Using the Implicit Association Test to Address Healthcare Disparities in Minority Patients: Initiating the Discussion in an Orthopedic Surgery Cohort

IF 0.2 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Brittany DeClouette , Molly Hulbert , Dikran Nalbandian , Charla Fischer
{"title":"Using the Implicit Association Test to Address Healthcare Disparities in Minority Patients: Initiating the Discussion in an Orthopedic Surgery Cohort","authors":"Brittany DeClouette ,&nbsp;Molly Hulbert ,&nbsp;Dikran Nalbandian ,&nbsp;Charla Fischer","doi":"10.1016/j.oto.2023.101069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Healthcare disparities<span> have become a notable topic of research in the last decade. Within orthopedics<span>, minority patients experience these disparities via increased lengths of stay, higher 30-day hospital readmission rates, and poor patient reported outcomes. One possible cause for these disparities is implicit bias held by providers. The aims of this study were to assess the current state of implicit racial biases among orthopedic surgeons at various stages of training and to review the current literature involving effects of implicit bias on healthcare and patient outcomes. Orthopedic surgery medical student subinterns, residents, and attendings at an urban academic medical center were provided an anonymous, voluntary survey to document the results of an online Implicit Association Test (IAT) specifically focusing on race. These results were compared among the three groups and to that of the general population. Our results demonstrated that medical students and residents mirror the general population with an inherent preference for White over Black people. Attendings differed significantly from the general population with the most common result being little to no preference for either race. This small pilot study demonstrated varied IAT results, with both medical students and residents showing a preference for White over Black people, as compared to attendings who showed no preference for either race. Given the small cohort, it is difficult to generalize this data. Regardless, implicit racial biases are prevalent and can lead to poor patient interactions and worse clinical outcomes. The IAT provides a reliable assessment tool for implicit bias and can help guide interventions. Initiating this discussion is invaluable within orthopedics, but more research with larger cohorts is needed to evaluate feasibility of assessing bias and identify successful methods of reducing it.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":45242,"journal":{"name":"Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1048666623000496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Healthcare disparities have become a notable topic of research in the last decade. Within orthopedics, minority patients experience these disparities via increased lengths of stay, higher 30-day hospital readmission rates, and poor patient reported outcomes. One possible cause for these disparities is implicit bias held by providers. The aims of this study were to assess the current state of implicit racial biases among orthopedic surgeons at various stages of training and to review the current literature involving effects of implicit bias on healthcare and patient outcomes. Orthopedic surgery medical student subinterns, residents, and attendings at an urban academic medical center were provided an anonymous, voluntary survey to document the results of an online Implicit Association Test (IAT) specifically focusing on race. These results were compared among the three groups and to that of the general population. Our results demonstrated that medical students and residents mirror the general population with an inherent preference for White over Black people. Attendings differed significantly from the general population with the most common result being little to no preference for either race. This small pilot study demonstrated varied IAT results, with both medical students and residents showing a preference for White over Black people, as compared to attendings who showed no preference for either race. Given the small cohort, it is difficult to generalize this data. Regardless, implicit racial biases are prevalent and can lead to poor patient interactions and worse clinical outcomes. The IAT provides a reliable assessment tool for implicit bias and can help guide interventions. Initiating this discussion is invaluable within orthopedics, but more research with larger cohorts is needed to evaluate feasibility of assessing bias and identify successful methods of reducing it.

利用内隐关联测试解决少数民族患者的医疗保健差异问题:在矫形外科队列中发起讨论
在过去十年中,医疗差距已成为一个引人注目的研究课题。在骨科领域,少数族裔患者因住院时间延长、30 天再入院率升高以及患者报告的治疗效果不佳而遭遇这些差异。造成这些差异的一个可能原因是医疗服务提供者的隐性偏见。本研究的目的是评估处于不同培训阶段的矫形外科医生的隐性种族偏见现状,并回顾涉及隐性偏见对医疗保健和患者预后影响的现有文献。研究人员向一家城市学术医疗中心的骨科外科医学生实习生、住院医师和主治医师提供了一份匿名自愿调查表,以记录在线内隐关联测试(IAT)的结果,该测试特别关注种族问题。我们将这三个群体的结果与普通人群的结果进行了比较。我们的结果表明,医学生和住院医师与普通人一样,天生偏爱白人而非黑人。主治医师与普通人群有很大不同,最常见的结果是几乎不偏好任何一个种族。这项小型试点研究显示了不同的 IAT 结果,医学生和住院医师都表现出对白人而非黑人的偏好,而主治医师则对任何种族都没有偏好。由于研究对象人数较少,很难将这些数据一概而论。无论如何,隐性种族偏见是普遍存在的,并可能导致不良的患者互动和更差的临床结果。IAT 提供了一种可靠的隐性偏见评估工具,有助于指导干预措施。在骨科领域发起这一讨论非常有价值,但还需要对更大的群体进行更多的研究,以评估评估偏见的可行性,并确定减少偏见的成功方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics is an innovative, richly illustrated resource that keeps practitioners informed of significant advances in all areas of surgical management. Each issue of this atlas-style journal explores a single topic, often offering alternate approaches to the same procedure. Its current, definitive information keeps readers in the forefront of their specialty.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信