{"title":"Evaluating the efficacy and safety of differing gun caliber and ammunition combinations for the euthanasia or depopulation of market-weight pigs","authors":"Chad Stahl, Thomas Fangman, John Fangman","doi":"10.54846/jshap/1342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Evaluate the effectiveness and safety of firearm caliber and ammunition combinations that could be used on farm for euthanasia of market-weight pigs. Materials and methods: Heads from 64 market-age pigs (32 barrows and 32 gilts) were collected from a federally inspected slaughter facility. Heads were randomly assigned to one of 4 caliber and ammunition combinations: .22 long rifle (LR), .22 Magnum (Mag), .38 Special, and 9 mm. The fully jacketed ammunition was discharged from each of the 4 unique firearms (each with a 16-in barrel length) while ensuring a consistent muzzle to forehead distance of 12.7 cm. Results: The 9 mm bullets traveled further through the head and into the ballistic gel (P < .001) and the furthest total distance (P < .001). Bullets from the .38 Special traveled further into the ballistic gel and a further total distance than both the .22 LR and .22 Mag (P < .001). The trauma area of the brain was greater for the 9 mm and the .38 Special bullets when compared to .22 LR or .22 Mag, respectively (P < .001). There was no difference in the trauma area of the brain for the .22 LR bullets compared to .22 Mag bullets (P = .12). Implications: This proof-of-concept study generated data to define efficacy and safety considerations when using a firearm to euthanize market-weight pigs and demonstrated that the .22 LR full metal jacket bullet could provide predictable euthanasia in market-weight pigs with minimal risk of contralateral emergence.","PeriodicalId":17095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Swine Health and Production","volume":"16 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Swine Health and Production","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54846/jshap/1342","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Evaluate the effectiveness and safety of firearm caliber and ammunition combinations that could be used on farm for euthanasia of market-weight pigs. Materials and methods: Heads from 64 market-age pigs (32 barrows and 32 gilts) were collected from a federally inspected slaughter facility. Heads were randomly assigned to one of 4 caliber and ammunition combinations: .22 long rifle (LR), .22 Magnum (Mag), .38 Special, and 9 mm. The fully jacketed ammunition was discharged from each of the 4 unique firearms (each with a 16-in barrel length) while ensuring a consistent muzzle to forehead distance of 12.7 cm. Results: The 9 mm bullets traveled further through the head and into the ballistic gel (P < .001) and the furthest total distance (P < .001). Bullets from the .38 Special traveled further into the ballistic gel and a further total distance than both the .22 LR and .22 Mag (P < .001). The trauma area of the brain was greater for the 9 mm and the .38 Special bullets when compared to .22 LR or .22 Mag, respectively (P < .001). There was no difference in the trauma area of the brain for the .22 LR bullets compared to .22 Mag bullets (P = .12). Implications: This proof-of-concept study generated data to define efficacy and safety considerations when using a firearm to euthanize market-weight pigs and demonstrated that the .22 LR full metal jacket bullet could provide predictable euthanasia in market-weight pigs with minimal risk of contralateral emergence.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Swine Health & Production (JSHAP) is an open-access and peer-reviewed journal published by the American Association of Swine Veterinarians (AASV) since 1993. The aim of the journal is the timely publication of peer-reviewed papers with a scope that encompasses the many domains of applied swine health and production, including the diagnosis, treatment, management, prevention and eradication of swine diseases, welfare & behavior, nutrition, public health, epidemiology, food safety, biosecurity, pharmaceuticals, antimicrobial use and resistance, reproduction, growth, systems flow, economics, and facility design. The journal provides a platform for researchers, veterinary practitioners, academics, and students to share their work with an international audience. The journal publishes information that contains an applied and practical focus and presents scientific information that is accessible to the busy veterinary practitioner as well as to the research and academic community. Hence, manuscripts with an applied focus are considered for publication, and the journal publishes original research, brief communications, case reports/series, literature reviews, commentaries, diagnostic notes, production tools, and practice tips. All manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Swine Health & Production are peer-reviewed.