Assessment of personal exposure using movement trajectory and hourly 1-km PM2.5 concentrations

IF 1.4 4区 地球科学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Heming Bai, Junjie Song, Huiqun Wu, Rusha Yan, Wenkang Gao, Muhammad Jawad Hussain
{"title":"Assessment of personal exposure using movement trajectory and hourly 1-km PM2.5 concentrations","authors":"Heming Bai, Junjie Song, Huiqun Wu, Rusha Yan, Wenkang Gao, Muhammad Jawad Hussain","doi":"10.1117/1.jrs.18.012003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most health studies have used residential addresses to assess personal exposure to air pollution. These exposure assessments may suffer from bias due to not considering individual movement. Here, we collected 45,600 hourly movement trajectory data points for 185 individuals in Nanjing from COVID-19 epidemiological surveys. We developed a fusion algorithm to produce hourly 1-km PM2.5 concentrations, with a good performance for out-of-station cross validation (correlation coefficient of 0.89, root-mean-square error of 5.60 μg / m3, and mean absolute error (MAE) of 4.04 μg / m3). Based on these PM2.5 concentrations and location data, PM2.5 exposures considering individual movement were calculated and further compared with residence-based exposures. Our results showed that daily residence-based exposures had an MAE of 0.19 μg / m3 and were underestimated by <1 % overall. For hourly residence-based exposures, the MAE exhibited a diurnal variation: it decreased from 0.58 μg / m3 at 09:00 to 0.44 μg / m3 at 12:00 and then continuously increased to 0.74 μg / m3 at 17:00. The biases also depended on activity types and distances from home to activity locations. Specifically, the largest MAE (3.86 μg / m3) occurred in visits that were among the top four types of activity other than being at home. As distances changed from <10 to >30 km, the degree of underestimation for hourly residence-based exposures increased from 1% to 6%. This trend was more obvious for work activities, suggesting that personal exposure assessments should consider individual movement for work cases with long commuting distances.","PeriodicalId":54879,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Remote Sensing","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jrs.18.012003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most health studies have used residential addresses to assess personal exposure to air pollution. These exposure assessments may suffer from bias due to not considering individual movement. Here, we collected 45,600 hourly movement trajectory data points for 185 individuals in Nanjing from COVID-19 epidemiological surveys. We developed a fusion algorithm to produce hourly 1-km PM2.5 concentrations, with a good performance for out-of-station cross validation (correlation coefficient of 0.89, root-mean-square error of 5.60 μg / m3, and mean absolute error (MAE) of 4.04 μg / m3). Based on these PM2.5 concentrations and location data, PM2.5 exposures considering individual movement were calculated and further compared with residence-based exposures. Our results showed that daily residence-based exposures had an MAE of 0.19 μg / m3 and were underestimated by <1 % overall. For hourly residence-based exposures, the MAE exhibited a diurnal variation: it decreased from 0.58 μg / m3 at 09:00 to 0.44 μg / m3 at 12:00 and then continuously increased to 0.74 μg / m3 at 17:00. The biases also depended on activity types and distances from home to activity locations. Specifically, the largest MAE (3.86 μg / m3) occurred in visits that were among the top four types of activity other than being at home. As distances changed from <10 to >30 km, the degree of underestimation for hourly residence-based exposures increased from 1% to 6%. This trend was more obvious for work activities, suggesting that personal exposure assessments should consider individual movement for work cases with long commuting distances.
利用运动轨迹和每小时1公里PM2.5浓度评估个人暴露
大多数健康研究都使用居住地址来评估个人对空气污染的暴露程度。由于没有考虑个体的运动,这些暴露评估可能存在偏差。在这里,我们从南京的185人的COVID-19流行病学调查中收集了45600个小时的运动轨迹数据点。我们开发了一种每小时1公里PM2.5浓度的融合算法,具有良好的站外交叉验证性能(相关系数为0.89,均方根误差为5.60 μg / m3,平均绝对误差(MAE)为4.04 μg / m3)。基于这些PM2.5浓度和位置数据,计算了考虑个体移动的PM2.5暴露量,并进一步与基于居住地的暴露量进行了比较。结果表明,日暴露的MAE为0.19 μg / m3,被低估了30 km,小时暴露的低估程度从1%增加到6%。这一趋势在工作活动中更为明显,这表明个人暴露评估应考虑通勤距离较长的工作案例的个人运动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Remote Sensing
Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 环境科学-成像科学与照相技术
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
194
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Remote Sensing is a peer-reviewed journal that optimizes the communication of concepts, information, and progress among the remote sensing community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信