{"title":"A Visualization in GeoGebra of Leibniz’s Argument on the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus","authors":"Weimar Muñoz, Olga Lucía León, Vicenç Font","doi":"10.3390/axioms12101000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the literature, it is usually assumed that Leibniz described proof for the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (FTC) in 1693. However, did he really prove it? If the answer is no from today’s perspective, are there works in which Leibniz introduced arguments that can be understood as formulations and justifications of the FTC? In order to answer this question, we used a historiographic methodology with expert triangulation. From the study of Leibniz’s manuscripts describing the inverse problem of tangents and its relationship with the quadrature problem, we found evidence of a geometrical argument from which the FTC can be inferred. We present this argument using technological resources and modern notation. This result can be used to teach the FTC due to the existence of dynamic and geometrical software, which makes it suitable for the classroom. Moreover, it provides another interpretation of the FTC complementary to the interpretation using Riemann sums.","PeriodicalId":53148,"journal":{"name":"Axioms","volume":"53 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Axioms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12101000","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the literature, it is usually assumed that Leibniz described proof for the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (FTC) in 1693. However, did he really prove it? If the answer is no from today’s perspective, are there works in which Leibniz introduced arguments that can be understood as formulations and justifications of the FTC? In order to answer this question, we used a historiographic methodology with expert triangulation. From the study of Leibniz’s manuscripts describing the inverse problem of tangents and its relationship with the quadrature problem, we found evidence of a geometrical argument from which the FTC can be inferred. We present this argument using technological resources and modern notation. This result can be used to teach the FTC due to the existence of dynamic and geometrical software, which makes it suitable for the classroom. Moreover, it provides another interpretation of the FTC complementary to the interpretation using Riemann sums.
期刊介绍:
Axiomatic theories in physics and in mathematics (for example, axiomatic theory of thermodynamics, and also either the axiomatic classical set theory or the axiomatic fuzzy set theory) Axiomatization, axiomatic methods, theorems, mathematical proofs Algebraic structures, field theory, group theory, topology, vector spaces Mathematical analysis Mathematical physics Mathematical logic, and non-classical logics, such as fuzzy logic, modal logic, non-monotonic logic. etc. Classical and fuzzy set theories Number theory Systems theory Classical measures, fuzzy measures, representation theory, and probability theory Graph theory Information theory Entropy Symmetry Differential equations and dynamical systems Relativity and quantum theories Mathematical chemistry Automata theory Mathematical problems of artificial intelligence Complex networks from a mathematical viewpoint Reasoning under uncertainty Interdisciplinary applications of mathematical theory.