Ketidaksesuaian Penyampaian Harga Tanah: Tanggung Jawab Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah

Salwah Nur Afifah, Abrar Saleng, Sri Susyanti Nur
{"title":"Ketidaksesuaian Penyampaian Harga Tanah: Tanggung Jawab Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah","authors":"Salwah Nur Afifah, Abrar Saleng, Sri Susyanti Nur","doi":"10.31328/wy.v6i3.4589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze the PPAT's responsibility for the land sale and purchase deed he made in the event that the parties do not convey the actual land price and analyze the validity and consequences that will arise if the land sale and purchase deed does not include the actual land price. This research is normative research, where in this research the subject matter of the study is in the form of the application of normative law in action to any particular legal event that occurs in society. The results of the study show that if the PPAT knows that the price entered by the parties is included in the sale and purchase agreement, the PPAT must refuse to make the sale and purchase deed. In addition, it is mandatory for PPAT as an extension of the government to play an active role in providing counseling or guidance to prospective buyers and sellers not to reduce the actual price of the land sale and purchase price between them. Then regarding the validity and consequences that will arise in the future if the land sale and purchase deed does not include the actual price of the land and without the PPAT knowing as the maker, it can result in the land sale and purchase deed (authentic deed) degrading its evidentiary power to a private deed because it has been made with ways that deviate or are not in accordance with procedures both materially and formally. And it is possible that in the future it will be discovered that the price stated in the land sale and purchase deed is incorrect, so there is a possibility that the parties (seller and buyer) may be entangled in Article 266 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code.","PeriodicalId":106813,"journal":{"name":"Widya Yuridika","volume":"98 s2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Widya Yuridika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v6i3.4589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the PPAT's responsibility for the land sale and purchase deed he made in the event that the parties do not convey the actual land price and analyze the validity and consequences that will arise if the land sale and purchase deed does not include the actual land price. This research is normative research, where in this research the subject matter of the study is in the form of the application of normative law in action to any particular legal event that occurs in society. The results of the study show that if the PPAT knows that the price entered by the parties is included in the sale and purchase agreement, the PPAT must refuse to make the sale and purchase deed. In addition, it is mandatory for PPAT as an extension of the government to play an active role in providing counseling or guidance to prospective buyers and sellers not to reduce the actual price of the land sale and purchase price between them. Then regarding the validity and consequences that will arise in the future if the land sale and purchase deed does not include the actual price of the land and without the PPAT knowing as the maker, it can result in the land sale and purchase deed (authentic deed) degrading its evidentiary power to a private deed because it has been made with ways that deviate or are not in accordance with procedures both materially and formally. And it is possible that in the future it will be discovered that the price stated in the land sale and purchase deed is incorrect, so there is a possibility that the parties (seller and buyer) may be entangled in Article 266 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code.
提交的地价不一致:土地契约官员的责任
本研究旨在分析PPAT在双方未传达实际土地价格的情况下,对其签订的土地买卖契约的责任,并分析如果土地买卖契约不包括实际土地价格,将会产生的有效性和后果。这种研究是规范性研究,在这种研究中,研究的主题是规范性法律在社会中发生的任何特定法律事件中的应用。研究结果表明,如果PPAT知道双方输入的价格包含在买卖协议中,则PPAT必须拒绝订立买卖契约。此外,作为政府的延伸,PPAT必须发挥积极的作用,为潜在的买家和卖家提供咨询或指导,不要降低他们之间的土地买卖价格的实际价格。那么,如果土地买卖契约不包括土地的实际价格,并且PPAT不知道作为制造商,则可能导致土地买卖契约(真实契约)因其在物质上和形式上都偏离或不符合程序而使其举证能力降低到私人契约。而且将来有可能发现土地买卖契约上所记载的价格不正确,因此存在当事人(卖方和买方)被《刑法》第266条第(1)款纠缠的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信