{"title":"Passenger-Centric Integrated Airline Schedule and Aircraft Recovery","authors":"Luis Cadarso, Vikrant Vaze","doi":"10.1287/trsc.2022.1174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Airlines are known to compete for passengers, and airline profitability heavily depends on the ability to estimate passenger demand, which in turn depends on flight schedules, fares, and the number of seats available at each fare, across all airlines. Interestingly, such competitive interactions and passenger substitution effects may not be limited to the planning stages. Existing regulations in some countries and regions impose monetary compensations to passengers in case of disruptions, altering the way they perceive the utility of other travel alternatives after the disruption starts. These passenger rights regulations may act as catalysts of passengers’ response to recovered schedules. Ignoring such passenger response behavior under operational disruptions may lead airlines to develop subpar recovery schedules. We develop a passenger response model and embed it into a novel integrated optimization approach that recovers airline schedules, aircraft, and passenger itineraries while endogenizing the impacts of airlines' decisions on passenger compensation and passenger response. We also develop an original solution approach, involving exact linearization of the nonlinear passenger cost terms, combined with delayed constraint generation for ensuring aircraft maintenance feasibility and an acceleration technique that penalizes deviations from planned schedules. Computational results on real-world problem instances from two major European airlines are reported, for scenarios involving disruptions, such as delayed flights, airport closures, and unexpected grounding of aircraft. Our approach is found to be tractable and scalable, producing solutions that are superior to airline’s actual decisions and highly robust in the face of passenger response uncertainty. Of particular relevance to the practitioners, our simulation results highlight that accounting for passengers’ disruption response behaviors, even in a highly approximate manner, yields significant benefits to the airline compared with not accounting for them at all, which is the current state-of-the-art. Funding: This work was supported by the Agencia Estatal de Investigación [Grant PID2020-112967GB-C33], the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Spain [Grant TRA2016-76914-C3-3-P], and the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Spain [Grant CAS19/00036].","PeriodicalId":51202,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Science","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2022.1174","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Airlines are known to compete for passengers, and airline profitability heavily depends on the ability to estimate passenger demand, which in turn depends on flight schedules, fares, and the number of seats available at each fare, across all airlines. Interestingly, such competitive interactions and passenger substitution effects may not be limited to the planning stages. Existing regulations in some countries and regions impose monetary compensations to passengers in case of disruptions, altering the way they perceive the utility of other travel alternatives after the disruption starts. These passenger rights regulations may act as catalysts of passengers’ response to recovered schedules. Ignoring such passenger response behavior under operational disruptions may lead airlines to develop subpar recovery schedules. We develop a passenger response model and embed it into a novel integrated optimization approach that recovers airline schedules, aircraft, and passenger itineraries while endogenizing the impacts of airlines' decisions on passenger compensation and passenger response. We also develop an original solution approach, involving exact linearization of the nonlinear passenger cost terms, combined with delayed constraint generation for ensuring aircraft maintenance feasibility and an acceleration technique that penalizes deviations from planned schedules. Computational results on real-world problem instances from two major European airlines are reported, for scenarios involving disruptions, such as delayed flights, airport closures, and unexpected grounding of aircraft. Our approach is found to be tractable and scalable, producing solutions that are superior to airline’s actual decisions and highly robust in the face of passenger response uncertainty. Of particular relevance to the practitioners, our simulation results highlight that accounting for passengers’ disruption response behaviors, even in a highly approximate manner, yields significant benefits to the airline compared with not accounting for them at all, which is the current state-of-the-art. Funding: This work was supported by the Agencia Estatal de Investigación [Grant PID2020-112967GB-C33], the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Spain [Grant TRA2016-76914-C3-3-P], and the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Spain [Grant CAS19/00036].
众所周知,航空公司会争夺乘客,而航空公司的盈利能力在很大程度上取决于估计乘客需求的能力,而乘客需求又取决于所有航空公司的航班时刻表、票价和每种票价的可用座位数量。有趣的是,这种竞争互动和乘客替代效应可能并不局限于规划阶段。一些国家和地区的现行法规规定,在交通中断的情况下向乘客提供金钱补偿,这改变了他们在交通中断开始后对其他出行选择效用的看法。这些乘客权利规定可以作为催化剂,促进乘客对恢复的时间表作出反应。在运营中断的情况下,忽视乘客的这种反应行为可能会导致航空公司制定出低于标准的恢复计划。我们开发了一个乘客响应模型,并将其嵌入到一个新的集成优化方法中,该方法可以恢复航空公司的航班时刻表、飞机和乘客行程,同时内化航空公司决策对乘客补偿和乘客响应的影响。我们还开发了一种原始的解决方法,包括非线性乘客成本项的精确线性化,结合延迟约束生成以确保飞机维护的可行性,以及惩罚偏离计划时间表的加速技术。本文报告了来自欧洲两家主要航空公司的实际问题实例的计算结果,这些实例涉及航班延误、机场关闭和飞机意外停飞等中断情况。我们的方法易于处理且可扩展,产生的解决方案优于航空公司的实际决策,并且在面对乘客反应的不确定性时非常稳健。与从业人员特别相关的是,我们的模拟结果强调,考虑乘客的中断响应行为,即使是以高度近似的方式,也会给航空公司带来显著的好处,而不是考虑他们,这是目前最先进的。本工作得到了西班牙Estatal de Investigación [Grant PID2020-112967GB-C33]、西班牙Ministerio de Competitividad [Grant TRA2016-76914-C3-3-P]和西班牙Ciencia de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades [Grant CAS19/00036]的支持。
期刊介绍:
Transportation Science, published quarterly by INFORMS, is the flagship journal of the Transportation Science and Logistics Society of INFORMS. As the foremost scientific journal in the cross-disciplinary operational research field of transportation analysis, Transportation Science publishes high-quality original contributions and surveys on phenomena associated with all modes of transportation, present and prospective, including mainly all levels of planning, design, economic, operational, and social aspects. Transportation Science focuses primarily on fundamental theories, coupled with observational and experimental studies of transportation and logistics phenomena and processes, mathematical models, advanced methodologies and novel applications in transportation and logistics systems analysis, planning and design. The journal covers a broad range of topics that include vehicular and human traffic flow theories, models and their application to traffic operations and management, strategic, tactical, and operational planning of transportation and logistics systems; performance analysis methods and system design and optimization; theories and analysis methods for network and spatial activity interaction, equilibrium and dynamics; economics of transportation system supply and evaluation; methodologies for analysis of transportation user behavior and the demand for transportation and logistics services.
Transportation Science is international in scope, with editors from nations around the globe. The editorial board reflects the diverse interdisciplinary interests of the transportation science and logistics community, with members that hold primary affiliations in engineering (civil, industrial, and aeronautical), physics, economics, applied mathematics, and business.