J.J.R. Macleod: Misunderstood, Misinterpreted, and Maligned

IF 0.4 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
James R. Wright
{"title":"J.J.R. Macleod: Misunderstood, Misinterpreted, and Maligned","authors":"James R. Wright","doi":"10.3138/cjhh.598-072022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. After the discovery of insulin at the University of Toronto in 1921–22, Frederick Banting and Charles Best downplayed the contributions of physiology professor John James Rickard Macleod, the director of the laboratory where the discovery was made. Banting and Best, their allies, and to a lesser extent the university promoted a “fairy tale” version in which the two young investigators made the discovery on their own, creating the so-called “Banting and Best myth.” Over the next 60 years, the myth prevailed and Macleod's reputation became increasingly tarnished, with both Banting and Best actively maligning their former mentor. While the publication of Michael Bliss’ The Discovery of Insulin in 1982 placed Macleod's reputation on the road to recovery, there are still many lingering issues that have been raised, and Macleod remains misunderstood, misinterpreted, and maligned. This paper, using primary and secondary historical sources, addresses topics that have been repetitively raised by Macleod's detractors over the past century.","PeriodicalId":55634,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Bulletin of Medical History","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Bulletin of Medical History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhh.598-072022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. After the discovery of insulin at the University of Toronto in 1921–22, Frederick Banting and Charles Best downplayed the contributions of physiology professor John James Rickard Macleod, the director of the laboratory where the discovery was made. Banting and Best, their allies, and to a lesser extent the university promoted a “fairy tale” version in which the two young investigators made the discovery on their own, creating the so-called “Banting and Best myth.” Over the next 60 years, the myth prevailed and Macleod's reputation became increasingly tarnished, with both Banting and Best actively maligning their former mentor. While the publication of Michael Bliss’ The Discovery of Insulin in 1982 placed Macleod's reputation on the road to recovery, there are still many lingering issues that have been raised, and Macleod remains misunderstood, misinterpreted, and maligned. This paper, using primary and secondary historical sources, addresses topics that have been repetitively raised by Macleod's detractors over the past century.
J.J.R.麦克劳德:被误解,被曲解,被诽谤
摘要1921年至1922年,在多伦多大学发现胰岛素后,弗雷德里克·班廷和查尔斯·贝斯特淡化了生理学教授约翰·詹姆斯·里卡德·麦克劳德的贡献,后者是发现胰岛素的实验室主任。班廷和贝斯特是他们的盟友,在较小程度上,哈佛大学推广了一个“童话”版本,即两位年轻的研究者自己发现了这一发现,创造了所谓的“班廷和贝斯特神话”。在接下来的60年里,这个神话盛行,麦克劳德的名声越来越坏,班廷和贝斯特都在积极诋毁他们的前导师。1982年迈克尔·布利斯的《胰岛素的发现》一书的出版使麦克劳德的名声走上了恢复的道路,但仍有许多悬而未决的问题被提出,麦克劳德仍然被误解、误读和诽谤。本文利用主要和次要的历史资料,讨论了在过去一个世纪里麦克劳德的批评者反复提出的话题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Bulletin of Medical History
Canadian Bulletin of Medical History HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Canadian Bulletin of Medical History / Bulletin canadien d"histoire de la médecine is the official organ of the Canadian Society for the History of Medicine/ Société canadienne d"histoire de la médecine and is the primary outlet in Canada for refereed scholarship in the history of medicine. This journal, published twice yearly, presents articles, notes, review articles, and book reviews in French and in English. No aspect of the general field is excluded as a matter of policy, though the particular focus is on scholarship in Canadian medical history.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信