Two roads diverge in cyberspace: dual but opposing social media pathways affecting teens’ well-being

IF 3.5 Q2 BUSINESS
Kristin Stewart, Glen Brodowsky, Donald Sciglimpaglia
{"title":"Two roads diverge in cyberspace: dual but opposing social media pathways affecting teens’ well-being","authors":"Kristin Stewart, Glen Brodowsky, Donald Sciglimpaglia","doi":"10.1108/yc-05-2023-1735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Many believe that any social media harms kids because of frequent use. This study aims to examine these assumptions. It proposes and tests a model that considers two alternative pathways – one negative and one positive – through which social media affects teens’ self-reported subjective well-being. Design/methodology/approach This research used Preacher and Hayes process modeling to conduct path analysis on data collected on 585 teenagers from across the USA. Findings Results showed that along a negative pathway, frequent social media use leads to greater risky social media engagement that ultimately diminishes adolescent’s sense of well-being. Also, and perhaps simultaneously, frequent social media use leads to socially-connected social media use that enhances adolescent’s sense of well-being. Practical implications The research recommends ways parents, policymakers and platforms can encourage teens to use social media to connect with friends while guiding them away from pathways exposing them to risky behaviors. Originality/value Findings show more social media use is not necessarily harmful, but more of some types is bad, while more of others is good.","PeriodicalId":46660,"journal":{"name":"Young Consumers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Young Consumers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/yc-05-2023-1735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Many believe that any social media harms kids because of frequent use. This study aims to examine these assumptions. It proposes and tests a model that considers two alternative pathways – one negative and one positive – through which social media affects teens’ self-reported subjective well-being. Design/methodology/approach This research used Preacher and Hayes process modeling to conduct path analysis on data collected on 585 teenagers from across the USA. Findings Results showed that along a negative pathway, frequent social media use leads to greater risky social media engagement that ultimately diminishes adolescent’s sense of well-being. Also, and perhaps simultaneously, frequent social media use leads to socially-connected social media use that enhances adolescent’s sense of well-being. Practical implications The research recommends ways parents, policymakers and platforms can encourage teens to use social media to connect with friends while guiding them away from pathways exposing them to risky behaviors. Originality/value Findings show more social media use is not necessarily harmful, but more of some types is bad, while more of others is good.
网络空间中出现了两条不同的道路:影响青少年健康的两种相反的社交媒体途径
许多人认为,任何社交媒体都会因为频繁使用而伤害孩子。本研究旨在检验这些假设。它提出并测试了一个模型,该模型考虑了两种替代途径——一种是消极的,一种是积极的——社交媒体通过这两种途径影响青少年自我报告的主观幸福感。本研究使用传教士和海耶斯过程模型对来自美国各地的585名青少年收集的数据进行路径分析。研究结果表明,在消极的道路上,频繁使用社交媒体会导致更大的社交媒体风险,最终会削弱青少年的幸福感。此外,也许同时,频繁使用社交媒体会导致社交媒体的使用,从而增强青少年的幸福感。该研究建议父母、政策制定者和平台鼓励青少年使用社交媒体与朋友联系,同时引导他们远离危险行为的途径。独创性/价值调查结果显示,更多地使用社交媒体并不一定有害,但某些类型的使用更多是坏事,而其他类型的使用更多是好事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Young Consumers
Young Consumers BUSINESS-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信