It is top-down governance: examining environmental public-private partnerships in China

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Liying Zhang, Xuhong Su
{"title":"It is top-down governance: examining environmental public-private partnerships in China","authors":"Liying Zhang, Xuhong Su","doi":"10.1080/23276665.2023.2258518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTPublic-private partnerships have been touted as an importantgovernance tool. To what extent efficiency gains are internalizedinto the governance scheme remains open. This study proposes a nestedmodel suggesting that the development of PPPs is enabled andconstrained by project features, local contexts and (top-down)governance scheme. Based on 325 environmental PPP projects in China,the multilevel models suggest when government payment or subsidy wereinvolved, the development of PPPs was not driven by efficiency gainsbut empowered by top-down governance. While efficiency gainsmattered, user fees also prevailed more when certain governingarrangements were place. PPPs in China serve and are also constrainedby top-down governance, raising potential concerns on efficiency andpublic accountability.KEYWORDS: Public–private partnershipstop-down governanceefficiency gains Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationNotes on contributorsLiying ZhangDr. Liying Zhang is an assistant professor in the Department of Public Administraiton at the Tianjin University of Finance and Economics in China. Her research interest has been in collaborative governance, emergency management and public administration.Xuhong SuDr. Xuhong Su is an associate professor in the Baker School at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Her research interests have been focused on both public administration, public management, and scientific workforce policy.","PeriodicalId":43945,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2023.2258518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTPublic-private partnerships have been touted as an importantgovernance tool. To what extent efficiency gains are internalizedinto the governance scheme remains open. This study proposes a nestedmodel suggesting that the development of PPPs is enabled andconstrained by project features, local contexts and (top-down)governance scheme. Based on 325 environmental PPP projects in China,the multilevel models suggest when government payment or subsidy wereinvolved, the development of PPPs was not driven by efficiency gainsbut empowered by top-down governance. While efficiency gainsmattered, user fees also prevailed more when certain governingarrangements were place. PPPs in China serve and are also constrainedby top-down governance, raising potential concerns on efficiency andpublic accountability.KEYWORDS: Public–private partnershipstop-down governanceefficiency gains Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationNotes on contributorsLiying ZhangDr. Liying Zhang is an assistant professor in the Department of Public Administraiton at the Tianjin University of Finance and Economics in China. Her research interest has been in collaborative governance, emergency management and public administration.Xuhong SuDr. Xuhong Su is an associate professor in the Baker School at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Her research interests have been focused on both public administration, public management, and scientific workforce policy.
它是自上而下的治理:考察中国的环境公私合作关系
摘要公私伙伴关系一直被吹捧为一种重要的治理工具。至于效率提升在多大程度上被内部化到治理方案中,仍不得而知。本研究提出了一个嵌套模型,表明ppp的发展受到项目特征、当地环境和(自上而下)治理方案的推动和制约。基于中国325个环境PPP项目的多层次模型表明,当涉及政府支付或补贴时,PPP的发展不是由效率收益驱动的,而是由自上而下的治理赋予的。虽然提高效率很重要,但在某些治理安排到位的情况下,用户收费也更为普遍。在中国,公私伙伴关系服务于自上而下的治理,同时也受到自上而下治理的制约,这引发了对效率和公共问责制的潜在担忧。关键词:公私合作停止治理效率收益披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。作者简介:张颖博士张丽颖,天津财经大学公共管理系助理教授。她的研究兴趣一直是协同治理、应急管理和公共管理。Xuhong SuDr。苏旭宏是美国田纳西大学诺克斯维尔分校贝克学院的副教授。她的研究兴趣主要集中在公共行政、公共管理和科学劳动力政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
20.70%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信