Format for safe introduction of robotic esophagectomy

Maria Erodotou, Sjoerd M. Lagarde, Bas P.L. Wijnhoven, Pieter C. van der Sluis
{"title":"Format for safe introduction of robotic esophagectomy","authors":"Maria Erodotou, Sjoerd M. Lagarde, Bas P.L. Wijnhoven, Pieter C. van der Sluis","doi":"10.20517/2574-1225.2023.95","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to review the current literature on the learning curve for robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) and explore strategies for introducing and implementing RAMIE. A literature search of electronic databases (Pubmed and Science Direct) was conducted using multiple combinations and synonyms of the keywords “esophageal cancer”, “robotic esophagectomy”, “RAMIE”, and “learning curve” up to March 31, 2023. In total, eighteen studies were included. Fourteen studies reported on surgeons with experience in minimally invasive surgery. Seven studies reported on surgeons with prior robotic experience for benign diseases or experience as observant or assistant in robotic surgery or experience on cadaveric robotic training. Four studies reported on a specific training pathway. The learning curve was mostly analyzed using the cumulative sum control chart (CUSUM). The most commonly used measured variables were the total operation time, the thoracic and abdominal console time, the lymph node yield, and vocal cord palsy rates. Τhe learning curve plateaus for the total operative time, the vocal cord palsy rates, and the lymph node yield varied between 20-80, 15-80, and 18-73 cases, respectively. At present, several centers are increasingly adopting RAMIE for esophageal cancer. Education about the learning curve of RAMIE is crucial for the training pathway in order to safely introduce RAMIE in centers without pre-existing robotic esophagectomy experience.","PeriodicalId":486733,"journal":{"name":"Mini-invasive surgery","volume":"33 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mini-invasive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2023.95","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to review the current literature on the learning curve for robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) and explore strategies for introducing and implementing RAMIE. A literature search of electronic databases (Pubmed and Science Direct) was conducted using multiple combinations and synonyms of the keywords “esophageal cancer”, “robotic esophagectomy”, “RAMIE”, and “learning curve” up to March 31, 2023. In total, eighteen studies were included. Fourteen studies reported on surgeons with experience in minimally invasive surgery. Seven studies reported on surgeons with prior robotic experience for benign diseases or experience as observant or assistant in robotic surgery or experience on cadaveric robotic training. Four studies reported on a specific training pathway. The learning curve was mostly analyzed using the cumulative sum control chart (CUSUM). The most commonly used measured variables were the total operation time, the thoracic and abdominal console time, the lymph node yield, and vocal cord palsy rates. Τhe learning curve plateaus for the total operative time, the vocal cord palsy rates, and the lymph node yield varied between 20-80, 15-80, and 18-73 cases, respectively. At present, several centers are increasingly adopting RAMIE for esophageal cancer. Education about the learning curve of RAMIE is crucial for the training pathway in order to safely introduce RAMIE in centers without pre-existing robotic esophagectomy experience.
安全引入机器人食管切除术的格式
本研究的目的是回顾目前关于机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)学习曲线的文献,并探讨引入和实施RAMIE的策略。使用关键词“食管癌”、“机器人食管切除术”、“RAMIE”和“学习曲线”的多种组合和同义词,检索截至2023年3月31日的电子数据库(Pubmed和Science Direct)的文献。总共纳入了18项研究。14项研究报道了具有微创手术经验的外科医生。七项研究报告了具有良性疾病机器人经验的外科医生或具有机器人手术观察或助理经验的外科医生或具有尸体机器人训练经验的外科医生。四项研究报告了具体的培训途径。学习曲线主要采用累积和控制图(CUSUM)进行分析。最常用的测量变量是总手术时间、胸腹两侧手术时间、淋巴结清扫量和声带麻痹率。Τhe总手术时间、声带麻痹率和淋巴结肿大的学习曲线平台分别为20-80例、15-80例和18-73例。目前,一些中心越来越多地采用RAMIE治疗食管癌。为了在没有机器人食管切除术经验的中心安全地引入RAMIE,关于RAMIE学习曲线的教育对于培训途径至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信