La República de Texas (1836–1845): Escisión y anexión by Jaime Cárdenas Gracia (review)

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
Jesús F. de la Teja
{"title":"La República de Texas (1836–1845): Escisión y anexión by Jaime Cárdenas Gracia (review)","authors":"Jesús F. de la Teja","doi":"10.1353/swh.2023.a907802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: La República de Texas (1836–1845): Escisión y anexión by Jaime Cárdenas Gracia Jesús F. de la Teja Jaime Cárdenas Gracia, La República de Texas (1836–1845): Escisión y anexión (Mexico: Universidad Autónoma de México, 2022. Pp. Xii, 214. Notes, bibliography.) As the author of this book on the Texas republic era informs us various times, Mexican scholars have shown only limited interest in Texas history, mostly in connection to the two issues noted in the book's subtitle: excision and annexation. As a legal scholar, Cárdenas takes a distinct approach, and he gamely attempts to tell the story of the Republic, particularly in juridical terms. The resulting work in the end continues the very tradition of Mexican scholarship on Texas that he critiques; yet, it does so in an updated way that takes into consideration the direction in which recent Texas historiography of the period has been headed while not engaging it as thoroughly as possible. Perhaps because he is a legal scholar, Cárdenas attempts to present the story of Texas's separation from Mexico and eventual annexation to the United States within the broad framework of the law of nations. The first chapter presents the argument that under today's international legal framework, the movement of Texas from Mexican sovereignty to United States acquisition would be illegal. Crimea, Scotland, and Catalonia are used as examples of how the modern system works. In contrast, what happened with Texas falls under the tradition prevailing in the early nineteenth century that recognition merely required three elements: population, territory, and government. His bottom line is that what happened with Texas was a case of \"might makes right.\" Mexico certainly made its share of mistakes, but these did not rise to the level of deserving to have its territory dismembered, as eventually came to pass following the Mexican War. There follow chapters on the Constitution of 1836, what the author calls the \"years of the Republic,\" and on the annexation process. None of these offer much that is not well known to a Texas audience, although they would fill in a great deal of detail for a Mexican audience unfamiliar [End Page 233] with how the Texas constitution diverged from that of the United States. That audience will also benefit from understanding that the differences between Texas presidents Sam Houston and Mirabeau Lamar were substantial and impactful on both relations with Mexico and the annexation process. The book ends with a chapter on slavery, the major conclusion of which follows the recent trend of rejecting the traditional view that the peculiar institution was not a direct cause of the Revolution. To the contrary, following in the steps of Andrew Torget (whom he does not cite) and Alice Baumgartner (whom he does), the author concludes that slavery was not only the most important factor in bringing about the Texas revolt, given the growing antipathy of Mexico's political classes with the institution, but that it served the interests of the United States. Unfortunately, the Mexican reader will find almost nothing about his Texas compatriots in this work. Except for Juan Seguin as a military leader during the Revolution, there is no mention of the Mexican-Texan population. He notes at the end of the book that Mexican scholars should try to understand the circumstances of Mexican Texans, but he could have taken a step in that direction by referring to the growing literature on the subject over the last thirty years. Consequently, while Mexican readers will get a general idea of the process by which Texas became independent, developed as a republic, then became part of the United States, particularly in juridical terms, the most that an English-language audience will get from the book is a better idea of how and why Mexican scholars continue to focus on the Anglo American versus Mexican government struggle. Jesús F. de la Teja Texas State University (Emeritus) Copyright © 2022 The Texas State Historical Association","PeriodicalId":42779,"journal":{"name":"SOUTHWESTERN HISTORICAL QUARTERLY","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOUTHWESTERN HISTORICAL QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/swh.2023.a907802","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reviewed by: La República de Texas (1836–1845): Escisión y anexión by Jaime Cárdenas Gracia Jesús F. de la Teja Jaime Cárdenas Gracia, La República de Texas (1836–1845): Escisión y anexión (Mexico: Universidad Autónoma de México, 2022. Pp. Xii, 214. Notes, bibliography.) As the author of this book on the Texas republic era informs us various times, Mexican scholars have shown only limited interest in Texas history, mostly in connection to the two issues noted in the book's subtitle: excision and annexation. As a legal scholar, Cárdenas takes a