused on welfare governance and community development.Hempri SuyatnaHempri Suyatna is an Associate Professor at the Department of Social Development & Welfare at Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia. He is currently researching social entrepreneurship, social movements, and community empowerment. He can be contacted at hempry@ugm.ac.id
制度化的社会企业家精神在印度尼西亚:一份关于国家驱动的社会企业家精神在五市社会援助计划中推广的挑战的报告
摘要近年来,社会企业家精神在商业和非营利部门中经历了快速发展。然而,最近在印度尼西亚出现了一种趋势,社会企业家精神在公共政策中得到正式实践。这种新方法代表了一种与我们所说的制度化社会企业家精神(ISE)相关的倡议。在本文中,我们基于对分布在五个地区的43个主要利益相关者和最终用户的访谈,调查了在实施将现金转移支付转变为社会创业计划的实验措施时面临的挑战。我们的研究结果表明,在实施社会创业计划时,利益相关者之间缺乏共同的理解。此外,受益人难以区分社会创业项目和定期现金转移,导致项目成果无效,并在实现社区发展目标方面面临重大挑战。参与项目实施的政府和非政府行为体之间权力分配的不平衡加剧了这一问题,这可能会限制项目的有效性和效率。印度尼西亚正在进行的社会援助改革和社会企业家精神的应用突出了一项新的福利协议,以应对大流行后不确定的情况。这项研究通过强调ISE国家-社会关系的复杂性,增加了关于社会企业家精神的文献。关键词:社会救助制度化社会企业家精神现金转移社区赋权披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。数据可用声明原始数据不公开,因为包含可能损害研究参与者隐私的信息。作者在研究、撰写和/或发表这篇文章时没有得到任何经济支持。本文作者是香港岭南大学社会及社会政策学系研究员。他的研究重点集中在福利国家的政策和政治变化。Hari Harjanto Setiawan是印度尼西亚国家研究与创新局的高级研究员。他的研究重点是社会创业和社会发展。habibullah是印度尼西亚国家研究与创新局的高级研究员。他的研究主要集中在社区发展、企业社会责任和福利政策。Badrun Susantyo是印度尼西亚国家研究与创新局的高级研究员。他的研究主要集中在福利治理和社区发展。Hempri Suyatna,印度尼西亚Gadjah Mada大学社会发展与福利系副教授。他目前正在研究社会创业、社会运动和社区赋权。可以通过hempry@ugm.ac.id与他联系
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
20.70%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信