{"title":"Reel Philanthropy: Lessons in Love Using Autoethnographic Filmmaking in Public Affairs Education","authors":"Lindsey M. McDougle, Rauzar Alexander","doi":"10.1080/10999922.2023.2262209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractLove is at the heart of the mission of public service. Nevertheless, the field of public administration has drifted away from this core principle. In this article, we propose an approach to integrating philanthropy education into the public affairs curriculum that could realign public service with its mission to love. We identify, however, a significant challenge that persists. That is, traditional philanthropic education often emphasizes “elite philanthropy” tied to unequal wealth distribution (what we refer to here as philanthropy’s hegemonic archetype). Thus, traditional philanthropic education, although conceptually rooted in love, is generally far removed from notions of love. To overcome this challenge, we focus on the use of experiential philanthropy as a means to empower students to engage in meaningful philanthropic acts. However, we acknowledge that the approach may not completely transform students due to, what studies have found to be, its oftentimes short-term impact. We, therefore, explore how combining experiential philanthropy with methods of auto-inquiry, specifically autoethnographic filmmaking, can liberate philanthropy from its “elite” image and sustain students’ genuine commitment to love—and ultimately to public service.Keywords: Experiential philanthropyfilmmakingautoethnographycritical thinkingpedagogy Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Self-reflection focuses on one’s thoughts, feelings, and actions, whereas self-reflexivity is a way of being that involves noticing patterns in one’s experience. According to Nagata (Citation2004), “self-reflexivity can be understood as having an ongoing conversation with one’s whole self about what one is experiencing as one is experiencing it. To be self-reflexive is to engage in this meta-level of feeling and thought while being in the moment” (p. 141).2 It should be noted that inevitably one must rely on tenets of autobiography in order to conduct autoethnography.","PeriodicalId":51805,"journal":{"name":"Public Integrity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Integrity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2023.2262209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AbstractLove is at the heart of the mission of public service. Nevertheless, the field of public administration has drifted away from this core principle. In this article, we propose an approach to integrating philanthropy education into the public affairs curriculum that could realign public service with its mission to love. We identify, however, a significant challenge that persists. That is, traditional philanthropic education often emphasizes “elite philanthropy” tied to unequal wealth distribution (what we refer to here as philanthropy’s hegemonic archetype). Thus, traditional philanthropic education, although conceptually rooted in love, is generally far removed from notions of love. To overcome this challenge, we focus on the use of experiential philanthropy as a means to empower students to engage in meaningful philanthropic acts. However, we acknowledge that the approach may not completely transform students due to, what studies have found to be, its oftentimes short-term impact. We, therefore, explore how combining experiential philanthropy with methods of auto-inquiry, specifically autoethnographic filmmaking, can liberate philanthropy from its “elite” image and sustain students’ genuine commitment to love—and ultimately to public service.Keywords: Experiential philanthropyfilmmakingautoethnographycritical thinkingpedagogy Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Self-reflection focuses on one’s thoughts, feelings, and actions, whereas self-reflexivity is a way of being that involves noticing patterns in one’s experience. According to Nagata (Citation2004), “self-reflexivity can be understood as having an ongoing conversation with one’s whole self about what one is experiencing as one is experiencing it. To be self-reflexive is to engage in this meta-level of feeling and thought while being in the moment” (p. 141).2 It should be noted that inevitably one must rely on tenets of autobiography in order to conduct autoethnography.