Inter-Rater Reliability Regarding the Radiolucencies Associated with the Second Molar Adjacent an Impacted Third Mandibular Molar

Muhammad Taha Qamar, Mariah Muhammad Ashraf, Bakhtawar Zahid, Amina Nawaz, Abraiz Azhar, Darab Fatima Babry
{"title":"Inter-Rater Reliability Regarding the Radiolucencies Associated with the Second Molar Adjacent an Impacted Third Mandibular Molar","authors":"Muhammad Taha Qamar, Mariah Muhammad Ashraf, Bakhtawar Zahid, Amina Nawaz, Abraiz Azhar, Darab Fatima Babry","doi":"10.37762/jgmds.10-4.512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES To assess the inter-rater reliability regarding the radiolucencies associated with a second molar adjacent to an impacted third molar. METHODOLOGY A cross-sectional comparative study was conducted in the College of Dentistry, Sharif Medical and Dental College, Lahore, in which dentists from four different specialities, namely; Oral Pathology, Endodontics, Prosthodontics and Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, were included as raters. 21 Orthopantomograms were assigned to each rater for assessing radiolucencies associated with a second molar adjacent to an impacted third molar. RESULTSThe level of agreement regarding the radiolucencies associated with the second molar observed on the Orthopantomograms between rater 1 with rater 2 (κ=0.158., p=0.036) and rater 1 with rater 3 (κ=0.139, p=1.000) was very weak but was fair between rater1 and 4 (κ=0.271, p=0.200). CONCLUSION The only radiolucency that rater one observed was external root resorption. Rater 2 identified one case of radiolucency as dental caries and another as caries and periapical radiolucency that were identified by Rater 1 as external resorption; hence they had a weak agreement between Rater 1 and Rater 2 regarding the radiolucencies associated with second molars. Rater 3 identified radiolucencies owing to caries which were reported to be radiolucency due to external resorption by rater 1, and this agreement was weak. Most radiolucencies determined by rater 1 as external resorption were reported to be external resorption by rater 4, resulting in a fair agreement between rater 1 and 4.","PeriodicalId":484278,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gandhara medical and dental sciences","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gandhara medical and dental sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37762/jgmds.10-4.512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES To assess the inter-rater reliability regarding the radiolucencies associated with a second molar adjacent to an impacted third molar. METHODOLOGY A cross-sectional comparative study was conducted in the College of Dentistry, Sharif Medical and Dental College, Lahore, in which dentists from four different specialities, namely; Oral Pathology, Endodontics, Prosthodontics and Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, were included as raters. 21 Orthopantomograms were assigned to each rater for assessing radiolucencies associated with a second molar adjacent to an impacted third molar. RESULTSThe level of agreement regarding the radiolucencies associated with the second molar observed on the Orthopantomograms between rater 1 with rater 2 (κ=0.158., p=0.036) and rater 1 with rater 3 (κ=0.139, p=1.000) was very weak but was fair between rater1 and 4 (κ=0.271, p=0.200). CONCLUSION The only radiolucency that rater one observed was external root resorption. Rater 2 identified one case of radiolucency as dental caries and another as caries and periapical radiolucency that were identified by Rater 1 as external resorption; hence they had a weak agreement between Rater 1 and Rater 2 regarding the radiolucencies associated with second molars. Rater 3 identified radiolucencies owing to caries which were reported to be radiolucency due to external resorption by rater 1, and this agreement was weak. Most radiolucencies determined by rater 1 as external resorption were reported to be external resorption by rater 4, resulting in a fair agreement between rater 1 and 4.
下颌第二磨牙邻近阻生第三磨牙放射率的可靠性研究
目的:评估第二磨牙与第三磨牙相邻时放射率的可靠性。方法在拉合尔谢里夫医学和牙科学院牙科学院进行了横断面比较研究,其中来自四个不同专业的牙医,即;包括口腔病理学、牙髓学、口腔修复学和口腔颌面外科。对每个评分者进行21张骨科断层摄影,以评估与第三磨牙相邻的第二磨牙相关的辐射率。结果两组患者的第二磨牙放射率在正骨断层扫描上的吻合程度为(κ=0.158)。(p=0.036)和rater1与rater 3 (κ=0.139, p=1.000)的相关性非常弱,但在rater1与rater 4 (κ=0.271, p=0.200)之间的相关性一般。结论第1次观察到的透光率仅为外根吸收。第2组将一例放射透光鉴定为龋齿,另一例为龋齿和根尖周放射透光,第1组将其鉴定为外部吸收;因此,在与第二磨牙相关的辐射率方面,第一和第二磨牙的辐射率基本一致。Rater 3确定了由于龋病而产生的辐射透光度,而Rater 1报告的是由于外部吸收而产生的辐射透光度,这种一致性很弱。据报道,由倍率率1确定为外部吸收的大多数辐射率为倍率率4的外部吸收,从而使倍率率1和倍率率4之间相当一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信