A comparative study of gender representation in junior high school EFL textbooks of Hong Kong and Japan

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Dexter Yim, Rolian Lee
{"title":"A comparative study of gender representation in junior high school EFL textbooks of Hong Kong and Japan","authors":"Dexter Yim, Rolian Lee","doi":"10.54475/jlt.2023.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to investigate the representation of gender and the presence of male dominance in spoken discourse in two selected English Language textbooks for junior high school year one students: Longman English EDGE (2nd Edition) 1A and 1B in Hong Kong, and New Horizon: English Course Book 1 in Japan, respectively. This research employs both qualitative and quantitative analyses to examine the content of dialogues in each unit. Key areas of analysis include the number of domestic and occupational roles assigned to male, female, and gender-neutral characters, the range of activities undertaken by these characters, the character initiating conversations, the occurrence of males, females and gender-neutral characters in dialogues, and the number of spoken words and turns by them. The findings indicated an improvement in gender equality in both textbooks in various aspects, compared with other earlier textbooks which were examined by other researchers (Lee & Collins, 2008, 2010; Lee, 2018). In terms of role allocation and activities, a relatively balanced representation of male and female characters was observed. Female characters demonstrated a higher frequency of initiating conversations and taking turns. The average number of words spoken per turn by male and female characters was similar in the LE1A and LE1B textbooks, but male characters still spoke more per turn in NH1 textbook despite female characters taking more turns. Moreover, LE1A and LE1B employed gender-neutral names to mitigate gender stereotypes but gender-neutral names were not utilized in the Japanese textbook, despite the author’s effort to achieve gender equality. Considering these findings, this study reveals that male characters were underrepresented in the textbooks in Hong Kong and suggests that it is crucial to enhance gender awareness among English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers, provide explicit gender-sensitive instruction, and establish specific guidelines by educational authorities to assist textbook authors in creating gender-inclusive educational materials.","PeriodicalId":53931,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language Teaching and Learning","volume":"29 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54475/jlt.2023.027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the representation of gender and the presence of male dominance in spoken discourse in two selected English Language textbooks for junior high school year one students: Longman English EDGE (2nd Edition) 1A and 1B in Hong Kong, and New Horizon: English Course Book 1 in Japan, respectively. This research employs both qualitative and quantitative analyses to examine the content of dialogues in each unit. Key areas of analysis include the number of domestic and occupational roles assigned to male, female, and gender-neutral characters, the range of activities undertaken by these characters, the character initiating conversations, the occurrence of males, females and gender-neutral characters in dialogues, and the number of spoken words and turns by them. The findings indicated an improvement in gender equality in both textbooks in various aspects, compared with other earlier textbooks which were examined by other researchers (Lee & Collins, 2008, 2010; Lee, 2018). In terms of role allocation and activities, a relatively balanced representation of male and female characters was observed. Female characters demonstrated a higher frequency of initiating conversations and taking turns. The average number of words spoken per turn by male and female characters was similar in the LE1A and LE1B textbooks, but male characters still spoke more per turn in NH1 textbook despite female characters taking more turns. Moreover, LE1A and LE1B employed gender-neutral names to mitigate gender stereotypes but gender-neutral names were not utilized in the Japanese textbook, despite the author’s effort to achieve gender equality. Considering these findings, this study reveals that male characters were underrepresented in the textbooks in Hong Kong and suggests that it is crucial to enhance gender awareness among English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers, provide explicit gender-sensitive instruction, and establish specific guidelines by educational authorities to assist textbook authors in creating gender-inclusive educational materials.
香港与日本初中英语教材性别代表性比较研究
本研究旨在探讨香港朗文英语EDGE(第二版)1A和1B和日本新视野英语教材1在初中一年级学生口语话语中的性别表征和男性主导地位的存在。本研究采用定性和定量分析相结合的方法来考察每个单元的对话内容。分析的关键领域包括分配给男性、女性和性别中立角色的家庭和职业角色的数量,这些角色所承担的活动范围,角色发起对话,男性、女性和性别中立角色在对话中的出现,以及他们说的话和转身的数量。研究结果表明,与其他研究人员研究的其他早期教科书相比,这两种教科书在各个方面都改善了性别平等(Lee &Collins, 2008, 2010;李,2018)。在角色分配和活动方面,男女角色的表现相对平衡。女性角色表现出更高的频率发起对话和轮流。在LE1A和LE1B两种教材中,男性角色和女性角色的平均回合发言数相似,但在NH1教材中,男性角色的回合发言数更多,而女性角色的回合数更多。此外,LE1A和LE1B使用性别中性的名字来减轻性别刻板印象,但尽管作者努力实现性别平等,但日本教科书并未使用性别中性的名字。考虑到这些发现,本研究揭示了香港教科书中男性角色的代表性不足,并建议教育当局必须提高英语教师的性别意识,提供明确的性别敏感教学,并制定具体的指导方针,以协助教科书作者创建性别包容性的教材。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Language Teaching and Learning
Journal of Language Teaching and Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信