Firm Size and Productivity in the Informal Sector: Evidence from India

Lokesh Posti, Abhradeep Maiti
{"title":"Firm Size and Productivity in the Informal Sector: Evidence from India","authors":"Lokesh Posti, Abhradeep Maiti","doi":"10.1177/00194662231202088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study analyses the debate around the ambiguous relationship between firm size and performance. We explore how productivity varies across firm sizes in the informal sector, where firm size is sensitive to formal regulations. Additionally, the study also looks into the informal firms’ quantity and quality of employment by observing wage and performance dispersion across firm sizes, thus indicating capital accumulation and exploitation. Considering the data limitations, a pseudo-panel data design was adopted by combining the three, only available, independent cross-sectional surveys by the National Sample Survey Office, spanning from 1999–2000 to 2015–2016. Potential issues such as time-invariant unobserved firm-level heterogeneity were accounted for by using panel random effects regression. Using total firm employment and total factor productivity as the primary measures of firm size and performance, we find a positive relationship between the two across all major industries. Our results stand robust against alternative firm size and performance measures. However, this positive association between size and performance indicated capital accumulation (increasing productivity with increasing size) at the expense of labour exploitation (stagnant wages across firm sizes). The obtained findings convey important policy implications for adopting a carrot-and-stick approach for the gradual formalisation of the economy. JEL Codes: D22, L25, O25","PeriodicalId":85705,"journal":{"name":"The Indian economic journal : the quarterly journal of the Indian Economic Association","volume":"SE-9 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Indian economic journal : the quarterly journal of the Indian Economic Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00194662231202088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study analyses the debate around the ambiguous relationship between firm size and performance. We explore how productivity varies across firm sizes in the informal sector, where firm size is sensitive to formal regulations. Additionally, the study also looks into the informal firms’ quantity and quality of employment by observing wage and performance dispersion across firm sizes, thus indicating capital accumulation and exploitation. Considering the data limitations, a pseudo-panel data design was adopted by combining the three, only available, independent cross-sectional surveys by the National Sample Survey Office, spanning from 1999–2000 to 2015–2016. Potential issues such as time-invariant unobserved firm-level heterogeneity were accounted for by using panel random effects regression. Using total firm employment and total factor productivity as the primary measures of firm size and performance, we find a positive relationship between the two across all major industries. Our results stand robust against alternative firm size and performance measures. However, this positive association between size and performance indicated capital accumulation (increasing productivity with increasing size) at the expense of labour exploitation (stagnant wages across firm sizes). The obtained findings convey important policy implications for adopting a carrot-and-stick approach for the gradual formalisation of the economy. JEL Codes: D22, L25, O25
非正式部门的企业规模和生产率:来自印度的证据
本研究分析了围绕企业规模与绩效之间模糊关系的争论。我们探讨了在非正式部门中,企业规模对正式法规敏感的不同企业规模的生产率如何变化。此外,该研究还通过观察不同企业规模的工资和绩效差异来研究非正规企业就业的数量和质量,从而表明资本积累和剥削。考虑到数据的局限性,采用伪面板数据设计,将国家抽样调查办公室1999-2000年至2015-2016年期间仅有的三份独立横断面调查结合起来。潜在的问题,如时间不变的未观察到的公司层面的异质性被解释为使用面板随机效应回归。利用企业总就业和全要素生产率作为衡量企业规模和绩效的主要指标,我们发现两者在所有主要行业之间都存在正相关关系。我们的研究结果与其他公司规模和业绩指标相抗衡。然而,这种规模与绩效之间的正相关关系表明,资本积累(随着规模的扩大而提高生产率)是以劳动剥削为代价的(企业规模之间的工资停滞不前)。所获得的研究结果对采取胡萝卜加大棒的方法逐步实现经济正规化具有重要的政策意义。JEL代码:D22, L25, O25
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信