Discourse network on the revision of Indonesian information and electronic transaction law

Antonius O. Lapu Hamanduna, Putut Widjanarko
{"title":"Discourse network on the revision of Indonesian information and electronic transaction law","authors":"Antonius O. Lapu Hamanduna, Putut Widjanarko","doi":"10.25139/jsk.v7i2.5496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Freedom of speech is one of the pillars of democracy that is being problematised as new media technologies are increasingly used in people's lives. In Indonesia, this can be seen in the debate over the UU ITE, passed in 2008, one aspect of which regulates the dissemination of information, fake news, and the like in the digital public sphere. For its critics, several articles in the UU ITE threaten freedom of expression and are considered a factor in the democracy regression in Indonesia. Using the DNA method, this research investigates the discourse and actors involved in the debate and how the discourse network is shaped. There are two periods covered, namely October 2016 to December 2016 and February 2021 to June 2021, when the government issued an official explanation or further regulation of the ITE Law. From three prominent online media (Kompas.com, detik.com, and Tirto.id), 359 articles were obtained and then coded based on actors and discourses. Therefore, this research shows the discourse coalition on the issue of freedom of speech. This research shows that the second period of debate involved more actors and discourses and changed the discourse network. There are realignments of network coalition by the state apparatus to be more supportive towards the more democratic discourse, although it is not necessarily materialised in the policymaking decision.","PeriodicalId":55792,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Studi Komunikasi","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Studi Komunikasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v7i2.5496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Freedom of speech is one of the pillars of democracy that is being problematised as new media technologies are increasingly used in people's lives. In Indonesia, this can be seen in the debate over the UU ITE, passed in 2008, one aspect of which regulates the dissemination of information, fake news, and the like in the digital public sphere. For its critics, several articles in the UU ITE threaten freedom of expression and are considered a factor in the democracy regression in Indonesia. Using the DNA method, this research investigates the discourse and actors involved in the debate and how the discourse network is shaped. There are two periods covered, namely October 2016 to December 2016 and February 2021 to June 2021, when the government issued an official explanation or further regulation of the ITE Law. From three prominent online media (Kompas.com, detik.com, and Tirto.id), 359 articles were obtained and then coded based on actors and discourses. Therefore, this research shows the discourse coalition on the issue of freedom of speech. This research shows that the second period of debate involved more actors and discourses and changed the discourse network. There are realignments of network coalition by the state apparatus to be more supportive towards the more democratic discourse, although it is not necessarily materialised in the policymaking decision.
论印尼信息与电子交易法的修订
言论自由是民主的支柱之一,但随着新媒体技术越来越多地应用于人们的生活,言论自由正面临问题。在印尼,这一点可以从2008年通过的UU ITE辩论中看出,该法案的一个方面是规范数字公共领域的信息传播、假新闻等。对于其批评者来说,UU ITE的几篇文章威胁到言论自由,并被认为是印尼民主倒退的一个因素。本研究运用DNA方法,探讨了辩论中的话语和行动者,以及话语网络是如何形成的。有两个时期,即2016年10月至2016年12月和2021年2月至2021年6月,政府发布了官方解释或进一步规定了it法。从三个著名的网络媒体(Kompas.com, detik.com和Tirto.id)中获得359篇文章,然后根据演员和话语进行编码。因此,本研究显示了在言论自由问题上的话语联盟。本研究表明,第二次辩论涉及更多的行动者和话语,改变了话语网络。国家机器对网络联盟进行了重新调整,以更加支持更民主的话语,尽管它不一定在决策中具体化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信