Risk factors for brain injury in patients with exertional heatstroke: A 5-year experience

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Li Zhong , Ming Wu , Zhe-Ying Liu , Yan Liu , Zhi-Feng Liu
{"title":"Risk factors for brain injury in patients with exertional heatstroke: A 5-year experience","authors":"Li Zhong ,&nbsp;Ming Wu ,&nbsp;Zhe-Ying Liu ,&nbsp;Yan Liu ,&nbsp;Zhi-Feng Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.cjtee.2023.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Minimal data exist on brain injury in patients with exertional heatstroke (EHS) in developing country. In this study, we explored the risk factors for brain injury induced by EHS 90-day after onset.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective cohort study of patients with EHS was conducted in the intensive care unit of the General Hospital of Southern Theater Command of PLA in China from April 2014 to June 2019. Patients were divided into non-brain injury (fully recovered) and brain injury groups (comprising deceased patients or those with neurological sequelae). The brain injury group was further subdivided into a death group and a sequela group for detailed analysis. General information, neurological performance and information on important organ injuries in the acute stage were recorded and analysed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for brain injury after EHS and mortality risk factors for brain injury, and Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to evaluate the effect of the neurological dysfunction on survival.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of the 147 EHS patients, 117 were enrolled, of which 96 (82.1%) recovered, 13 (11.1%) died, and 8 (6.8%) experienced neurological sequelae. Statistically significant differences were found between non-brain injury and brain injury groups in age, hypotension, duration of consciousness disorders, time to drop core body temperature below 38.5°C, lymphocyte counts, platelet counts, procalcitonin, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, creatinine, cystatin C, coagulation parameters, international normalized ratio, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II scores, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores, and Glasgow coma scale scores (all <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression showed that age (<em>OR</em> = 1.090, 95% <em>CI</em>: 1.02 − 1.17, <em>p</em> = 0.008), time to drop core temperature (<em>OR</em> = 8.223, 95% <em>CI</em>: 2.30 − 29.40, <em>p</em> = 0.001), and SOFA scores (<em>OR</em> = 1.676, 95% <em>CI</em>: 1.29 − 2.18, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) are independent risk factors for brain injury induced by EHS. The Kaplan-Meier curves suggest significantly prolonged survival (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) in patients with early Glasgow coma scale score &gt; 8 and duration of consciousness disorders ≤ 24 h.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Advanced age, delayed cooling, and higher SOFA scores significantly increase the risk of brain injury post-EHS. These findings underscore the importance of rapid cooling and early assessment of organ failure to improve outcomes in EHS patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51555,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Traumatology","volume":"27 2","pages":"Pages 91-96"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1008127523001013/pdfft?md5=cd4fbcd96e1695609ce12fffe0c97c9b&pid=1-s2.0-S1008127523001013-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1008127523001013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Minimal data exist on brain injury in patients with exertional heatstroke (EHS) in developing country. In this study, we explored the risk factors for brain injury induced by EHS 90-day after onset.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of patients with EHS was conducted in the intensive care unit of the General Hospital of Southern Theater Command of PLA in China from April 2014 to June 2019. Patients were divided into non-brain injury (fully recovered) and brain injury groups (comprising deceased patients or those with neurological sequelae). The brain injury group was further subdivided into a death group and a sequela group for detailed analysis. General information, neurological performance and information on important organ injuries in the acute stage were recorded and analysed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for brain injury after EHS and mortality risk factors for brain injury, and Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to evaluate the effect of the neurological dysfunction on survival.

Results

Out of the 147 EHS patients, 117 were enrolled, of which 96 (82.1%) recovered, 13 (11.1%) died, and 8 (6.8%) experienced neurological sequelae. Statistically significant differences were found between non-brain injury and brain injury groups in age, hypotension, duration of consciousness disorders, time to drop core body temperature below 38.5°C, lymphocyte counts, platelet counts, procalcitonin, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, creatinine, cystatin C, coagulation parameters, international normalized ratio, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II scores, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores, and Glasgow coma scale scores (all p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression showed that age (OR = 1.090, 95% CI: 1.02 − 1.17, p = 0.008), time to drop core temperature (OR = 8.223, 95% CI: 2.30 − 29.40, p = 0.001), and SOFA scores (OR = 1.676, 95% CI: 1.29 − 2.18, p < 0.001) are independent risk factors for brain injury induced by EHS. The Kaplan-Meier curves suggest significantly prolonged survival (p < 0.001) in patients with early Glasgow coma scale score > 8 and duration of consciousness disorders ≤ 24 h.

Conclusions

Advanced age, delayed cooling, and higher SOFA scores significantly increase the risk of brain injury post-EHS. These findings underscore the importance of rapid cooling and early assessment of organ failure to improve outcomes in EHS patients.

劳累性中暑患者脑损伤的风险因素:5 年的经验
目的 关于发展中国家劳累性中暑(EHS)患者脑损伤的数据极少。方法2014年4月至2019年6月,中国人民解放军南部战区司令部总医院重症监护室对EHS患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。患者被分为非脑损伤组(完全康复)和脑损伤组(包括死亡患者或有神经系统后遗症的患者)。脑损伤组又分为死亡组和后遗症组,以便进行详细分析。记录并分析了急性期的一般信息、神经系统表现和重要器官损伤信息。采用多变量逻辑回归确定 EHS 后脑损伤的危险因素和脑损伤的死亡危险因素,并采用 Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线评估神经功能障碍对生存的影响。结果在 147 例 EHS 患者中,有 117 例入选,其中 96 例(82.1%)痊愈,13 例(11.1%)死亡,8 例(6.8%)出现神经系统后遗症。非脑损伤组和脑损伤组在年龄、低血压、意识障碍持续时间、核心体温降至 38.5°C、淋巴细胞计数、血小板计数、降钙素原、丙氨酸氨基转移酶、天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶、肌酐、胱抑素 C、凝血参数、国际标准化比值、急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II 评分、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分和格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分(均为 p <0.05)。多变量逻辑回归显示,年龄(OR = 1.090,95% CI:1.02 - 1.17,p = 0.008)、核心体温下降时间(OR = 8.223,95% CI:2.30 - 29.40,p = 0.001)和 SOFA 评分(OR = 1.676,95% CI:1.29 - 2.18,p <0.001)是 EHS 引起脑损伤的独立危险因素。Kaplan-Meier曲线显示,早期格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为8分、意识障碍持续时间≤24小时的患者存活时间明显延长(p <0.001)。这些发现强调了快速降温和早期评估器官衰竭对改善 EHS 患者预后的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1707
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Traumatology (CJT, ISSN 1008-1275) was launched in 1998 and is a peer-reviewed English journal authorized by Chinese Association of Trauma, Chinese Medical Association. It is multidisciplinary and designed to provide the most current and relevant information for both the clinical and basic research in the field of traumatic medicine. CJT primarily publishes expert forums, original papers, case reports and so on. Topics cover trauma system and management, surgical procedures, acute care, rehabilitation, post-traumatic complications, translational medicine, traffic medicine and other related areas. The journal especially emphasizes clinical application, technique, surgical video, guideline, recommendations for more effective surgical approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信