{"title":"Epigram Reading Epigram: Antipater of Sidon “Coming Second” (<i>Anth. Pal.</i> 9.25)","authors":"Simon Zuenelli","doi":"10.1086/726650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anthologia Palatina 9.25, an important testimonium for the reception of Aratus’ Phaenomena, is either ascribed to Leonidas of Tarentum or Antipater in the manuscript tradition. In this article, I propose that the epigram was authored by Antipater of Sidon. First, I demonstrate that the poem, which—as I suggest—is modeled on Callimachus 56 HE (Epigr. 27 Pf.), self-consciously reflects its own secondary position within the literary tradition. Secondly, I show that this interest in epigonism is closely paralleled by epigrams authored by Antipater of Sidon, which exhibit both a similar imitative method and an interest in “secondness.” In so doing, my analysis also suggests innovative approaches for the readings of several of Antipater’s epigrams and sheds new light on his poetics of imitation more generally.","PeriodicalId":46255,"journal":{"name":"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726650","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Anthologia Palatina 9.25, an important testimonium for the reception of Aratus’ Phaenomena, is either ascribed to Leonidas of Tarentum or Antipater in the manuscript tradition. In this article, I propose that the epigram was authored by Antipater of Sidon. First, I demonstrate that the poem, which—as I suggest—is modeled on Callimachus 56 HE (Epigr. 27 Pf.), self-consciously reflects its own secondary position within the literary tradition. Secondly, I show that this interest in epigonism is closely paralleled by epigrams authored by Antipater of Sidon, which exhibit both a similar imitative method and an interest in “secondness.” In so doing, my analysis also suggests innovative approaches for the readings of several of Antipater’s epigrams and sheds new light on his poetics of imitation more generally.
《Palatina选集》9.25,是接受阿拉图斯现象的重要证词,在手稿传统中,要么归因于塔伦图姆的列奥尼达,要么归因于安提帕特。在这篇文章中,我认为这句警句是西顿的安提帕特写的。首先,我证明了这首诗,正如我所建议的,是模仿卡利马库斯56 HE (Epigr. 27 Pf.),自觉地反映了它在文学传统中的次要地位。其次,我表明,这种对警句的兴趣与西顿的安提帕特所写的警句密切相关,这些警句表现出类似的模仿方法和对“第二性”的兴趣。在这样做的过程中,我的分析也为安提帕特的几句警句的阅读提供了创新的方法,并更广泛地揭示了他的模仿诗学。
期刊介绍:
Classical Philology has been an internationally respected journal for the study of the life, languages, and thought of the Ancient Greek and Roman world since 1906. CP covers a broad range of topics from a variety of interpretative points of view. CP welcomes both longer articles and short notes or discussions that make a significant contribution to the study of Greek and Roman antiquity. Any field of classical studies may be treated, separately or in relation to other disciplines, ancient or modern. In particular, we invite studies that illuminate aspects of the languages, literatures, history, art, philosophy, social life, and religion of ancient Greece and Rome. Innovative approaches and originality are encouraged as a necessary part of good scholarship.