Assessing the effectiveness of a school educational video on cancer and radiotherapy

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Masanari Minamitani, Atsuto Katano, Keiichi Nakagawa
{"title":"Assessing the effectiveness of a school educational video on cancer and radiotherapy","authors":"Masanari Minamitani, Atsuto Katano, Keiichi Nakagawa","doi":"10.1177/00178969231200166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Japan has recently begun introducing educational programmes on cancer as part of health and physical education (HPE) classes in schools. In support of this work, the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology has developed an educational video to enhance children’s understanding of cancer and radiotherapy. Objectives: This study examined the perceived effectiveness of this video among teachers and clarified whether their specialisation played a role in their responses. Methods: An online survey was administered to junior and senior high school teachers without a history of cancer. Respondents’ demographic characteristics, healthy lifestyle habits, anxiety about cancer treatment and knowledge about cancer and radiotherapy were surveyed pre- and post-video. We compared the data from science teachers, HPE teachers and teachers of other specialties. Subsequently, we performed a multiple logistic regression analysis to estimate significant factors that predicted post-watch correct-answer rates. Results: Science teachers were less anxious about radiotherapy and surgery than the other-specialty teachers. They were also the most knowledgeable about cancer and radiotherapy. Post-viewing correct-answer rates improved, except for questions about the work of medical physicists and damage to normal cells. The multiple regression analysis identified age (β = .07), sex (β = .08), anxiety about radiotherapy (β = −.09) and pre-video correct-answer rates (β = .46) as significant factors predicting post-watch correct-answer rates. Conclusion: The video was beneficial in enhancing teachers’ understanding of cancer and radiotherapy. Compared with HPE and other-specialty teachers, science teachers were superior in terms of cancer and radiotherapy comprehension. There may be value in exploring possibilities for cross-disciplinary instruction involving not only HPE but also science teachers in cancer education, especially radiotherapy education.","PeriodicalId":47346,"journal":{"name":"Health Education Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00178969231200166","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Japan has recently begun introducing educational programmes on cancer as part of health and physical education (HPE) classes in schools. In support of this work, the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology has developed an educational video to enhance children’s understanding of cancer and radiotherapy. Objectives: This study examined the perceived effectiveness of this video among teachers and clarified whether their specialisation played a role in their responses. Methods: An online survey was administered to junior and senior high school teachers without a history of cancer. Respondents’ demographic characteristics, healthy lifestyle habits, anxiety about cancer treatment and knowledge about cancer and radiotherapy were surveyed pre- and post-video. We compared the data from science teachers, HPE teachers and teachers of other specialties. Subsequently, we performed a multiple logistic regression analysis to estimate significant factors that predicted post-watch correct-answer rates. Results: Science teachers were less anxious about radiotherapy and surgery than the other-specialty teachers. They were also the most knowledgeable about cancer and radiotherapy. Post-viewing correct-answer rates improved, except for questions about the work of medical physicists and damage to normal cells. The multiple regression analysis identified age (β = .07), sex (β = .08), anxiety about radiotherapy (β = −.09) and pre-video correct-answer rates (β = .46) as significant factors predicting post-watch correct-answer rates. Conclusion: The video was beneficial in enhancing teachers’ understanding of cancer and radiotherapy. Compared with HPE and other-specialty teachers, science teachers were superior in terms of cancer and radiotherapy comprehension. There may be value in exploring possibilities for cross-disciplinary instruction involving not only HPE but also science teachers in cancer education, especially radiotherapy education.
评估一段有关癌症及放射治疗的学校教育录影带的效果
背景:日本最近开始引入关于癌症的教育方案,作为学校健康和体育课程的一部分。为了支持这项工作,日本放射肿瘤学协会制作了一个教育视频,以提高儿童对癌症和放射治疗的认识。目的:本研究考察了教师对该视频的感知有效性,并澄清了他们的专业是否在他们的反应中发挥了作用。方法:对无癌症病史的初中和高中教师进行在线调查。调查调查对象的人口统计学特征、健康生活习惯、对癌症治疗的焦虑以及对癌症和放疗的知识。我们比较了理科教师、HPE教师和其他专业教师的数据。随后,我们进行了多元逻辑回归分析,以估计预测观看后正确答案率的重要因素。结果:理科教师对放疗和手术的焦虑程度低于其他专业教师。他们也是最了解癌症和放射治疗的人。除了关于医学物理学家的工作和对正常细胞的损害的问题外,观看后的正确率有所提高。多元回归分析发现,年龄(β = 0.07)、性别(β = 0.08)、放疗焦虑(β = - 0.09)和视频前正确率(β = 0.46)是预测观看后正确率的显著因素。结论:该视频有助于提高教师对肿瘤及放疗的认识。理科教师对肿瘤和放疗的理解程度优于其他专业教师。探索跨学科教学的可能性,不仅包括HPE,而且包括科学教师在癌症教育,特别是放射治疗教育方面的可能性,可能是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Health Education Journal is a leading peer reviewed journal established in 1943. It carries original papers on health promotion and education research, policy development and good practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信