Diagnostic Accuracy of Smartphone Corneal Photography for Detection of Corneal Opacities in a Resource-Limited Setting: A Community-Based Study

Binh Cao, Puspa Giri, Raghunandan Byanju, Sangita Pradhan, Gopal Bhandari, Sadhan Bhandari, Ram Prasad Kandel, Bimal Poudyal, John A. Gonzales, Muthiah Srinivasan, Madan Upadhyay, John P. Whitcher, Kieran S. O'Brien, Thomas M. Lietman, Jeremy D. Keenan
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of Smartphone Corneal Photography for Detection of Corneal Opacities in a Resource-Limited Setting: A Community-Based Study","authors":"Binh Cao, Puspa Giri, Raghunandan Byanju, Sangita Pradhan, Gopal Bhandari, Sadhan Bhandari, Ram Prasad Kandel, Bimal Poudyal, John A. Gonzales, Muthiah Srinivasan, Madan Upadhyay, John P. Whitcher, Kieran S. O'Brien, Thomas M. Lietman, Jeremy D. Keenan","doi":"10.1097/coa.0000000000000018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of smartphone corneal photography in detecting corneal opacities in a community-based setting. Methods: A case-control, diagnostic accuracy study was nested in a cluster-randomized trial of a corneal ulcer prevention intervention in Nepal. Smartphone corneal photography was performed annually on community members self-reporting a potential risk factor for a corneal infection. Corneal photographs were graded for the presence or absence of an opacity. All cases with an opacity on smartphone photography and an equal number of controls were invited for a comprehensive eye examination with a slit lamp biomicroscope at an eye hospital. A mobile team visited participants unable to come to the hospital, conducting a limited examination with a penlight. Results: Of 1332 study participants (666 cases and 666 controls), 1097 had a penlight examination (535 cases and 562 controls) and 191 had a slit lamp examination (120 cases and 71 controls). When penlight examination was considered the reference standard, smartphone diagnosis of a corneal opacity had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 47% (95% confidence interval 43%–52%) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 95% (93%–97%). When slit lamp examination was considered the reference standard, the overall PPV and NPV were 71% (62%–78%) and 80% (70%–88%), respectively. The NPV was greater for detection of opacities >1 mm, estimated at 95% (90%–98%). Conclusions: Corneal photography performed in a resource-limited community-based setting using a smartphone coupled to an external attachment had acceptable diagnostic accuracy for detection of corneal opacities large enough to be clinically meaningful.","PeriodicalId":72708,"journal":{"name":"Cornea open","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cornea open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/coa.0000000000000018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of smartphone corneal photography in detecting corneal opacities in a community-based setting. Methods: A case-control, diagnostic accuracy study was nested in a cluster-randomized trial of a corneal ulcer prevention intervention in Nepal. Smartphone corneal photography was performed annually on community members self-reporting a potential risk factor for a corneal infection. Corneal photographs were graded for the presence or absence of an opacity. All cases with an opacity on smartphone photography and an equal number of controls were invited for a comprehensive eye examination with a slit lamp biomicroscope at an eye hospital. A mobile team visited participants unable to come to the hospital, conducting a limited examination with a penlight. Results: Of 1332 study participants (666 cases and 666 controls), 1097 had a penlight examination (535 cases and 562 controls) and 191 had a slit lamp examination (120 cases and 71 controls). When penlight examination was considered the reference standard, smartphone diagnosis of a corneal opacity had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 47% (95% confidence interval 43%–52%) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 95% (93%–97%). When slit lamp examination was considered the reference standard, the overall PPV and NPV were 71% (62%–78%) and 80% (70%–88%), respectively. The NPV was greater for detection of opacities >1 mm, estimated at 95% (90%–98%). Conclusions: Corneal photography performed in a resource-limited community-based setting using a smartphone coupled to an external attachment had acceptable diagnostic accuracy for detection of corneal opacities large enough to be clinically meaningful.
在资源有限的情况下,智能手机角膜摄影检测角膜混浊的诊断准确性:一项社区研究
目的:评价智能手机角膜摄影检测社区角膜混浊的诊断准确性。方法:一项病例对照,诊断准确性研究嵌套在尼泊尔角膜溃疡预防干预的集群随机试验中。每年对自我报告角膜感染潜在危险因素的社区成员进行智能手机角膜摄影。角膜照片被分级为存在或不透明。所有在智能手机照片上有不透明的病例和同等数量的对照组被邀请在眼科医院用裂隙灯生物显微镜进行全面的眼科检查。一个流动小组访问了无法前往医院的参与者,用笔灯进行了有限的检查。结果:在1332名研究参与者(666例和666例对照)中,1097人进行了笔灯检查(535例和562例对照),191人进行了裂隙灯检查(120例和71例对照)。当钢笔检查作为参考标准时,智能手机诊断角膜混浊的阳性预测值(PPV)为47%(95%置信区间为43%-52%),阴性预测值(NPV)为95%(93%-97%)。以裂隙灯检查为参考标准时,总PPV为71% (62% ~ 78%),NPV为80%(70% ~ 88%)。对于1 mm的混浊物,NPV更高,估计为95%(90%-98%)。结论:在资源有限的社区环境中,使用智能手机连接外部附件进行角膜摄影,对于检测足够大的角膜混浊具有可接受的诊断准确性,具有临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信