Measuring the Independence of Community Development and Empowerment Programs (PPM) in Coal Mining Companies

Q4 Social Sciences

Journal of Social Research and Policy Pub Date : 2023-10-23 DOI:10.55324/josr.v2i11.1499

Giwa Giwangkara, Nunuk Andriastuti

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The coal industry is a relatively capital-intensive industry and has a relatively high level of social risk. In addition, the coal industry also has limited time because it depends on the amount of coal reserves. One of the social risk mitigations coal companies carry is conducting community development and empowerment programs (PPM). In measuring the level of maturity or independence of PPM programs, an approach is used by measuring scores from six dimensions, namely change, inclusive, organized, cooperation, influential, and sustainability. In this study, companies A and B differ in the level of independence of their flagship programs. The integrated farming program in company A has the smallest independence score of 5.76. While in company B, the cattle breeding program has the smallest independence value of 8.46.

查看原文本刊更多论文

衡量煤矿公司社区发展和赋权计划(PPM)的独立性

煤炭行业是资本相对密集的行业，社会风险水平较高。此外，煤炭行业的时间也很有限，因为它取决于煤炭储量的多少。煤炭公司承担的社会风险缓解措施之一是开展社区发展和赋权项目(PPM)。在度量PPM项目的成熟度或独立性水平时，使用了一种方法，通过度量六个维度的分数，即变化、包容性、组织性、合作性、影响力和可持续性。在本研究中，A公司和B公司在其旗舰项目的独立性水平上存在差异。A公司综合养殖项目的独立性得分最低，为5.76分。而在B公司，养牛项目的独立性值最小，为8.46。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Social Research and Policy Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

8 weeks

期刊介绍： Welfare states have made well-being one of the main focuses of public policies. Social policies entail, however, complicated, and sometimes almost insurmountable, issues of prioritization, measurement, problem evaluation or strategic and technical decision making concerning aim-setting or finding the most adequate means to ends. Given the pressures to effectiveness it is no wonder that the last several decades have witnessed the imposition of research-based social policies as standard as well as the development of policy-oriented research methodologies. Legitimate social policies are, in this context, more and more dependent on the accurate use of diagnostic methods, of sophisticated program evaluation approaches, of benchmarking and so on. Inspired by this acute interest, our journal aims to host primarily articles based on policy research and methodological approaches of policy topics. Our journal is open to sociologically informed contributions from anthropologists, psychologists, statisticians, economists, historians and political scientists. General theoretical papers are also welcomed if do not deviate from the interests stated above. The editors also welcome reviews of books that are relevant to the topics covered in the journal.