Reliability of the 15-s Maximal Lactate Accumulation Rate (VLamax) Test for Cycling

Christopher R. Harnish, Thomas C. Swensen, Deborah King
{"title":"Reliability of the 15-s Maximal Lactate Accumulation Rate (VLamax) Test for Cycling","authors":"Christopher R. Harnish, Thomas C. Swensen, Deborah King","doi":"10.3390/physiologia3040040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The purpose of this study is to ascertain the reliability of two 15-s sprint cycling tests in men and women to estimate the maximum lactate accumulation rate (VLamax). Methods: Eighteen men and twelve women completed two sprint sessions over 1 week. A 10 min warm-up preceded the obtaining of a 3 µL blood lactate (BLC) sample, after which a 15 s sprint was completed; cyclists then rested passively while multiple lactate samples were taken until the levels peaked. Trial differences and reliability across trials were analyzed using a paired-sample t-test, Pearson’s correlation, Intraclass correlation (ICC), and Bland–Altman analysis with α = 0.05 for all tests; data are reported as mean ± sd. Results: Power (W) was similar across trials (773.0 ± 143.5 vs. 758.2 ± 127.4; p = 0.333) and the coefficient of variation (CV) of 4.7%. VLamax (mM·L−1·s−1) was similar (0.673 ± 0.024 vs. 0.635 ± 0.237; p = 0.280), but only moderately reliable across trials with CV, ICC, and R values of 18.6%, 0.661, and 0.67, respectively. Pre-BLC and peak BLC CV were 45.6 and 23.3%, respectively. Conclusions: A 15 s VLamax cycling sprint is moderately reliable, possibly affected both by the lactate measurement and other variables used in the calculation. More research may offer ways to improve reliability.","PeriodicalId":93484,"journal":{"name":"Physiologia","volume":"55 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/physiologia3040040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study is to ascertain the reliability of two 15-s sprint cycling tests in men and women to estimate the maximum lactate accumulation rate (VLamax). Methods: Eighteen men and twelve women completed two sprint sessions over 1 week. A 10 min warm-up preceded the obtaining of a 3 µL blood lactate (BLC) sample, after which a 15 s sprint was completed; cyclists then rested passively while multiple lactate samples were taken until the levels peaked. Trial differences and reliability across trials were analyzed using a paired-sample t-test, Pearson’s correlation, Intraclass correlation (ICC), and Bland–Altman analysis with α = 0.05 for all tests; data are reported as mean ± sd. Results: Power (W) was similar across trials (773.0 ± 143.5 vs. 758.2 ± 127.4; p = 0.333) and the coefficient of variation (CV) of 4.7%. VLamax (mM·L−1·s−1) was similar (0.673 ± 0.024 vs. 0.635 ± 0.237; p = 0.280), but only moderately reliable across trials with CV, ICC, and R values of 18.6%, 0.661, and 0.67, respectively. Pre-BLC and peak BLC CV were 45.6 and 23.3%, respectively. Conclusions: A 15 s VLamax cycling sprint is moderately reliable, possibly affected both by the lactate measurement and other variables used in the calculation. More research may offer ways to improve reliability.
15-s最大乳酸积累率(VLamax)试验的可靠性
背景:本研究的目的是确定两个15秒冲刺自行车测试在男性和女性估计最大乳酸积累率(VLamax)的可靠性。方法:18名男性和12名女性在一周内完成了两次冲刺。在获得3µL血乳酸(BLC)样本前进行10分钟热身,然后进行15 s冲刺;然后骑车者被动休息,同时采集多个乳酸样本,直到乳酸水平达到峰值。采用配对样本t检验、Pearson相关、类内相关(ICC)和Bland-Altman分析分析试验间的试验差异和信度,所有试验均采用α = 0.05;数据以mean±sd报告。结果:各试验的功率(W)相似(773.0±143.5 vs 758.2±127.4;p = 0.333),变异系数(CV)为4.7%。VLamax (mM·L−1·s−1)相似(0.673±0.024∶0.635±0.237;p = 0.280),但在CV、ICC和R值分别为18.6%、0.661和0.67的试验中仅具有中等可靠性。BLC前CV和峰值CV分别为45.6%和23.3%。结论:15s VLamax循环冲刺具有中等可靠性,可能受到乳酸测量和计算中使用的其他变量的影响。更多的研究可能会提供提高可靠性的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信