distinct approach, and he gamely attempts to tell the story of the Republic, particularly in juridical terms. The resulting work in the end continues the very tradition of Mexican scholarship on Texas that he critiques; yet, it does so in an updated way that takes into consideration the direction in which recent Texas historiography of the period has been headed while not engaging it as thoroughly as possible. Perhaps because he is a legal scholar, Cárdenas attempts to present the story of Texas's separation from Mexico and eventual annexation to the United States within the broad framework of the law of nations. The first chapter presents the argument that under today's international legal framework, the movement of Texas from Mexican sovereignty to United States acquisition would be illegal. Crimea, Scotland, and Catalonia are used as examples of how the modern system works. In contrast, what happened with Texas falls under the tradition prevailing in the early nineteenth century that recognition merely required three elements: population, territory, and government. His bottom line is that what happened with Texas was a case of "might makes right." Mexico certainly made its share of mistakes, but these did not rise to the level of deserving to have its territory dismembered, as eventually came to pass following the Mexican War. There follow chapters on the Constitution of 1836, what the author calls the "years of the Republic," and on the annexation process. None of these offer much that is not well known to a Texas audience, although they would fill in a great deal of detail for a Mexican audience unfamiliar [End Page 233] with how the Texas constitution diverged from that of the United States. That audience will also benefit from understanding that the differences between Texas presidents Sam Houston and Mirabeau Lamar were substantial and impactful on both relations with Mexico and the annexation process. The book ends with a chapter on slavery, the major conclusion of which follows the recent trend of rejecting the traditional view that the peculiar institution was not a direct cause of the Revolution. To the contrary, following in the steps of Andrew Torget (whom he does not cite) and Alice Baumgartner (whom he does), the author concludes that slavery was not only the most important factor in bringing about the Texas revolt, given the growing antipathy of Mexico's political classes with the institution, but that it served the interests of the United States. Unfortunately, the Mexican reader will find almost nothing about his Texas compatriots in this work. Except for Juan Seguin as a military leader during the Revolution, there is no mention of the Mexican-Texan population. He notes at the end of the book that Mexican scholars should try to understand the circumstances of Mexican Texans, but he could have taken a step in that direction by referring to the growing literature on the subject over the last thirty years. Consequently, while Mexican readers will get a general idea of the process by which Texas became independent, developed as a republic, then became part of the United States, particularly in juridical terms, the most that an English-language audience will get from the book is a better idea of how and why Mexican scholars continue to focus on the Anglo American versus Mexican government struggle. Jesús F. de la Teja Texas State University (Emeritus) Copyright © 2022 The Texas State Historical Association
德克萨斯共和国(1836 - 1845):分裂和吞并Jaime cardenas Gracia(评论)
审核:La德克萨斯州共和党人德(1836 - 1845):Escision y anexion Jaime Cardenas格雷西亚耶稣f . de La Teja Jaime Cardenas格雷西亚,La德克萨斯州共和党人德(1836 - 1845):Escision y anexion(墨西哥:墨西哥大学,2022。第十二页,214页。指出,参考书目)。正如这本关于德克萨斯共和国时代的书的作者多次告诉我们的那样,墨西哥学者对德克萨斯州的历史只表现出有限的兴趣,主要是与书的副标题中指出的两个问题有关:割据和吞并。作为一名法律学者,Cárdenas采取了一种独特的方法,他大胆地试图讲述《理想国》的故事,特别是在法律方面。最终的作品延续了他所批判的德克萨斯的墨西哥学术传统;然而,它以一种更新的方式做到了这一点,考虑到最近德克萨斯州历史编纂的方向,而不是尽可能彻底地参与其中。也许因为他是一名法律学者,Cárdenas试图在国际法的广泛框架内呈现德克萨斯州从墨西哥分离并最终并入美国的故事。第一章提出的论点是,在今天的国际法律框架下,德克萨斯州从墨西哥主权转移到美国收购将是非法的。克里米亚、苏格兰和加泰罗尼亚被用作现代制度如何运作的例子。与此相反,德克萨斯的情况属于19世纪早期流行的传统,即承认只需要三个要素:人口、领土和政府。他的底线是,发生在德克萨斯州的事情是一个“强权即公理”的案例。墨西哥当然也犯了一些错误,但这些错误并没有上升到应该被肢解的程度,就像墨西哥战争后最终发生的那样。接下来的章节是关于1836年宪法的,作者称之为“共和国的岁月”,以及兼并的过程。这些内容对于德克萨斯州的读者来说都不是很熟悉,尽管对于不熟悉德克萨斯州宪法与美国宪法有何不同的墨西哥读者来说,它们会提供大量的细节。与会者还将了解到,得克萨斯州总统萨姆·休斯顿和米拉波奥·拉马尔之间的分歧对与墨西哥的关系和吞并进程都具有重大影响。这本书的最后一章是关于奴隶制的,这一章的主要结论遵循了最近的一种趋势,即反对这种特殊的制度不是革命的直接原因的传统观点。相反,作者遵循安德鲁•托吉特(Andrew Torget)和爱丽丝•鲍姆加特纳(Alice Baumgartner)的观点,得出结论:鉴于墨西哥政治阶层对奴隶制的反感日益加剧,奴隶制不仅是导致德克萨斯起义的最重要因素,而且也符合美国的利益。不幸的是,墨西哥读者在这本书中几乎找不到关于他的德克萨斯同胞的任何信息。除了革命时期的军事领袖胡安·塞根(Juan Seguin)之外,书中没有提到墨西哥裔德克萨斯人。他在书的最后指出,墨西哥学者应该尝试了解墨西哥德州人的情况,但他本可以在这个方向上迈出一步,参考过去三十年来关于这个主题的越来越多的文献。因此,虽然墨西哥读者将对德克萨斯独立、发展为共和国,然后成为美国一部分的过程有一个大致的了解,特别是在法律方面,但英语读者从这本书中得到的最多的是对墨西哥学者如何以及为什么继续关注英美与墨西哥政府的斗争有一个更好的了解。Jesús F. de la Teja德州州立大学(荣誉)版权所有©2022德克萨斯州历史协会
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: The Southwestern Historical Quarterly, continuously published since 1897, is the premier source of scholarly information about the history of Texas and the Southwest. The first 100 volumes of the Quarterly, more than 57,000 pages, are now available Online with searchable Tables of Contents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信