Health-Related Caretaking in an Institutionalized Setting

Darcie Badon, Molly K. Zuckerman, Anna J. Osterholtz
{"title":"Health-Related Caretaking in an Institutionalized Setting","authors":"Darcie Badon, Molly K. Zuckerman, Anna J. Osterholtz","doi":"10.5744/bi.2022.0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Health-related caretaking was provided to individuals institutionalized in the Mississippi State Asylum (MSA), Jackson, MS (AD 1855–1935). However, because of limited associated documentary evidence on caretaking in the MSA and a general dearth of academic knowledge about caretaking in asylums in the Southern United States, information on caretaking and its efficacy in the MSA is limited. Accordingly, we apply a modified Bioarchaeology of Care (BoC) approach and associated web-based Index of Care to a single deceased individual from the MSA, referred to here as their burial designation—Burial 1—integrated with available documentary information, to generate direct insights into caretaking in the MSA. Burial 1’s skeleton exhibits recidivistic cranial trauma (i.e., cranial depression fractures) and substantial entheseal changes in the upper extremities. This trauma, paired with subsequent traumatic brain injury, suggests that Burial 1 may have experienced physical impairment and disability. Further, the disability Burial 1 experienced likely increased their risk of being institutionalized and created complications for them in the MSA. However, the lack of identifying information for individuals buried at the MSA complicates interpretations of the caretaking they may have received, both before and after institutionalization, as well as the efficaciousness of the caretaking and insights from the caretaking into patient and staff communities in the MSA and Burial 1’s social identity and agency. Despite this, findings affirm that future research applying the modified BoC approach could generate otherwise inscrutable information about the lived experiences of institutionalized patients with impairments and disability within historic institutions of care.","PeriodicalId":92991,"journal":{"name":"Bioarchaeology international","volume":"2005 47","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioarchaeology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5744/bi.2022.0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health-related caretaking was provided to individuals institutionalized in the Mississippi State Asylum (MSA), Jackson, MS (AD 1855–1935). However, because of limited associated documentary evidence on caretaking in the MSA and a general dearth of academic knowledge about caretaking in asylums in the Southern United States, information on caretaking and its efficacy in the MSA is limited. Accordingly, we apply a modified Bioarchaeology of Care (BoC) approach and associated web-based Index of Care to a single deceased individual from the MSA, referred to here as their burial designation—Burial 1—integrated with available documentary information, to generate direct insights into caretaking in the MSA. Burial 1’s skeleton exhibits recidivistic cranial trauma (i.e., cranial depression fractures) and substantial entheseal changes in the upper extremities. This trauma, paired with subsequent traumatic brain injury, suggests that Burial 1 may have experienced physical impairment and disability. Further, the disability Burial 1 experienced likely increased their risk of being institutionalized and created complications for them in the MSA. However, the lack of identifying information for individuals buried at the MSA complicates interpretations of the caretaking they may have received, both before and after institutionalization, as well as the efficaciousness of the caretaking and insights from the caretaking into patient and staff communities in the MSA and Burial 1’s social identity and agency. Despite this, findings affirm that future research applying the modified BoC approach could generate otherwise inscrutable information about the lived experiences of institutionalized patients with impairments and disability within historic institutions of care.
机构环境中与健康相关的看护
在密西西比州杰克逊的密西西比州立收容所(MSA)(公元1855-1935年),向收容的个人提供与健康有关的照顾。但是,由于有关在MSA照料的相关文件证据有限,而且普遍缺乏关于美国南部收容所照料的学术知识,因此关于MSA照料及其效力的资料有限。因此,我们采用一种改良的护理生物考古学(BoC)方法和相关的基于网络的护理指数(Index of Care),对MSA的一位死者进行了研究,这里将其称为埋葬名称-埋葬1号,并结合现有的文献信息,以直接了解MSA的护理情况。埋葬1的骨骼表现为累进性颅脑外伤(即颅脑凹陷性骨折)和上肢实质性的骨骺改变。这一创伤,加上随后的创伤性脑损伤,表明埋葬1号可能经历了身体损伤和残疾。此外,1所经历的残疾埋葬可能会增加他们被机构化的风险,并为他们在MSA中造成并发症。然而,由于缺乏被埋葬在MSA的个体的识别信息,使得对他们在制度化之前和之后可能得到的照顾的解释、照顾的有效性以及对MSA患者和工作人员社区的照顾和埋葬1的社会身份和代理的见解变得复杂。尽管如此,研究结果证实,应用改进的BoC方法的未来研究可以产生关于历史护理机构中有损伤和残疾的住院患者的生活经历的其他不可思议的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信