Ultrasound diagnostics of left ventricular hypertrophy: once more about the indexation of myocardial mass

S. N. Bogomolov, V. N. Solntsev, A. N. Kulikov, A. N. Kuchmin
{"title":"Ultrasound diagnostics of left ventricular hypertrophy: once more about the indexation of myocardial mass","authors":"S. N. Bogomolov, V. N. Solntsev, A. N. Kulikov, A. N. Kuchmin","doi":"10.33667/2078-5631-2023-22-44-49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We provided historical aspects and some features of different ultrasound diagnostic methods of left ventricular hypertrophy, their advantages and disadvantages. Using some methods of statistical analysis, we tried to assess the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and consistency of the two most commonly used methods of left ventricular mass indexations (to the body surface area and to the height 2.7) among patients with different body mass indexes. According to our results, among patients with body mass index less than 25.0 kg/m2, both left ventricular myocardial mass indexations have good consistency with each other and can be effectively used in the diagnostic of left ventricular hypertrophy. Fairly good consistency between the studied criteria among patients with a body mass index of 25.0–29.9 also, theoretically, allows to use both methods of indexation for the diagnosing of this pathology. According to the poor consistency of the studied criteria, in case of body mass index more than 30.0 kg/m2, left ventricular myocardial mass indexation to height 2,7 should be used only.","PeriodicalId":499576,"journal":{"name":"Medicinskij alfavit","volume":"4 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicinskij alfavit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2023-22-44-49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We provided historical aspects and some features of different ultrasound diagnostic methods of left ventricular hypertrophy, their advantages and disadvantages. Using some methods of statistical analysis, we tried to assess the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and consistency of the two most commonly used methods of left ventricular mass indexations (to the body surface area and to the height 2.7) among patients with different body mass indexes. According to our results, among patients with body mass index less than 25.0 kg/m2, both left ventricular myocardial mass indexations have good consistency with each other and can be effectively used in the diagnostic of left ventricular hypertrophy. Fairly good consistency between the studied criteria among patients with a body mass index of 25.0–29.9 also, theoretically, allows to use both methods of indexation for the diagnosing of this pathology. According to the poor consistency of the studied criteria, in case of body mass index more than 30.0 kg/m2, left ventricular myocardial mass indexation to height 2,7 should be used only.
左室肥厚的超声诊断:再谈心肌质量指标
本文介绍了左室肥厚超声诊断方法的历史、特点及优缺点。采用统计分析的方法,对两种最常用的左室质量指数(体表面积和身高2.7)在不同体重指数患者中的敏感性、特异性、准确性和一致性进行评价。根据我们的研究结果,在体重指数小于25.0 kg/m2的患者中,两种左室心肌质量指标具有良好的一致性,可以有效地用于左室肥厚的诊断。在体质指数为25.0-29.9的患者中,所研究的标准之间具有相当好的一致性,理论上也允许使用这两种指数化方法来诊断这种病理。由于所研究标准的一致性较差,当体重指数大于30.0 kg/m2时,应仅使用左室心肌质量指数至身高2,7。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信