Hornos de la Peña (Northern Iberia): New excavations, chronological and subsistence data of the Middle-to-Upper Palaeolithic transition

IF 0.7 4区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Alicia Sanz-Royo, Ana B. Marín-Arroyo, Olivia Rivero, Joseba Rios-Garaizar
{"title":"Hornos de la Peña (Northern Iberia): New excavations, chronological and subsistence data of the Middle-to-Upper Palaeolithic transition","authors":"Alicia Sanz-Royo, Ana B. Marín-Arroyo, Olivia Rivero, Joseba Rios-Garaizar","doi":"10.15366/archaeofauna2023.32.1.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study of the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition is one of the topics of more interest in the field of human evolution, where the differences in the subsistence strategies carried out by Neanderthals and Anatomically Modern Humans have generated numerous debates during recent years. Hornos de la Peña cave (Cantabria, Northern Iberia), excavated during 1909-1910, contains archaeological levels attributed to this transition, which have provided se-veral publications about the human groups that occupied the cave. However, the stratigraphic sequence proposed by Obermaier at the beginning of the 20th century has been questioned due, among others, to the lack of reliable dating. From 2016 to the present, new excavation works are being carried out to review the integrity of the stratigraphic sequence and its chronology and to analyze the new faunal remains. In this article, we present the first radiocarbon dates performed on the levels attributed to the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition, as well as the archaeozoo-logical and taphonomic results of the macrofauna recovered. Our results have revealed the complexity of the stratigraphic sequence, confirming that the previous stratigraphy proposed by Obermaier must be reconsidered. For that reason, although the activity of human groups inside the cave has been proved due to the presence of different anthropogenic modifications (mainly in horses, red deer and large bovids), it is not possible to construct hypotheses about their subsistence strategies. In summary, this new study has made it possible to reassess the stratigraphic sequence and provide new data on the chronology and the activities carried out by the human groups that occupied the cavity. In addition, this work highlights the importance of reviewing and dating levels from ancient excavations without reliable dating.","PeriodicalId":44490,"journal":{"name":"ARCHAEOFAUNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHAEOFAUNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15366/archaeofauna2023.32.1.008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study of the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition is one of the topics of more interest in the field of human evolution, where the differences in the subsistence strategies carried out by Neanderthals and Anatomically Modern Humans have generated numerous debates during recent years. Hornos de la Peña cave (Cantabria, Northern Iberia), excavated during 1909-1910, contains archaeological levels attributed to this transition, which have provided se-veral publications about the human groups that occupied the cave. However, the stratigraphic sequence proposed by Obermaier at the beginning of the 20th century has been questioned due, among others, to the lack of reliable dating. From 2016 to the present, new excavation works are being carried out to review the integrity of the stratigraphic sequence and its chronology and to analyze the new faunal remains. In this article, we present the first radiocarbon dates performed on the levels attributed to the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition, as well as the archaeozoo-logical and taphonomic results of the macrofauna recovered. Our results have revealed the complexity of the stratigraphic sequence, confirming that the previous stratigraphy proposed by Obermaier must be reconsidered. For that reason, although the activity of human groups inside the cave has been proved due to the presence of different anthropogenic modifications (mainly in horses, red deer and large bovids), it is not possible to construct hypotheses about their subsistence strategies. In summary, this new study has made it possible to reassess the stratigraphic sequence and provide new data on the chronology and the activities carried out by the human groups that occupied the cavity. In addition, this work highlights the importance of reviewing and dating levels from ancient excavations without reliable dating.
Hornos de la Peña(伊比利亚北部):旧石器时代中晚期过渡时期的新发掘、年代和生活资料
对旧石器时代中晚期过渡的研究是人类进化领域更感兴趣的主题之一,尼安德特人和解剖学上的现代人在生存策略上的差异近年来引起了许多争论。Hornos de la Peña洞穴(坎塔布里亚,伊比利亚北部),在1909-1910年间被挖掘出来,包含了归因于这一转变的考古水平,这提供了一些关于占领洞穴的人类群体的出版物。然而,Obermaier在20世纪初提出的地层层序由于缺乏可靠的年代测定而受到质疑。从2016年至今,新的挖掘工作正在进行,以审查地层序列及其年代学的完整性,并分析新的动物遗骸。在这篇文章中,我们介绍了在中旧石器时代到上旧石器时代过渡的水平上进行的第一次放射性碳测年,以及对恢复的大型动物的考古和地语学结果。我们的研究结果揭示了地层层序的复杂性,证实了奥伯迈尔先前提出的地层必须重新考虑。由于这个原因,尽管人类群体在洞穴内的活动已经被证明是由于不同的人为修改(主要是马、马鹿和大型牛科动物)的存在,但不可能对他们的生存策略建立假设。总之,这项新研究使重新评估地层序列成为可能,并提供了关于年代学和占据洞穴的人类群体进行的活动的新数据。此外,这项工作强调了在没有可靠测年的情况下,对古代发掘的水平进行审查和测年的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ARCHAEOFAUNA
ARCHAEOFAUNA ARCHAEOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: ARCHAEOFAUNA publica trabajos originales relacionados con cualquier aspecto del estudio de restos animales recuperados en yacimientos arqueológicos.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信