{"title":"Quality assessment of the Topo-Iberia CGPS stations and data quality's effects on postfit ionosphere-free phase residuals","authors":"Juan A. García-Armenteros","doi":"10.1016/j.geog.2023.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzed GPS data from the Topo-Iberia network spanning almost 12 years (2008–2020). The data quality information for all 26 Topo-Iberia stations is provided for the first time, complementing the Spanish Geological Survey's storage work. Data analyses based on quality indicators obtained using TEQC have been carried out. The guidelines and data quality information from the IGS stations have been considered as the quality references, with the stations ALJI, EPCU, and TIOU standing out as the worst stations, while on the contrary, FUEN, PALM, PILA, and TRIA meet the quality requirements to become an IGS station. The relationship between the GPS data quality and their GAMIT- and GipsyX-derived postfit ionosphere-free phase residuals has also been investigated, and the results reveal an inversely proportional relationship. It has been found that the stations showing an increase in elevation of the horizon line, also show an increase in cycle slips and multipath, are among the poorest quality stations, and among those with the highest postfit RMS of phase residuals. Moreover, the evolution of the vegetation around the antenna should be considered as it could cause a progressive loss of quality, which is not complying with the IGS standards. The quality assessment shows that the Topo-Iberia stations are appropriate for geodetic purposes, but permanent monitoring would be necessary to avoid the least possible loss of data and quality. In addition, a method to characterize the GNSS data quality is proposed.","PeriodicalId":46398,"journal":{"name":"Geodesy and Geodynamics","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geodesy and Geodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2023.07.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper analyzed GPS data from the Topo-Iberia network spanning almost 12 years (2008–2020). The data quality information for all 26 Topo-Iberia stations is provided for the first time, complementing the Spanish Geological Survey's storage work. Data analyses based on quality indicators obtained using TEQC have been carried out. The guidelines and data quality information from the IGS stations have been considered as the quality references, with the stations ALJI, EPCU, and TIOU standing out as the worst stations, while on the contrary, FUEN, PALM, PILA, and TRIA meet the quality requirements to become an IGS station. The relationship between the GPS data quality and their GAMIT- and GipsyX-derived postfit ionosphere-free phase residuals has also been investigated, and the results reveal an inversely proportional relationship. It has been found that the stations showing an increase in elevation of the horizon line, also show an increase in cycle slips and multipath, are among the poorest quality stations, and among those with the highest postfit RMS of phase residuals. Moreover, the evolution of the vegetation around the antenna should be considered as it could cause a progressive loss of quality, which is not complying with the IGS standards. The quality assessment shows that the Topo-Iberia stations are appropriate for geodetic purposes, but permanent monitoring would be necessary to avoid the least possible loss of data and quality. In addition, a method to characterize the GNSS data quality is proposed.
期刊介绍:
Geodesy and Geodynamics launched in October, 2010, and is a bimonthly publication. It is sponsored jointly by Institute of Seismology, China Earthquake Administration, Science Press, and another six agencies. It is an international journal with a Chinese heart. Geodesy and Geodynamics is committed to the publication of quality scientific papers in English in the fields of geodesy and geodynamics from authors around the world. Its aim is to promote a combination between Geodesy and Geodynamics, deepen the application of Geodesy in the field of Geoscience and quicken worldwide fellows'' understanding on scientific research activity in China. It mainly publishes newest research achievements in the field of Geodesy, Geodynamics, Science of Disaster and so on. Aims and Scope: new theories and methods of geodesy; new results of monitoring and studying crustal movement and deformation by using geodetic theories and methods; new ways and achievements in earthquake-prediction investigation by using geodetic theories and methods; new results of crustal movement and deformation studies by using other geologic, hydrological, and geophysical theories and methods; new results of satellite gravity measurements; new development and results of space-to-ground observation technology.