Transatlantic Women at Work: Service in the Long 19th Century

Laura-Isabella Heitz, Khristeena Lute, Julia Nitz, Sandra Harbert Petrulionis, Esther Wetzel
{"title":"Transatlantic Women at Work: Service in the Long 19th Century","authors":"Laura-Isabella Heitz, Khristeena Lute, Julia Nitz, Sandra Harbert Petrulionis, Esther Wetzel","doi":"10.18422/74-1401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This special issue focuses on “Transatlantic Women at Work” in the 19th century, with attention paid specifically to the labor women performed that was deemed by family, community, government, and often the women themselves as “service.” Our introduction briefly describes the six articles and responses included in this issue, and their origins in an online forum in 2021 and 2022, three poems, and one fictional work. The overview of contributions is followed by an attempt at theorizing the understanding and conception of the idea of “service” from a diachronic perspective. This exploration of varying notions and the accompanying politics of “service” is organized in sections as follows: “The Evolving Concept of ‘Service’ in the Long 19th Century,” “Theorizing: What Is this Thing Called Service,” “The Tradition of ‘Service’ as a White, Middle-Class Notion,” “Women’s Service and Reform,” “Municipal Housekeeping as Service to the Community,” and “Women of Color and ‘Service to Their Race’.” Our examination of 19th-century conduct books and reform texts by and for women illuminates how evolving notions of service as benevolence was primarily connected to a well-to-do class of White women and conceptualized against a notion of servitude as hard (enumerated) labor associated with poor women and Women of Color. We show how since the beginning of the century Black activists fought against such racial essentialism. However, White service notions lastingly influenced both 19th-century (segregated) ideas of women’s social roles and 20th/21st century women’s historiography that continued to center White concepts of True Womanhood. We conclude by acknowledging that in our own 21st century, women (especially Women of Color) too often continue in the vicious cycle of being relegated to lower paid and lower status service work, professions which remain lower paid because they are held by women. As we point out, the recent Covid pandemic shed renewed light on this transatlantic reality.","PeriodicalId":221210,"journal":{"name":"New American Studies Journal","volume":"205 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New American Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18422/74-1401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This special issue focuses on “Transatlantic Women at Work” in the 19th century, with attention paid specifically to the labor women performed that was deemed by family, community, government, and often the women themselves as “service.” Our introduction briefly describes the six articles and responses included in this issue, and their origins in an online forum in 2021 and 2022, three poems, and one fictional work. The overview of contributions is followed by an attempt at theorizing the understanding and conception of the idea of “service” from a diachronic perspective. This exploration of varying notions and the accompanying politics of “service” is organized in sections as follows: “The Evolving Concept of ‘Service’ in the Long 19th Century,” “Theorizing: What Is this Thing Called Service,” “The Tradition of ‘Service’ as a White, Middle-Class Notion,” “Women’s Service and Reform,” “Municipal Housekeeping as Service to the Community,” and “Women of Color and ‘Service to Their Race’.” Our examination of 19th-century conduct books and reform texts by and for women illuminates how evolving notions of service as benevolence was primarily connected to a well-to-do class of White women and conceptualized against a notion of servitude as hard (enumerated) labor associated with poor women and Women of Color. We show how since the beginning of the century Black activists fought against such racial essentialism. However, White service notions lastingly influenced both 19th-century (segregated) ideas of women’s social roles and 20th/21st century women’s historiography that continued to center White concepts of True Womanhood. We conclude by acknowledging that in our own 21st century, women (especially Women of Color) too often continue in the vicious cycle of being relegated to lower paid and lower status service work, professions which remain lower paid because they are held by women. As we point out, the recent Covid pandemic shed renewed light on this transatlantic reality.
《跨大西洋工作中的女性:漫长的19世纪的服务业
这期特刊聚焦于19世纪的“跨大西洋工作中的女性”,特别关注女性所从事的被家庭、社区、政府甚至通常是女性自己视为“服务”的劳动。我们的引言简要介绍了本期收录的六篇文章和回应,以及它们在2021年和2022年的一个在线论坛上的起源,三首诗和一部小说作品。在概述贡献之后,尝试从历时的角度对“服务”概念的理解和概念进行理论化。对“服务”的各种概念和伴随的政治的探索分为以下几个部分:“漫长的19世纪“服务”概念的演变”、“理论化:什么叫服务”、“作为白人中产阶级概念的“服务”传统”、“妇女服务和改革”、“市政家政服务于社区”和“有色人种妇女和“为他们的种族服务”。我们对19世纪由女性撰写和为女性撰写的行为书籍和改革文本的研究表明,作为仁慈的服务观念的演变主要是与富裕阶层的白人女性联系在一起的,并且与贫穷女性和有色人种女性所涉及的作为艰苦劳动的奴役观念形成了概念。我们展示了自本世纪初以来,黑人活动家是如何与这种种族本质主义作斗争的。然而,白人的服务观念持久地影响了19世纪(隔离)女性社会角色的观念和20 /21世纪的女性史学,后者继续以白人的“真正的女性”概念为中心。最后,我们承认,在我们自己的21世纪,女性(尤其是有色人种女性)经常继续陷入恶性循环,被降级到低收入和地位较低的服务工作中,这些职业的工资仍然较低,因为它们是由女性担任的。正如我们所指出的,最近的Covid大流行重新揭示了这一跨大西洋现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信