Building synthetic worlds: lessons from the excessive infatuation and oversold disillusionment with the metaverse

IF 3.4 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Michael G. Jacobides, Francois Candelon, Lisa Krayer, Katie Round, Winson Chen
{"title":"Building synthetic worlds: lessons from the excessive infatuation and oversold disillusionment with the metaverse","authors":"Michael G. Jacobides, Francois Candelon, Lisa Krayer, Katie Round, Winson Chen","doi":"10.1080/13662716.2023.2279051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The metaverse comprises a range of technologies offering shared digital experiences based on immersive virtual worlds or decentralised economies. Brands, Big Tech, and investors made huge investments in the metaverse, but users did not share their excitement and the bubble duly burst. We explore this story by drawing on a wide range of data sources and first-hand knowledge. We consider the metaverse as a set of overlapping, partly competing ecosystems and expand the lens of industry architecture to Ecosystem Architecture to examine the rules, roles, and responsibilities involved. We find that incumbent firms rushed to embrace the metaverse in the hope of pre-empting disruption and safeguarding their competitive position, leading to over-investment. Greed among ecosystem orchestrators impeded contributors from creating value, while persistent technological shortcomings impaired the user experience. Our study throws new light on the dynamics of innovation and technology hypes and the challenges involved in cultivating and coordinating ecosystems.","PeriodicalId":13585,"journal":{"name":"Industry and Innovation","volume":"161 6‐7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industry and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2023.2279051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The metaverse comprises a range of technologies offering shared digital experiences based on immersive virtual worlds or decentralised economies. Brands, Big Tech, and investors made huge investments in the metaverse, but users did not share their excitement and the bubble duly burst. We explore this story by drawing on a wide range of data sources and first-hand knowledge. We consider the metaverse as a set of overlapping, partly competing ecosystems and expand the lens of industry architecture to Ecosystem Architecture to examine the rules, roles, and responsibilities involved. We find that incumbent firms rushed to embrace the metaverse in the hope of pre-empting disruption and safeguarding their competitive position, leading to over-investment. Greed among ecosystem orchestrators impeded contributors from creating value, while persistent technological shortcomings impaired the user experience. Our study throws new light on the dynamics of innovation and technology hypes and the challenges involved in cultivating and coordinating ecosystems.
构建合成世界:对虚拟世界的过度迷恋和过度幻灭的教训
虚拟世界包括一系列技术,提供基于沉浸式虚拟世界或分散经济的共享数字体验。品牌、大型科技公司和投资者在虚拟世界投入了巨额资金,但用户并没有分享他们的兴奋,泡沫也随之破裂。我们通过广泛的数据来源和第一手知识来探索这个故事。我们将虚拟世界视为一组重叠的、部分竞争的生态系统,并将行业架构的视角扩展到生态系统架构,以检查所涉及的规则、角色和责任。我们发现,现有企业急于拥抱虚拟世界,希望先发制人,防止颠覆,维护自己的竞争地位,从而导致过度投资。生态系统协调者的贪婪阻碍了贡献者创造价值,而持续的技术缺陷损害了用户体验。我们的研究为创新和技术炒作的动态以及培育和协调生态系统所涉及的挑战提供了新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Industry and Innovation is an international refereed journal presenting high-quality original scholarship of the dynamics of industries and innovation. Interdisciplinary in nature, Industry and Innovation is informed by, and contributes in turn to, advancing the theoretical frontier within economics, organization theory, and economic geography. Theoretical issues encompass: •What are the institutional underpinnings for different organizational forms? •How are different industrial structures and institutions related to innovation patterns and economic performance?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信