Romantic relationships during the COVID-19 pandemic: Stressors, dyadic coping, and conflict resolution

ShyamolimaGhosh Choudhury, Shweta Chaudhary, Poonam Phogat
{"title":"Romantic relationships during the COVID-19 pandemic: Stressors, dyadic coping, and conflict resolution","authors":"ShyamolimaGhosh Choudhury, Shweta Chaudhary, Poonam Phogat","doi":"10.4103/iopn.iopn_10_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The coronavirus pandemic and the resultant lockdown had been harsh on many people especially those in romantic relationships. There was increase in psychological issues such as anxiety, stress, depression, alcoholism, and problematic eating behaviors which resulted in conflicts and breakdown in relationships. Aim and Objectives: The present cross-sectional exploratory study investigated how individuals in romantic dating relationships have coped during the times of COVID-19. The objectives were to examine the stressors faced by romantic dating couples during the pandemic, the differences among them with respect to dyadic coping, conflict, and resolution strategies employed. Materials and Methods: A total of 232 individuals (males = 104, females = 128) were assessed on a semi-structured Stressor Checklist, the Dyadic Coping Inventory, and Romantic Partner Conflict Scale. Descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation, ANOVA, and Tukey's honestly significant difference were calculated. Results: 45% of participants reported growing closer to their partners during the pandemic; others reported strained relationships or break-ups. Distance, difficulty in in-person meetings, reduced communication emerged as the most reported stressors among participants. Dyadic coping was found to be significantly better in the closer group than in the strained group or the break-up group (t = −1.89,P< 0.05). Stress communication by partner was found to be significantly better in closer couples (t = −2.38,P< 0.01). With respect to conflict resolution, significant differences were found among the three groups on compromise (r = 0.459,P< 0.01) avoidance (r = 0.224,P< 0.01), interactional reactivity (r= −0.446,P< 0.01), domination (r = −0.223,P< 0.01), and submission (r = −0.491,P< 0.01). No difference was found among the groups on separation (r = −0.07; NS). Conclusion: Individuals who found themselves in strained relationships or breakups during COVID-19 attributed negative outcome in relationship to factors internal to the relationship. Individuals with positive relationship outcomes engaged in positive dyadic coping; conflict resolution strategies employed by them were positive. The limitations, mental health implications and suggestions for further research have been discussed.","PeriodicalId":484047,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of psychiatric nursing","volume":"268 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of psychiatric nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/iopn.iopn_10_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The coronavirus pandemic and the resultant lockdown had been harsh on many people especially those in romantic relationships. There was increase in psychological issues such as anxiety, stress, depression, alcoholism, and problematic eating behaviors which resulted in conflicts and breakdown in relationships. Aim and Objectives: The present cross-sectional exploratory study investigated how individuals in romantic dating relationships have coped during the times of COVID-19. The objectives were to examine the stressors faced by romantic dating couples during the pandemic, the differences among them with respect to dyadic coping, conflict, and resolution strategies employed. Materials and Methods: A total of 232 individuals (males = 104, females = 128) were assessed on a semi-structured Stressor Checklist, the Dyadic Coping Inventory, and Romantic Partner Conflict Scale. Descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation, ANOVA, and Tukey's honestly significant difference were calculated. Results: 45% of participants reported growing closer to their partners during the pandemic; others reported strained relationships or break-ups. Distance, difficulty in in-person meetings, reduced communication emerged as the most reported stressors among participants. Dyadic coping was found to be significantly better in the closer group than in the strained group or the break-up group (t = −1.89,P< 0.05). Stress communication by partner was found to be significantly better in closer couples (t = −2.38,P< 0.01). With respect to conflict resolution, significant differences were found among the three groups on compromise (r = 0.459,P< 0.01) avoidance (r = 0.224,P< 0.01), interactional reactivity (r= −0.446,P< 0.01), domination (r = −0.223,P< 0.01), and submission (r = −0.491,P< 0.01). No difference was found among the groups on separation (r = −0.07; NS). Conclusion: Individuals who found themselves in strained relationships or breakups during COVID-19 attributed negative outcome in relationship to factors internal to the relationship. Individuals with positive relationship outcomes engaged in positive dyadic coping; conflict resolution strategies employed by them were positive. The limitations, mental health implications and suggestions for further research have been discussed.
COVID-19大流行期间的恋爱关系:压力源、二元应对和冲突解决
导读:冠状病毒大流行和随之而来的封锁对许多人来说都是严酷的,尤其是那些有恋爱关系的人。心理问题增加,如焦虑、压力、抑郁、酗酒和有问题的饮食行为,导致冲突和关系破裂。目的和目的:本横断面探索性研究调查了恋爱关系中的个体在COVID-19期间是如何应对的。目的是研究大流行期间浪漫约会伴侣面临的压力源,以及他们在采用的二元应对、冲突和解决策略方面的差异。材料与方法:对232人(男104人,女128人)进行半结构化压力源量表、二元应对量表和恋人冲突量表的评估。计算描述性统计、Pearson相关、方差分析和Tukey诚实显著性差异。结果:45%的参与者报告说,在大流行期间,他们与伴侣的关系日益密切;其他人则报告了紧张的关系或分手。距离、面对面会议的困难、沟通的减少是参与者中报告最多的压力源。亲密组的双元应对能力明显优于紧张组和分手组(t = - 1.89,P< 0.05)。夫妻关系越亲密,伴侣间的压力沟通越好(t = - 2.38,P< 0.01)。在冲突解决方面,三组学生在妥协(r= 0.459,P< 0.01)、回避(r= 0.224,P< 0.01)、互动反应(r= - 0.446,P< 0.01)、支配(r= - 0.223,P< 0.01)和服从(r= - 0.491,P< 0.01)方面存在显著差异。分离时各组间无差异(r = - 0.07;NS)。结论:在COVID-19期间发现自己处于紧张关系或分手的个人将关系的负面结果归因于关系的内部因素。具有积极关系结果的个体参与积极的二元应对;他们采用的冲突解决策略是积极的。讨论了研究的局限性、心理健康意义和进一步研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信