Barriers to access to psychiatric medications in Missouri county jails

Jessica K. Burval, Courtney A. Iuppa, Carrie R. Kriz, Shelby E. Lang, Leigh Anne Nelson, Nicole A. Gramlich, Ellie S. R. Elliott, Roger W. Sommi
{"title":"Barriers to access to psychiatric medications in Missouri county jails","authors":"Jessica K. Burval, Courtney A. Iuppa, Carrie R. Kriz, Shelby E. Lang, Leigh Anne Nelson, Nicole A. Gramlich, Ellie S. R. Elliott, Roger W. Sommi","doi":"10.9740/mhc.2023.10.200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Objectives of this study were to characterize barriers to receiving psychiatric medications for people who are incarcerated, to compare barriers before competency restoration to those after competency restoration, and to characterize psychiatric medication formularies. Methods A survey of county jails in Missouri was completed between October 2021 and February 2022. Survey questions were answered by medical department personnel, nurses, or a person responsible for medication oversight. Formularies were requested. Results Of 97 jails contacted, 51 completed the survey (53%). Most jails allowed patients to supply their own medications and reported they were “often” or “always” able to continue home medications. Inability to provide home medications was frequently attributed to cost. Notably, only 57% of jails were able to provide long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIA), 22% charged a fee for administration of medications, and 31% would not adjust medication times based on food requirements. No major differences existed precompetency and postcompetency for any question. Discussion Jail policies varied; thus, medication access for patients should be approached at the individual level. Potential areas to target to improve access are medication administration times, LAIA access, and removal of medication administration fees.","PeriodicalId":22710,"journal":{"name":"The Mental Health Clinician","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Mental Health Clinician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2023.10.200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Objectives of this study were to characterize barriers to receiving psychiatric medications for people who are incarcerated, to compare barriers before competency restoration to those after competency restoration, and to characterize psychiatric medication formularies. Methods A survey of county jails in Missouri was completed between October 2021 and February 2022. Survey questions were answered by medical department personnel, nurses, or a person responsible for medication oversight. Formularies were requested. Results Of 97 jails contacted, 51 completed the survey (53%). Most jails allowed patients to supply their own medications and reported they were “often” or “always” able to continue home medications. Inability to provide home medications was frequently attributed to cost. Notably, only 57% of jails were able to provide long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIA), 22% charged a fee for administration of medications, and 31% would not adjust medication times based on food requirements. No major differences existed precompetency and postcompetency for any question. Discussion Jail policies varied; thus, medication access for patients should be approached at the individual level. Potential areas to target to improve access are medication administration times, LAIA access, and removal of medication administration fees.
密苏里县监狱中获得精神药物的障碍
摘要:本研究的目的是表征在押人员接受精神药物治疗的障碍,比较能力恢复前和能力恢复后的障碍,以及表征精神药物处方。方法于2021年10月至2022年2月对密苏里州县监狱进行调查。调查问题由医疗部门人员、护士或负责药物监督的人员回答。要求提供公式册。结果在联系的97所监狱中,51所完成了调查(53%)。大多数监狱允许病人自己提供药物,并报告说他们“经常”或“总是”能够继续在家服药。无法提供家庭药物治疗经常归咎于费用问题。值得注意的是,只有57%的监狱能够提供长效注射抗精神病药物(LAIA), 22%的监狱收取药物管理费用,31%的监狱不会根据食物需求调整用药时间。前胜任力与后胜任力在各问题上均无显著差异。监狱政策各不相同;因此,患者的药物获取应在个人层面进行。改善可及性的潜在目标领域是药物管理时间、LAIA的可及性和取消药物管理费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信