A Thematic Analysis of Narratives About Birth Satisfaction and Health Awareness From Postnatal Women Who Have High and Low Trauma Scores on thePosttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist

IF 0.3 Q4 NURSING
Berbel Emmens, Caroline J. Hollins Martin, Jenny Patterson, Colin R. Martin
{"title":"A Thematic Analysis of Narratives About Birth Satisfaction and Health Awareness From Postnatal Women Who Have High and Low Trauma Scores on the<i>Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist</i>","authors":"Berbel Emmens, Caroline J. Hollins Martin, Jenny Patterson, Colin R. Martin","doi":"10.1891/ijc-2022-0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Around one-third of women experience childbirth trauma, with 3%–15% developing postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder (PP-PTSD). AIM: Explore birth satisfaction and health perception across two groups of postnatal women with either high or low trauma scores. METHOD: Forty postnatal women were divided into groups dependent upon Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL-5) scores: high severity ( n = 20; range 25–57) or low severity ( n = 20; range 0–7). Semi-structured interviews explored women’s childbirth experiences related to birth satisfaction and reports of postnatal health. Thematic analysis was performed. FINDINGS: Narrative content differed appreciably between high (A) and low (B) scoring groups. Group A narratives were more negative (A1: Overall, a negative recall), referencing lack of autonomy, support, or being heard (A2: Missing needs) and negative influences (A3: Disrupting my bubble). Group B recalled more birth satisfaction (B1: Mostly positive recall) associated with (B2: Autonomy; B3: Being cared for; B4: Intuition, instinct, and primal force). Group A narratives focused strongly on mental health (A4: Reduced awareness; A6: Experiencing PTSD; A7: Needing help), with some focus on physical health (A5: How I feel physically); Group B spoke less about health (B5:My health). DISCUSSION: High-quality psychological care during labor, with continuity, choice, support, and control, alongside postnatal health follow-up may improve birth satisfaction and reduce the incidence of PP-PTSD. CONCLUSION: To increase birth satisfaction and reduce trauma, maternity care providers must be supported to prioritize high-quality psychological care to women during labor, providing choice, control, and continuity within trusting relationships. Trusting relationships are key to ongoing conversations regarding health and seeking/receiving help. Routine birth satisfaction screening and education for care providers about signs of trauma are important.","PeriodicalId":43300,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Childbirth","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/ijc-2022-0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Around one-third of women experience childbirth trauma, with 3%–15% developing postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder (PP-PTSD). AIM: Explore birth satisfaction and health perception across two groups of postnatal women with either high or low trauma scores. METHOD: Forty postnatal women were divided into groups dependent upon Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL-5) scores: high severity ( n = 20; range 25–57) or low severity ( n = 20; range 0–7). Semi-structured interviews explored women’s childbirth experiences related to birth satisfaction and reports of postnatal health. Thematic analysis was performed. FINDINGS: Narrative content differed appreciably between high (A) and low (B) scoring groups. Group A narratives were more negative (A1: Overall, a negative recall), referencing lack of autonomy, support, or being heard (A2: Missing needs) and negative influences (A3: Disrupting my bubble). Group B recalled more birth satisfaction (B1: Mostly positive recall) associated with (B2: Autonomy; B3: Being cared for; B4: Intuition, instinct, and primal force). Group A narratives focused strongly on mental health (A4: Reduced awareness; A6: Experiencing PTSD; A7: Needing help), with some focus on physical health (A5: How I feel physically); Group B spoke less about health (B5:My health). DISCUSSION: High-quality psychological care during labor, with continuity, choice, support, and control, alongside postnatal health follow-up may improve birth satisfaction and reduce the incidence of PP-PTSD. CONCLUSION: To increase birth satisfaction and reduce trauma, maternity care providers must be supported to prioritize high-quality psychological care to women during labor, providing choice, control, and continuity within trusting relationships. Trusting relationships are key to ongoing conversations regarding health and seeking/receiving help. Routine birth satisfaction screening and education for care providers about signs of trauma are important.
创伤后应激障碍量表中高、低创伤分产后妇女生育满意度和健康意识的主题分析
背景:大约三分之一的女性经历过分娩创伤,其中3%-15%的女性发展为产后创伤后应激障碍(PP-PTSD)。目的:探讨两组创伤评分高或低的产后妇女的分娩满意度和健康感知。方法:40名产后妇女根据创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCL-5)评分分为两组:重度组(n = 20;范围25-57)或低严重性(n = 20;范围鹿)。半结构化访谈探讨了妇女分娩经历与分娩满意度和产后健康报告的关系。进行了专题分析。结果:叙事内容在高(A)和低(B)评分组之间存在明显差异。A组的叙述更消极(A1:总体而言,是消极的回忆),提到缺乏自主性、支持或被倾听(A2:缺失需求)和负面影响(A3:破坏我的泡泡)。B组回忆更多的出生满意度(B1:主要是积极回忆)与(B2:自主性;B3:被关心;直觉、本能和原始力量)。A组叙述强烈侧重于心理健康(A4:意识降低;A6:患有PTSD;A7:需要帮助),重点关注身体健康(A5:我的身体感觉如何);B组较少谈论健康(B5:我的健康)。讨论:分娩过程中高质量的心理护理,具有连续性、选择性、支持和控制,以及产后健康随访,可以提高分娩满意度,减少产后创伤后应激障碍的发生率。结论:为了提高分娩满意度和减少创伤,必须支持产科护理提供者优先为分娩期间的妇女提供高质量的心理护理,在信任关系中提供选择、控制和连续性。信任的关系是进行健康对话和寻求/接受帮助的关键。常规的分娩满意度筛查和对护理人员关于创伤迹象的教育是重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信