Shaping geriatric practice: evaluating Beers, PRISCUS, and European Union(7) criteria for optimal patient care. A retrospective study

Shikha Sood, Nidhi Saija, Devang Rana, Kanisha Shah, Hirva Santoki, Vipul Prajapati
{"title":"Shaping geriatric practice: evaluating Beers, PRISCUS, and European Union(7) criteria for optimal patient care. A retrospective study","authors":"Shikha Sood, Nidhi Saija, Devang Rana, Kanisha Shah, Hirva Santoki, Vipul Prajapati","doi":"10.4081/gc.2023.11597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Medications whose risk of adverse drug events exceeds their expected clinical benefit when given to older patients are called potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). The geriatric population represents about 10% of the world population and 7% of the Indian population and consumes 40% of prescription and 35% of all over-the-counter drugs. That is why it is necessary to evaluate the use of PIMs in the geriatric population. This study aimed to evaluate prescriptions for PIMs by using three pre-validated and internationally used criteria, namely the Beers criteria (2019), the European Union (EU)(7) list (2015), and the PRISCUS list (2010). A retrospective observational study began after obtaining written approval from the institutional review board. Demographic and clinical profiles and patients' complete prescriptions were recorded, and the Beers criteria (2019), the EU(7) (2015) list, and the PRISCUS list (2010) were applied. A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 345 patients, with a mean age of 71.48 years, were included in the study. Vitamin D3 (56.81%) was frequently prescribed as medicine. According to the Beers, EU(7), and PRISCUS criteria, PIMs were 311 (11.26%), 272 (9.85%), and 105 (3.80%), respectively. Pantoprazole [20.57% Beers and 23.52% EU(7)] and glimepiride [15.43% Beers and 17.64% EU(7)] were the most inappropriate drugs. According to the PRISCUS list, piroxicam (21.9%) and etoricoxib (19.04%) were the inappropriate drugs. According to the Beers, EU(7), and PRISCUS criteria, total inappropriate prescriptions containing at least one PIM are 183 (52.04%), 174 (50.43%), and 88 (25.5%), respectively. The number of prescriptions with inappropriate medication is highly correlated with the total number of drugs prescribed per prescription (p<0.01) and the total number of fixed-dose combinations (p<0.01). Maximum PIMs were found with the Beers criteria and minimum PIMs with the PRISCUS list. This study shows that the prescription of PIMs ranges from 25.5 to 52.04%. The EU(7) list had the highest sensitivity (63.66%), while the PRISCUS list had the highest specificity (98.48%) to detect PIMs with the Beers criteria taken as a reference.","PeriodicalId":30930,"journal":{"name":"Geriatric Care","volume":"9 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatric Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/gc.2023.11597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medications whose risk of adverse drug events exceeds their expected clinical benefit when given to older patients are called potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). The geriatric population represents about 10% of the world population and 7% of the Indian population and consumes 40% of prescription and 35% of all over-the-counter drugs. That is why it is necessary to evaluate the use of PIMs in the geriatric population. This study aimed to evaluate prescriptions for PIMs by using three pre-validated and internationally used criteria, namely the Beers criteria (2019), the European Union (EU)(7) list (2015), and the PRISCUS list (2010). A retrospective observational study began after obtaining written approval from the institutional review board. Demographic and clinical profiles and patients' complete prescriptions were recorded, and the Beers criteria (2019), the EU(7) (2015) list, and the PRISCUS list (2010) were applied. A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 345 patients, with a mean age of 71.48 years, were included in the study. Vitamin D3 (56.81%) was frequently prescribed as medicine. According to the Beers, EU(7), and PRISCUS criteria, PIMs were 311 (11.26%), 272 (9.85%), and 105 (3.80%), respectively. Pantoprazole [20.57% Beers and 23.52% EU(7)] and glimepiride [15.43% Beers and 17.64% EU(7)] were the most inappropriate drugs. According to the PRISCUS list, piroxicam (21.9%) and etoricoxib (19.04%) were the inappropriate drugs. According to the Beers, EU(7), and PRISCUS criteria, total inappropriate prescriptions containing at least one PIM are 183 (52.04%), 174 (50.43%), and 88 (25.5%), respectively. The number of prescriptions with inappropriate medication is highly correlated with the total number of drugs prescribed per prescription (p<0.01) and the total number of fixed-dose combinations (p<0.01). Maximum PIMs were found with the Beers criteria and minimum PIMs with the PRISCUS list. This study shows that the prescription of PIMs ranges from 25.5 to 52.04%. The EU(7) list had the highest sensitivity (63.66%), while the PRISCUS list had the highest specificity (98.48%) to detect PIMs with the Beers criteria taken as a reference.
塑造老年实践:评估比尔斯,普锐斯和欧盟(7)标准的最佳病人护理。回顾性研究
给老年患者使用的药物,其不良事件的风险超过其预期的临床获益,被称为潜在不适当药物(PIMs)。老年人口约占世界人口的10%,占印度人口的7%,消耗了40%的处方药和35%的非处方药。这就是为什么有必要评估在老年人群中使用pim的原因。本研究旨在通过三个预先验证的国际通用标准,即比尔斯标准(2019)、欧盟(EU)(7)清单(2015)和PRISCUS清单(2010),对pim处方进行评价。在获得机构审查委员会的书面批准后,开始进行回顾性观察性研究。记录人口统计学和临床概况以及患者的完整处方,并应用Beers标准(2019)、EU(7)(2015)清单和PRISCUS清单(2010)。0.05认为有统计学意义。共纳入345例患者,平均年龄71.48岁。维生素D3(56.81%)是常用的处方药。根据Beers、EU(7)和PRISCUS标准,pim分别为311(11.26%)、272(9.85%)和105(3.80%)。泮托拉唑[20.57% Beers和23.52% EU(7)]和格列美脲[15.43% Beers和17.64% EU(7)]是最不适宜的药物。根据PRISCUS清单,吡罗昔康(21.9%)和依托昔布(19.04%)是不适宜用药。根据Beers、EU(7)和PRISCUS标准,含有至少一种PIM的不当处方分别为183张(52.04%)、174张(50.43%)和88张(25.5%)。不当用药处方数与单张处方总用药数(p<0.01)和固定剂量组合总用药数(p<0.01)高度相关。以Beers标准发现最大的pim,以PRISCUS列表发现最小的pim。本研究表明,pim的处方范围为25.5% ~ 52.04%。参考Beers标准,EU(7)清单检测pim的灵敏度最高(63.66%),PRISCUS清单检测pim的特异度最高(98.48%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信