A Network Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Targeted Drug Combinations in the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Rui Wang, Meng Wei, Jie Wang, Xiang Huang, Qianzhi Yan, Shichao Wang, Yun Wu
{"title":"A Network Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Targeted Drug Combinations in the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension","authors":"Rui Wang, Meng Wei, Jie Wang, Xiang Huang, Qianzhi Yan, Shichao Wang, Yun Wu","doi":"10.1097/cd9.0000000000000105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This network meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of different targeted drug combination treatment for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Methods: Searches were conducted in Cochrane, PubMed, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Biomedical Literature Database, Wanfang Database, and VIP Chinese Science and Technology Journal Data to identify both published and unpublished randomized controlled trials from inception until January 1, 2022. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. A network meta-analysis was performed using Stata 16.0 software. The efficacy and safety of different targeted drugs combined treatment for PAH were evaluated based on forest plot, funnel plot, and surface under the cumulative ranking. Results: A total of 29 randomized controlled trails with 4,448 patients treated with 10 different types of targeted drug combinations were included in this study. The results of the surface under the cumulative ranking showed that the combination regimen was the best clinical option to improve symptoms and delay progression in patients with pulmonary artery hypertension compared with monotherapy. Sildenafil in combination with ambrisentan significantly improved the 6-minute walk distance and reduced N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels. Bosentan in combination with sildenafil significantly reduced mean pulmonary artery pressure, whereas bosentan in combination with epoprostenol was more effective than other combinations in reducing pulmonary vascular resistance. Bosentan in combination with tadalafil significantly improved the Borg dyspnea score, and bosentan in combination with iloprost was the best combination for improving World Health Organization functional class/New York Heart Association functional class. In terms of safety, there was no significant reduction in the incidence of adverse events, hospitalizations, or all-cause mortality for combination therapy compared with monotherapy. Bosentan combined with sildenafil significantly reduced the risk of serious adverse events, but the risk of discontinuation due to an adverse event was higher than monotherapy. Sildenafil combined with epoprostenol reduced the risk of clinical worsening in patients with PAH. Conclusion: Compared with monotherapy, targeted drug combinations for PAH significantly improves exercise tolerance, pulmonary hemodynamic parameters, and reduces the risk of serious adverse events and clinical worsening in patients. Bosentan in combination with sildenafil and bosentan in combination with iloprost are combinations of targeted agents with significant efficacy and better safety profile than monotherapy for the treatment of PAH. Sildenafil in combination with epoprostenol has a low risk of clinical worsening in PAH.","PeriodicalId":72524,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology discovery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/cd9.0000000000000105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This network meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of different targeted drug combination treatment for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Methods: Searches were conducted in Cochrane, PubMed, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Biomedical Literature Database, Wanfang Database, and VIP Chinese Science and Technology Journal Data to identify both published and unpublished randomized controlled trials from inception until January 1, 2022. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. A network meta-analysis was performed using Stata 16.0 software. The efficacy and safety of different targeted drugs combined treatment for PAH were evaluated based on forest plot, funnel plot, and surface under the cumulative ranking. Results: A total of 29 randomized controlled trails with 4,448 patients treated with 10 different types of targeted drug combinations were included in this study. The results of the surface under the cumulative ranking showed that the combination regimen was the best clinical option to improve symptoms and delay progression in patients with pulmonary artery hypertension compared with monotherapy. Sildenafil in combination with ambrisentan significantly improved the 6-minute walk distance and reduced N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels. Bosentan in combination with sildenafil significantly reduced mean pulmonary artery pressure, whereas bosentan in combination with epoprostenol was more effective than other combinations in reducing pulmonary vascular resistance. Bosentan in combination with tadalafil significantly improved the Borg dyspnea score, and bosentan in combination with iloprost was the best combination for improving World Health Organization functional class/New York Heart Association functional class. In terms of safety, there was no significant reduction in the incidence of adverse events, hospitalizations, or all-cause mortality for combination therapy compared with monotherapy. Bosentan combined with sildenafil significantly reduced the risk of serious adverse events, but the risk of discontinuation due to an adverse event was higher than monotherapy. Sildenafil combined with epoprostenol reduced the risk of clinical worsening in patients with PAH. Conclusion: Compared with monotherapy, targeted drug combinations for PAH significantly improves exercise tolerance, pulmonary hemodynamic parameters, and reduces the risk of serious adverse events and clinical worsening in patients. Bosentan in combination with sildenafil and bosentan in combination with iloprost are combinations of targeted agents with significant efficacy and better safety profile than monotherapy for the treatment of PAH. Sildenafil in combination with epoprostenol has a low risk of clinical worsening in PAH.
靶向药物联合治疗肺动脉高压疗效和安全性的网络meta分析
目的:本网络荟萃分析旨在比较不同靶向药物联合治疗肺动脉高压(PAH)的疗效和安全性。方法:检索Cochrane、PubMed、EMBASE、中国国家知识基础设施、中国生物医学文献数据库、万方数据库和VIP中国科技期刊数据,确定从开始到2022年1月1日已发表和未发表的随机对照试验。纳入研究的偏倚风险按照Cochrane干预措施系统评价手册进行评估。采用Stata 16.0软件进行网络meta分析。在累积排序下,采用森林图、漏斗图、面法评价不同靶向药物联合治疗多环芳烃的疗效和安全性。结果:本研究共纳入29条随机对照试验,共4448例患者接受10种不同类型的靶向药物联合治疗。累积排名下的表面结果显示,与单药治疗相比,联合治疗方案是改善肺动脉高压患者症状和延缓病情进展的最佳临床选择。西地那非联合安布里森坦可显著改善6分钟步行距离,降低n端前脑利钠肽水平。波生坦联合西地那非显著降低平均肺动脉压,而波生坦联合丙烯醇在降低肺血管阻力方面比其他联合更有效。波生坦联合他达拉非可显著改善Borg呼吸困难评分,而波生坦联合伊洛前列素是改善世界卫生组织功能分级/纽约心脏协会功能分级的最佳组合。在安全性方面,与单一治疗相比,联合治疗的不良事件发生率、住院率或全因死亡率没有显著降低。波生坦联合西地那非显著降低了严重不良事件的风险,但因不良事件而停药的风险高于单药治疗。西地那非联合丙烯醇可降低PAH患者临床恶化的风险。结论:与单药治疗相比,靶向药物联合治疗PAH可显著提高患者的运动耐量、肺血流动力学参数,降低患者发生严重不良事件和临床恶化的风险。波生坦联合西地那非和波生坦联合伊洛前列素是治疗多环芳烃的靶向药物组合,其疗效显著,安全性优于单药治疗。西地那非联合丙烯醇在PAH中临床恶化的风险较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信