{"title":"Understanding the efficiency and evolution of China's Green Economy: A province-level analysis","authors":"Yanyong Hu, Xuchao Zhang, Jiaxi Wu, Zheng Meng","doi":"10.1177/0958305x231204027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The efficiency level, evolution characteristics, and factors driving the green economy in all provinces and regions should be clarified to achieve high-quality economic development and meet China's “double carbon” target. This study conducted the Super-Effective Slack-Based Model considering unexpected outputs to evaluate province-level Green Economic Efficiency (GEE) analysis (including 30 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government) in China from 2005 to 2020. Moreover, the distribution and dynamic evolution trend of GEE development was estimated through Kernel density estimation. Besides, GEE and its factors (i.e., industrial structure rationalization [ISR], industrial structure advancement [ISA], and urbanization level [UL]) were examined using a Panel vector autoregressive model that was built in this study. As indicated by the result of this study, China's GEE level generally displayed a “U-shaped” development trend of declining, stabilizing, and then rising, whereas the overall efficiency level is low, where the national GEE average reached 0.6934. The regional GEE level exhibited a significant “ladder” distribution, with the highest level, the second level, and the lowest level in the east, the middle, and the west, respectively. The GEE level varied significantly with the province, and most of the levels were at a medium efficiency level. Notably, 60% of regions had medium efficiency in 2020. The levels of ISR, ISA, and UL play significant roles in boosting green economic growth. This study provides valuable insights into the drivers of green economic growth in China guiding policy decisions on achieving a sustainable and low-carbon economy. As China strives to fulfill its ambitious carbon reduction goals, the findings of this study highlight the significance of continuing to prioritize green economic development at the provincial level.","PeriodicalId":11652,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Environment","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x231204027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The efficiency level, evolution characteristics, and factors driving the green economy in all provinces and regions should be clarified to achieve high-quality economic development and meet China's “double carbon” target. This study conducted the Super-Effective Slack-Based Model considering unexpected outputs to evaluate province-level Green Economic Efficiency (GEE) analysis (including 30 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government) in China from 2005 to 2020. Moreover, the distribution and dynamic evolution trend of GEE development was estimated through Kernel density estimation. Besides, GEE and its factors (i.e., industrial structure rationalization [ISR], industrial structure advancement [ISA], and urbanization level [UL]) were examined using a Panel vector autoregressive model that was built in this study. As indicated by the result of this study, China's GEE level generally displayed a “U-shaped” development trend of declining, stabilizing, and then rising, whereas the overall efficiency level is low, where the national GEE average reached 0.6934. The regional GEE level exhibited a significant “ladder” distribution, with the highest level, the second level, and the lowest level in the east, the middle, and the west, respectively. The GEE level varied significantly with the province, and most of the levels were at a medium efficiency level. Notably, 60% of regions had medium efficiency in 2020. The levels of ISR, ISA, and UL play significant roles in boosting green economic growth. This study provides valuable insights into the drivers of green economic growth in China guiding policy decisions on achieving a sustainable and low-carbon economy. As China strives to fulfill its ambitious carbon reduction goals, the findings of this study highlight the significance of continuing to prioritize green economic development at the provincial level.
期刊介绍:
Energy & Environment is an interdisciplinary journal inviting energy policy analysts, natural scientists and engineers, as well as lawyers and economists to contribute to mutual understanding and learning, believing that better communication between experts will enhance the quality of policy, advance social well-being and help to reduce conflict. The journal encourages dialogue between the social sciences as energy demand and supply are observed and analysed with reference to politics of policy-making and implementation. The rapidly evolving social and environmental impacts of energy supply, transport, production and use at all levels require contribution from many disciplines if policy is to be effective. In particular E & E invite contributions from the study of policy delivery, ultimately more important than policy formation. The geopolitics of energy are also important, as are the impacts of environmental regulations and advancing technologies on national and local politics, and even global energy politics. Energy & Environment is a forum for constructive, professional information sharing, as well as debate across disciplines and professions, including the financial sector. Mathematical articles are outside the scope of Energy & Environment. The broader policy implications of submitted research should be addressed and environmental implications, not just emission quantities, be discussed with reference to scientific assumptions. This applies especially to technical papers based on arguments suggested by other disciplines, funding bodies or directly by policy-makers.