Guided to Guider: the “∼ed” and “∼er” roles in professional development materials for guided Reading

IF 1.6 2区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Maria Nicholas, David Kellogg
{"title":"Guided to Guider: the “∼ed” and “∼er” roles in professional development materials for guided Reading","authors":"Maria Nicholas, David Kellogg","doi":"10.1080/10350330.2023.2258362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis paper takes a social semiotic, Bernsteinian, view of the language used to describe the Guided Reading teaching strategy in Professional Development session materials for in-service teachers in Australia. We use categories from Michael Halliday’s systemic-functional grammar and Ruqaiya Hasan’s stylistics to demonstrate a radical discontinuity between content and form. While the content of the professional development materials makes the case for greater child dynamism in reading, the grammatical roles assigned to the children by the language forms are generally less dynamic than those assigned to the teacher. We propose two changes. First, classroom language should aim at increasing child “∼er” roles. Secondly, the language of professional development materials ought to reflect, and if possible, appropriate and speak through that classroom language.KEYWORDS: systemic linguisticsteacher developmenttextbooksprimary school educationteacher education Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":21775,"journal":{"name":"Social Semiotics","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Semiotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2023.2258362","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis paper takes a social semiotic, Bernsteinian, view of the language used to describe the Guided Reading teaching strategy in Professional Development session materials for in-service teachers in Australia. We use categories from Michael Halliday’s systemic-functional grammar and Ruqaiya Hasan’s stylistics to demonstrate a radical discontinuity between content and form. While the content of the professional development materials makes the case for greater child dynamism in reading, the grammatical roles assigned to the children by the language forms are generally less dynamic than those assigned to the teacher. We propose two changes. First, classroom language should aim at increasing child “∼er” roles. Secondly, the language of professional development materials ought to reflect, and if possible, appropriate and speak through that classroom language.KEYWORDS: systemic linguisticsteacher developmenttextbooksprimary school educationteacher education Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
导读到导读:导读专业发展材料中的“~ ed”和“~ er”角色
摘要本文从社会符号学和伯恩斯坦的角度,对澳大利亚在职教师专业发展课程教材中引导性阅读教学策略的语言描述进行了研究。我们使用Michael Halliday的系统功能语法和Ruqaiya Hasan的文体学中的范畴来证明内容和形式之间的根本不连续性。虽然专业发展材料的内容使儿童在阅读中具有更大的活力,但语言形式分配给儿童的语法角色通常不如分配给教师的动态。我们提出两个改变。首先,课堂语言应该旨在增加儿童的“~ er”角色。其次,专业发展材料的语言应该反映,如果可能的话,适当的,通过课堂语言说话。关键词:系统语言学教师发展教科书小学教育教师教育披露声明作者未发现潜在的利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Semiotics
Social Semiotics Multiple-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信